💾 Archived View for gemini.bunburya.eu › newsgroups › gemini › messages › ydleyh8ifq.fsf@UBEblock.ps… captured on 2024-07-09 at 00:03:24. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2022-04-28)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Re: Gemini markup extensions [Was: Re: a solution for emphasis]

Message headers

From: Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid>

Subject: Re: Gemini markup extensions [Was: Re: a solution for emphasis]

Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2022 11:41:13 -0500

Message-ID: <ydleyh8ifq.fsf@UBEblock.psr.com>

Message content

Jason McBrayer <jmcbray@carcosa.net> posted:

Vlad Markov <vlad@happy.dwarf7.net> writes:

===[No]=== >> On 2022-02-07, Winston <wbe@UBEBLOCK.psr.com.invalid> wrote:

> I do not think any more rendering directives should be added to gemini.
> If more advanced rendering is required then use a pdf document A gemini
> URL can point to a pdf document. There is little value in recreating
> HTML in gemini.

For the record, that was Vlad's comment, not mine.

-WBE

Related

Parent:

Re: Gemini markup extensions [Was: Re: a solution for emphasis] (by Jason McBrayer <jmcbray@carcosa.net> on Fri, 11 Feb 2022 09:17:17 -0500)

Start of thread:

a solution for emphasis (by Gustaf Erikson <gerikson@gmial.com> on Sat, 05 Feb 2022 00:13:15 +0100)