💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › johan › 13783 captured on 2024-06-16 at 18:11:31. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2024-05-10)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: "Wanted: a step up from dwm..."
i can second awesomewm. Wayland had me switch to sway a few years ago but I was not happy to switch initially because awesome was, well, awesome :) There is some config but you will get quite far with a few extra lines on top of defaults.
Jan 12 · 5 months ago
but with that said, why not wayland on linux? the only thing that still works poorly afaik is screen sharing with <insert giant corporate chat client>. apart from that wayland is so much smoother
☕️ hellfire103 · Jan 12 at 08:24:
Spectrwm is a dwm fork that has on-the-fly configuration.
I've also heard good things about cwm from OpenBSD.
+1 for cwm, it can do floating windows and tiling, very easy to configure (without having to rebuild) and has Linux ports
🦀 jeang3nie · Jan 12 at 21:40:
I use I3 on FreeBSD. The config file isn't all that hard to figure out and there's a fair amount of extensibility without it being complex out of the box.
Historical footnote, Sway was developed as a Wayland clone of I3. They even share config formats. I use Sway on Linux and I3 on FreeBSD. Have to look at my shell prompt sometimes to tell the difference.
Wanted: a step up from dwm... — I am looking to upgrade from dwm to something a little bit easier to configure. I love dwm, and am generally happy with it. But I need a little more flexibility -- just a little. Maybe different kind of layouts in different windows (or tags or whatever). And while I am fluent in C, I find the way configuration works clumsy and hard to maintain, especially when patches are involved. However, it seems that every time I look at other tiling wms, they instantly...