💾 Archived View for radia.bortzmeyer.org › rfc-mirror › rfc9375.txt captured on 2024-07-09 at 05:35:09.
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-06-14)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) B. Wu, Ed.
Request for Comments: 9375 Q. Wu, Ed.
Category: Standards Track Huawei
ISSN: 2070-1721 M. Boucadair, Ed.
Orange
O. Gonzalez de Dios
Telefonica
B. Wen
Comcast
April 2023
A YANG Data Model for Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring
Abstract
The data model for network topologies defined in RFC 8345 introduces
vertical layering relationships between networks that can be
augmented to cover network and service topologies. This document
defines a YANG module for performance monitoring (PM) of both
underlay networks and overlay VPN services that can be used to
monitor and manage network performance on the topology of both
layers.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9375.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
2. Terminology
2.1. Acronyms
3. Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring Model Usage
3.1. Collecting Data via the Pub/Sub Mechanism
3.2. Collecting Data On Demand
4. Description of the YANG Data Model
4.1. Layering Relationship between Multiple Layers of Topology
4.2. Network-Level Performance Monitoring Augmentation
4.3. Node-Level Performance Monitoring Augmentation
4.4. Performance Monitoring Augmentation at Link and Termination
Point Level
5. Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring YANG Module
6. Security Considerations
7. IANA Considerations
8. References
8.1. Normative References
8.2. Informative References
Appendix A. Illustrative Examples
A.1. Example of VPN Performance Subscription
A.2. Example of VPN Performance Snapshot
A.3. Example of Percentile Monitoring
Acknowledgements
Contributors
Authors' Addresses
1. Introduction
[RFC8969] describes a framework for automating service and network
management with YANG [RFC7950] data models. It states that the
performance measurement telemetry model should be tied to the
services (such as a Layer 3 VPN or Layer 2 VPN) or to the network
models to monitor the overall network performance and the Service
Level Agreements (SLAs).
The performance of VPN services is associated with the performance
changes of the underlay networks that carry VPN services. For
example, link delay between Provider Edge (PE) and Provider (P)
devices and packet loss status on Layer 2 and Layer 3 interfaces
connecting PEs and Customer Edge (CE) devices directly impact VPN
service performance. Additionally, the integration of Layer 2 /
Layer 3 VPN performance and network performance data enables the
orchestrator to monitor consistently. Therefore, this document
defines a YANG module for both network and VPN service performance
monitoring (PM). The module can be used to monitor and manage
network performance on the topology level or the service topology
between VPN sites.
The base model specified in Section 5 can be extended to include
technology-specific details, e.g., adding Explicit Congestion
Notification (ECN) statistics for Layer 3 networks or VPN services to
support performance-sensitive applications.
This document does not introduce new metrics for network performance
or mechanisms for measuring network performance, but it uses the
existing mechanisms and statistics to monitor the performance of the
network and the services.
The YANG module defined in this document is designed as an
augmentation to the network topology YANG data model defined in
[RFC8345] and draws on relevant YANG types defined in [RFC6991],
[RFC8345], [RFC8532], and [RFC9181].
Appendix A provides a set of examples to illustrate the use of the
module.
2. Terminology
The following terms are defined in [RFC7950] and are used in this
specification:
* augment
* data model
* data node
The terminology for describing YANG data models is found in
[RFC7950].
The tree diagrams used in this document follow the notation defined
in [RFC8340].
2.1. Acronyms
The following acronyms are used in the document:
CE Customer Edge, as defined in [RFC4026]
L2VPN Layer 2 Virtual Private Network, as defined in [RFC4026]
L3VPN Layer 3 Virtual Private Network, as defined in [RFC4026]
L2NM L2VPN Network Model
L3NM L3VPN Network Model
MPLS Multiprotocol Label Switching
OAM Operations, Administration, and Maintenance
OSPF Open Shortest Path First
OWAMP One-Way Active Measurement Protocol, as defined in
[RFC4656]
P Provider router, as defined in [RFC4026]
PE Provider Edge, as defined in [RFC4026]
PM Performance Monitoring
SLA Service Level Agreement
TP Termination Point, as defined in [RFC8345], Section 4.2
TWAMP Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol, as defined in
[RFC5357]
VPLS Virtual Private LAN Service, as defined in [RFC4026]
VPN Virtual Private Network
3. Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring Model Usage
Models are key for automating network management operations
(Section 3 of [RFC8969]). Particularly, together with service and
network models, performance measurement telemetry models are needed
to monitor network performance to meet specific service requirements
(typically captured in an SLA).
+---------------+
| Customer |
+-------+-------+
|
Customer Service Models |
|
+-------+---------+
| Service |
| Orchestrator |
+------+-+--------+
| |
Network Service Models | | Network and VPN Service PM Models
| |
+------+-+--------+
| Network |
| Controller |
+-------+---------+
|
+-----------------------+------------------------+
Network
Figure 1: An Example Architecture with a Service Orchestrator
The network and VPN service PM model can be used to expose
operational performance information to the layer above, e.g., to an
orchestrator or other Business Support System (BSS) / Operational
Support System (OSS) client application, via standard network
management APIs. Figure 1 shows an example usage in a layered model
architecture as described in [RFC8309].
Before using the model, the controller needs to establish topology
visibility of the network and VPN. For example, the controller can
use network information from [RFC8345] and [YANG-SAP] or VPN
information from the L3VPN Network Model (L3NM) [RFC9182] and the
L2VPN Network Model (L2NM) [RFC9291]. Then the controller derives
network or VPN performance data by aggregating (and filtering) lower-
level data collected via monitoring counters of the devices involved.
The network or VPN performance data can be based on different
sources. For example, the performance monitoring data per link in
the underlying networks can be collected using a network performance
measurement method such as the One-Way Active Measurement Protocol
(OWAMP) [RFC4656], Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)
[RFC5357], Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol (STAMP)
[RFC8762], Multiprotocol Label Switching (MPLS) Loss and Delay
Measurement [RFC6374], or In situ OAM (IOAM) [RFC9197]. The
performance monitoring information reflecting the quality of the
network or VPN service (e.g., network performance data between source
node and destination node in the networks or between VPN sites) can
be computed and aggregated, for example, using the information from
the Traffic Engineering Database (TED) [RFC7471] [RFC8570] [RFC8571]
or Large-Scale Measurement Platform (LMAP) [RFC8194].
The measurement and report intervals that are associated with these
performance data usually depend on the configuration of the specific
measurement method or collection method or various combinations.
This document defines network-wide measurement intervals to align
measurement requirements for networks or VPN services.
3.1. Collecting Data via the Pub/Sub Mechanism
Some applications, such as service-assurance applications, which must
maintain a continuous view of operational data and state, can use the
subscription model specified in [RFC8641] to subscribe to the
specific network performance data or VPN service performance data
they are interested in, at the data source. For example, network or
VPN topology updates may be obtained through on-change notifications
[RFC8641]. For dynamic PM data (e.g., VPN Routing and Forwarding
(VRF) routes or Media Access Control (MAC) entries, link metrics, and
interface metrics), various notifications can be specified to obtain
more complete data. A periodic notification [RFC8641] can be
specified to obtain real-time performance data. For devices/
controllers that maintain historical performance data for a period of
time, a replay notification (see [RFC5277] or [RFC8639]) can be used
to obtain the historical data. And alarm notifications [RFC8632] can
be specified to get alarms for the metrics that exceed or fall below
the performance threshold.
The data source can then use the network and VPN service performance
monitoring model defined in this document and the YANG-Push data
model [RFC8641] to distribute specific telemetry data to target
recipients.
3.2. Collecting Data On Demand
To obtain a snapshot of performance data from a network topology or a
VPN service topology, service-assurance applications may retrieve
information using the network and VPN service PM model through a
Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF) [RFC6241] or a RESTCONF
[RFC8040] interface. For example, a specified "link-id" of a VPN can
be used as a filter in a RESTCONF GET request to retrieve per-link
VPN PM data.
4. Description of the YANG Data Model
This document defines the "ietf-network-vpn-pm" YANG module, which is
an augmentation to the "ietf-network" and "ietf-network-topology"
YANG modules.
4.1. Layering Relationship between Multiple Layers of Topology
[RFC8345] defines a YANG data model for network/service topologies
and inventories. The service topology described in [RFC8345]
includes the abstract topology for a service layer above Layer 1
(L1), Layer 2 (L2), and Layer 3 (L3) underlay topologies. This
service topology has the generic topology elements of node, link, and
termination point. One typical example of a service topology is
described in Figure 3 of [RFC8345]: two VPN service topologies
instantiated over a common L3 topology. Each VPN service topology is
mapped onto a subset of nodes from the L3 topology.
Figure 2 illustrates an example of a topology hierarchy that maps
between the VPN service topology and an underlying Layer 3 network
topology.
VPN 1 VPN 2
+------------------------+ +------------------------+
/ / / /
/ S1C_[VN3].......... / / /
/ \ : / / S2A_[VN1]____[VN3]_S2B /
/ \ : / / * * /
/ \ :............ * .... * /
/ S1B_[VN2]____[VN1]_S1A / / * : * /
+---------:-------:------+ +-------*------:-----*---+
: : * * * * * : *
: : * : *
Site-1A : +-------:-*--------------------:-----*-----+ Site-1C
[CE1]___:_/_______[N1]___________________[N2]___*____/__[CE3]
:/ / / \ _____// * /
[CE5]_____:_______/ / \ _____/ / * /
Site-2A /: / \ / / * /
/ : [N5] / * /
/ : / __/ \__ / * /
/ : / ___/ \__ / * /
Site-1B / : / ___/ \ /* / Site-2B
[CE2]__/________[N4]__________________[N3]________/____[CE4]
/ /
+------------------------------------------+
L3 Topology
Legend:
N: Node
VN: VPN Node
S: Site
CE: Customer Edge
__ Link within a network layer
: Mapping between VPN 1 service topology and L3 topology
* Mapping between VPN 2 service topology and L3 topology
Figure 2: Example of Topology Mapping between VPN Service
Topology and an Underlying Network
As shown in Figure 2, two VPN services topologies are built on top of
one underlying Layer 3 network:
VPN 1: This service topology supports Hub-and-Spoke communications
for "customer 1", connecting the customer's access at three sites:
Site-1A, Site-1B, and Site-1C. These sites are connected to nodes
that are mapped to node 1 (N1), node 2 (N2), and node 4 (N4) in
the underlying Layer 3 network. Site-1A plays the role of Hub
while Site-1B and Site-1C are configured as Spokes.
VPN 2: This service topology supports any-to-any communications for
"customer 2", connecting the customer's access at two sites: Site-
2A and Site-2B. These sites are connected to nodes that are
mapped to node 1 (N1) and node 3 (N3) in the underlying Layer 3
network. Site-2A and Site-2B have an "any-to-any" role.
Based on the association between VPN service topologies and
underlying network topologies, the Network and VPN Service PM YANG
module extends the performance status of the underlay networks and
VPN services. For example, the module can provide link PM statistics
and port statistics of an underlay network, e.g., Layer 1, Layer 2,
Layer 3, and OSPF networks. It can also provide VPN PM statistics,
which can be further split into PM for the VPN tunnel and PM at the
VPN PE access node, as illustrated in the following diagram.
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| |
| VPN2 Link |
| |<-------------------->| |
| | | |
| VPN2+---+---+ +---+---+VPN2 |
| TP1| VN1 | Tunnel PM | VN3 |TP2 |
| ---+ PE A |==============| PE B +---- |
|vpn-access+-------+ +-------+ vpn-access|
|-interface| | -interface|
| |##############################| |
| |inter-vpn-access-interface PM | |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
| |
| |
+----+ | TP+-----+ Link +---+ Link +-----+TP | +----+
| CE4+-+----------+ N1 +-------+-N2+-------+ N3 +----------+-+CE5 |
+----+ | 1-1+-----+1-2 2-1+---+2-2 3-1+-----+3-2 | +----+
| |
| |
+-----------------------------------------------------+
Legend:
N: node
VN: VPN Node
TP: Termination Point
-: Link
Figure 3: An Example of VPN PM
Figure 3 illustrates an example of VPN PM and two VPN PM measurement
methods including the VPN tunnel PM and the inter-VPN-access
interface PM. VPN PM can also provide statistics on VPN access
interfaces, the number of current VRF routes, or L2VPN MAC entry of a
VPN node.
4.2. Network-Level Performance Monitoring Augmentation
The module described below can be used for performance monitoring for
both the underlay networks and the VPN services, which would be
separate entries in the network list [RFC8345]. The differences are
as follows:
* When the "service" presence container is absent, then it indicates
performance monitoring of the network itself.
* When the "service" presence container is present, then it
indicates performance monitoring of the VPN service specified by
the "service-type" leaf, e.g., L3VPN or Virtual Private LAN
Service (VPLS). The values are taken from [RFC9181]. When a
network topology instance contains the L3VPN or other L2VPN
network types, it represents a VPN instance that can perform
performance monitoring.
The YANG tree in Figure 4 is a part of the "ietf-network-vpn-pm"
tree. It defines the following set of network-level attributes:
"vpn-id": Refers to an identifier of VPN service defined in
[RFC9181]. This identifier is used to correlate the performance
status with the network service configuration.
"vpn-service-topology": Indicates the type of VPN service topology.
This model supports "any-to-any", "hub-spoke" (where Hubs can
exchange traffic), and "hub-spoke-disjoint" (where Hubs cannot
exchange traffic), which are taken from [RFC9181]. These VPN
service topology types can be used to describe how VPN sites
communicate with each other.
module: ietf-network-vpn-pm
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types:
+--rw service!
+--rw service-type identityref
+--rw vpn-id? vpn-common:vpn-id
+--rw vpn-service-topology? identityref
Figure 4: Network-Level YANG Tree
4.3. Node-Level Performance Monitoring Augmentation
The YANG tree in Figure 5 is the node part of the "ietf-network-vpn-
pm" tree.
For network performance monitoring, the module defines the following
attributes:
"node-type": Indicates the device type of the PE, P device, or
Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) as defined in [RFC4026] and
[RFC4364] so that the performance metric between any two nodes
that each have a specific node type can be reported.
"entry-summary": Lists a set of IPv4 statistics, IPv6 statistics,
and MAC statistics. The detailed statistics are specified
separately.
For VPN service topology, the module defines one attribute:
"role": Defines the role in a particular VPN service topology. The
roles are taken from [RFC9181] (e.g., "any-to-any-role", "spoke-
role", and "hub-role").
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node:
+--rw node-type? identityref
+--ro entry-summary
+--ro ipv4-num
| +--ro maximum-routes? uint32
| +--ro total-active-routes? uint32
+--ro ipv6-num
| +--ro maximum-routes? uint32
| +--ro total-active-routes? uint32
+--ro mac-num
+--ro maximum-mac-entries? uint32
+--ro total-active-mac-entries? uint32
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node:
+--rw role? identityref
Figure 5: Node-Level YANG Tree
4.4. Performance Monitoring Augmentation at Link and Termination Point
Level
The YANG tree in Figure 6 is the link and termination point (TP) part
of the "ietf-network-vpn-pm" tree.
The "links" are classified into two types: topology link (defined in
[RFC8345]) and abstract link of a VPN between PEs (defined in this
module).
The performance data of a link is a collection of counters and gauges
that report the performance status. All these metrics are defined as
unidirectional metrics.
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link:
+--rw perf-mon
+--rw low-percentile? percentile
+--rw intermediate-percentile? percentile
+--rw high-percentile? percentile
+--rw measurement-interval? uint32
+--ro pm* [pm-type]
| +--ro pm-type identityref
| +--ro pm-attributes
| +--ro start-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro end-time? yang:date-and-time
| +--ro pm-source? identityref
| +--ro one-way-pm-statistics
| | +--ro loss-statistics
| | | +--ro packet-loss-count? yang:counter64
| | | +--ro loss-ratio? percentage
| | +--ro delay-statistics
| | | +--ro unit-value? identityref
| | | +--ro min-delay-value? yang:gauge64
| | | +--ro max-delay-value? yang:gauge64
| | | +--ro low-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | | +--ro intermediate-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | | +--ro high-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro jitter-statistics
| | +--ro unit-value? identityref
| | +--ro min-jitter-value? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro max-jitter-value? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro low-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro intermediate-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro high-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64
| +--ro one-way-pm-statistics-per-class* [class-id]
| +--ro class-id string
| +--ro loss-statistics
| | +--ro packet-loss-count? yang:counter64
| | +--ro loss-ratio? percentage
| +--ro delay-statistics
| | +--ro unit-value? identityref
| | +--ro min-delay-value? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro max-delay-value? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro low-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro intermediate-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64
| | +--ro high-delay-percentile? yang:gauge64
| +--ro jitter-statistics
| +--ro unit-value? identityref
| +--ro min-jitter-value? yang:gauge64
| +--ro max-jitter-value? yang:gauge64
| +--ro low-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64
| +--ro intermediate-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64
| +--ro high-jitter-percentile? yang:gauge64
+--rw vpn-pm-type
+--rw inter-vpn-access-interface
| +--rw inter-vpn-access-interface? empty
+--rw vpn-tunnel!
+--ro vpn-tunnel-type? identityref
augment /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point:
+--ro pm-statistics
+--ro last-updated? yang:date-and-time
+--ro inbound-octets? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-unicast? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-broadcast? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-multicast? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-discards? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-errors? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-unknown-protocol? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-octets? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-unicast? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-broadcast? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-multicast? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-discards? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-errors? yang:counter64
+--ro vpn-network-access* [network-access-id]
+--ro network-access-id vpn-common:vpn-id
+--ro last-updated? yang:date-and-time
+--ro inbound-octets? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-unicast? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-broadcast? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-multicast? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-discards? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-errors? yang:counter64
+--ro inbound-unknown-protocol? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-octets? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-unicast? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-broadcast? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-multicast? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-discards? yang:counter64
+--ro outbound-errors? yang:counter64
Figure 6: Link and Termination Point YANG Subtree
For the data nodes of "link" depicted in Figure 6, the YANG module
defines the following minimal set of link-level performance
attributes:
Percentile parameters: The module supports reporting delay and
jitter metrics with percentile values. There are three percentile
values for configuring various percentile reporting levels. By
default, low percentile (10th percentile), intermediate percentile
(50th percentile), and high percentile (90th percentile) are used.
Configuring a percentile to 0.000 indicates the client is not
interested in receiving a particular percentile. If all
percentile nodes are configured to 0.000, it represents that no
percentile-related nodes will be reported for a given performance
metric (e.g., one-way delay and one-way delay variation) and only
peak/min values will be reported. For example, a client can
inform the server that it is interested in receiving only high
percentiles. Then for a given link at a given "start-time", "end-
time", and "measurement-interval", the "high-delay-percentile" and
"high-jitter-percentile" will be reported. An example to
illustrate the use of percentiles is provided in Appendix A.3.
Measurement interval ("measurement-interval"): Specifies the
performance measurement interval, in seconds.
Start time ("start-time"): Indicates the start time of the
performance measurement for link statistics.
End time ("end-time"): Indicates the end time of the performance
measurement for link statistics.
PM source ("pm-source"): Indicates the performance monitoring
source. The data for the topology link can be based, e.g., on BGP
- Link State (BGP-LS) [RFC8571]. The statistics of the VPN
abstract links can be collected based upon VPN OAM mechanisms,
e.g., OAM mechanisms referenced in [RFC9182] or Ethernet service
OAM [ITU-T-Y-1731] referenced in [RFC9291]. Alternatively, the
data can be based upon the underlay technology OAM mechanisms,
e.g., Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) tunnel OAM.
Loss statistics: A set of one-way loss statistics attributes that
are used to measure end-to-end loss between VPN sites or between
any two network nodes. The exact loss value or the loss
percentage can be reported.
Delay statistics: A set of one-way delay statistics attributes that
are used to measure end-to-end latency between VPN sites or
between any two network nodes. The peak/min values or percentile
values can be reported.
Jitter statistics: A set of one-way IP Packet Delay Variation
[RFC3393] statistics attributes that are used to measure end-to-
end jitter between VPN sites or between any two network nodes.
The peak/min values or percentile values can be reported.
PM statistics per class: "one-way-pm-statistics-per-class" lists
performance measurement statistics for the topology link or the
abstract link between VPN PEs with given "class-id" names. The
list is defined separately from "one-way-pm-statistics", which is
used to collect generic metrics for unspecified "class-id" names.
VPN PM type ("vpn-pm-type"): Indicates the VPN performance type,
which can be "inter-vpn-access-interface" PM or "vpn-tunnel" PM.
These two methods are common VPN measurement methods. The "inter-
VPN-access-interface" PM is used to monitor the performance of
logical point-to-point VPN connections between source and
destination VPN access interfaces. And the "vpn-tunnel" PM is
used to monitor the performance of VPN tunnels. The "inter-VPN-
access-interface" PM includes PE-PE monitoring. Therefore,
usually only one of the two methods is used. The "inter-VPN-
access-interface" PM is defined as an empty leaf, which is not
bound to a specific VPN access interface. The source or
destination VPN access interface of the measurement can be
augmented as needed.
VPN tunnel type ("vpn-tunnel-type"): Indicates the abstract link
protocol-type of a VPN, such as GRE or IP-in-IP. The leaf refers
to an identifier of the "underlay-transport" defined in [RFC9181],
which describes the transport technology that carries the traffic
of the VPN service. In the case of multiple types of tunnels
between a single pair of VPN nodes, a separate link for each type
of tunnel can be created.
For the data nodes of "termination-point" depicted in Figure 6, the
module defines the following minimal set of statistics:
Last updated time ("last-updated"): Indicates the date and time when
the counters were last updated.
Inbound statistics: A set of inbound statistics attributes that are
used to measure the inbound statistics of the termination point,
such as received packets, received packets with errors, etc.
Outbound statistics: A set of outbound statistics attributes that
are used to measure the outbound statistics of the termination
point, such as sent packets, packets that could not be sent due to
errors, etc.
VPN network access ("vpn-network-access"): Lists counters of the VPN
network access defined in the L3NM [RFC9182] or the L2NM
[RFC9291]. When multiple VPN network accesses are created using
the same physical port, finer-grained metrics can be monitored.
If a TP is associated with only a single VPN, this list is not
required.
5. Network and VPN Service Performance Monitoring YANG Module
The "ietf-network-vpn-pm" YANG module uses types defined in
[RFC6991], [RFC8345], [RFC8532], and [RFC9181].
<CODE BEGINS> file "ietf-network-vpn-pm@2023-03-20.yang"
module ietf-network-vpn-pm {
yang-version 1.1;
namespace "urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-vpn-pm";
prefix nvp;
import ietf-yang-types {
prefix yang;
reference
"RFC 6991: Common YANG Data Types";
}
import ietf-vpn-common {
prefix vpn-common;
reference
"RFC 9181: A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and
Layer 3 VPNs";
}
import ietf-network {
prefix nw;
reference
"RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network
Topologies, Section 6.1";
}
import ietf-network-topology {
prefix nt;
reference
"RFC 8345: A YANG Data Model for Network
Topologies, Section 6.2";
}
import ietf-lime-time-types {
prefix lime;
reference
"RFC 8532: Generic YANG Data Model for the Management of
Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)
Protocols That Use Connectionless Communications";
}
organization
"IETF OPSAWG (Operations and Management Area Working Group)";
contact
"WG Web: <https://datatracker.ietf.org/wg/opsawg/>
WG List: <mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>
Editor: Bo Wu
<lana.wubo@huawei.com>
Editor: Mohamed Boucadair
<mohamed.boucadair@orange.com>
Editor: Qin Wu
<bill.wu@huawei.com>
Author: Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
<oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com>
Author: Bin Wen
<bin_wen@comcast.com>";
description
"This YANG module defines a model for network and VPN service
performance monitoring (PM).
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as
authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or
without modification, is permitted pursuant to, and subject
to the license terms contained in, the Revised BSD License
set forth in Section 4.c of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions
Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
This version of this YANG module is part of RFC 9375
(https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9375); see the RFC itself
for full legal notices.";
revision 2023-03-20 {
description
"Initial revision.";
reference
"RFC 9375: A YANG Data Model for Network and VPN Service
Performance Monitoring";
}
identity node-type {
description
"Base identity for node type";
}
identity pe {
base node-type;
description
"Provider Edge (PE) node type. A PE is the device or set
of devices at the edge of the provider network with the
functionality that is needed to interface with the
customer.";
}
identity p {
base node-type;
description
"Provider router node type. That is, a router
in the core network that does not have interfaces
directly toward a customer.";
}
identity asbr {
base node-type;
description
"Autonomous System Border Router (ASBR) node type.";
reference
"RFC 4364: BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)";
}
identity pm-source-type {
description
"Base identity from which specific performance monitoring
mechanism types are derived.";
}
identity pm-source-bgpls {
base pm-source-type;
description
"Indicates BGP-LS as the performance monitoring metric
source.";
reference
"RFC 8571: BGP - Link State (BGP-LS) Advertisement of
IGP Traffic Engineering Performance Metric
Extensions";
}
identity pm-source-owamp {
base pm-source-type;
description
"Indicates the One-Way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP)
as the performance monitoring metric source.";
reference
"RFC 4656: A One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP)";
}
identity pm-source-twamp {
base pm-source-type;
description
"Indicates the Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)
as the performance monitoring metric source.";
reference
"RFC 5357: A Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)";
}
identity pm-source-stamp {
base pm-source-type;
description
"Indicates the Simple Two-way Active Measurement Protocol
(STAMP) as the performance monitoring metric source.";
reference
"RFC 8762: Simple Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol";
}
identity pm-source-y-1731 {
base pm-source-type;
description
"Indicates Ethernet OAM Y.1731 as the performance monitoring
metric source.";
reference
"ITU-T Y.1731: Operations, administration and
maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms
for Ethernet-based networks";
}
identity pm-source-ioam {
base pm-source-type;
description
"Indicates In Situ Operations, Administration, and Maintenance
(IOAM) as the performance monitoring metric source.";
reference
"RFC 9197: Data Fields for In Situ Operations, Administration,
and Maintenance (IOAM)";
}
identity pm-type {
description
"Base identity for the PM type.";
}
identity pm-type-network-link {
base pm-type;
description
"Indicates that the PM type is for the link in
the network topology.";
}
identity pm-type-vpn-inter-access {
base pm-type;
description
"Indicates that the PM type is for logical point-to-point VPN
connections between source and destination VPN access
interfaces.";
}
identity pm-type-vpn-tunnel {
base pm-type;
description
"Indicates that the PM type is for VPN tunnels.";
}
typedef percentage {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 5;
range "0..100";
}
description
"Percentage to 5 decimal places.";
}
typedef percentile {
type decimal64 {
fraction-digits 3;
range "0..100";
}
description
"The percentile is a value between 0 and 100 to 3
decimal places, e.g., 10.000, 99.900, and 99.990.
For example, for a given one-way delay measurement,
if the percentile is set to 95.000 and the 95th percentile
one-way delay is 2 milliseconds, then the 95 percent of
the sample value is less than or equal to 2 milliseconds.";
}
grouping entry-summary {
description
"Entry summary grouping used for network topology
augmentation.";
container entry-summary {
config false;
description
"Container for VPN or network entry summary.";
container ipv4-num {
leaf maximum-routes {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates the maximum number of IPv4 routes
for the VPN or network.";
}
leaf total-active-routes {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates total active IPv4 routes
for the VPN or network.";
}
description
"IPv4-specific parameters.";
}
container ipv6-num {
leaf maximum-routes {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates the maximum number of IPv6 routes
for the VPN or network.";
}
leaf total-active-routes {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates total active IPv6 routes
for the VPN or network.";
}
description
"IPv6-specific parameters.";
}
container mac-num {
leaf maximum-mac-entries {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates the maximum number of MAC entries
for the VPN or network.";
}
leaf total-active-mac-entries {
type uint32;
description
"Indicates the total active MAC entries
for the VPN or network.";
}
description
"MAC statistics.";
}
}
}
grouping link-loss-statistics {
description
"Grouping for per-link error statistics.";
container loss-statistics {
description
"One-way link loss summarized information.";
reference
"RFC 4656: A One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP)
ITU-T Y.1731: Operations, administration and
maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms
for Ethernet-based networks";
leaf packet-loss-count {
type yang:counter64;
description
"Total number of lost packets.";
}
leaf loss-ratio {
type percentage;
description
"Loss ratio of the packets. Expressed as percentage
of packets lost with respect to packets sent.";
}
}
}
grouping link-delay-statistics {
description
"Grouping for per-link delay statistics.";
container delay-statistics {
description
"One-way link delay summarized information.";
reference
"RFC 4656: A One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP)
ITU-T Y.1731: Operations, administration and
maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms
for Ethernet-based networks";
leaf unit-value {
type identityref {
base lime:time-unit-type;
}
default "lime:milliseconds";
description
"Time units, where the options are hours, minutes, seconds,
milliseconds, microseconds, and nanoseconds.";
}
leaf min-delay-value {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Minimum observed one-way delay.";
}
leaf max-delay-value {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Maximum observed one-way delay.";
}
leaf low-delay-percentile {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Low percentile of observed one-way delay with
specific measurement method.";
}
leaf intermediate-delay-percentile {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Intermediate percentile of observed one-way delay with
specific measurement method.";
}
leaf high-delay-percentile {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"High percentile of observed one-way delay with
specific measurement method.";
}
}
}
grouping link-jitter-statistics {
description
"Grouping for per-link jitter statistics.";
container jitter-statistics {
description
"One-way link jitter summarized information.";
reference
"RFC 3393: IP Packet Delay Variation Metric
for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)
RFC 4656: A One-way Active Measurement Protocol (OWAMP)
ITU-T Y.1731: Operations, administration and
maintenance (OAM) functions and mechanisms
for Ethernet-based networks";
leaf unit-value {
type identityref {
base lime:time-unit-type;
}
default "lime:milliseconds";
description
"Time units, where the options are hours, minutes, seconds,
milliseconds, microseconds, and nanoseconds.";
}
leaf min-jitter-value {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Minimum observed one-way jitter.";
}
leaf max-jitter-value {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Maximum observed one-way jitter.";
}
leaf low-jitter-percentile {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Low percentile of observed one-way jitter.";
}
leaf intermediate-jitter-percentile {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"Intermediate percentile of observed one-way jitter.";
}
leaf high-jitter-percentile {
type yang:gauge64;
description
"High percentile of observed one-way jitter.";
}
}
}
grouping tp-svc-telemetry {
leaf last-updated {
type yang:date-and-time;
config false;
description
"Indicates the date and time when the counters were
last updated.";
}
leaf inbound-octets {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of octets received on the
interface, including framing characters.";
}
leaf inbound-unicast {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of inbound unicast packets.";
}
leaf inbound-broadcast {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of inbound broadcast packets.";
}
leaf inbound-multicast {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of inbound multicast packets.";
}
leaf inbound-discards {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of inbound packets that were discarded
even though no errors had been detected. Possible
reasons for discarding such a packet could be to
free up buffer space, not enough buffer for too
much data, etc.";
}
leaf inbound-errors {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of inbound packets that contained errors.";
}
leaf inbound-unknown-protocol {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of packets received via the interface
that were discarded because of an unknown or
unsupported protocol.";
}
leaf outbound-octets {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of octets transmitted out of the
interface, including framing characters.";
}
leaf outbound-unicast {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of outbound unicast packets.";
}
leaf outbound-broadcast {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of outbound broadcast packets.";
}
leaf outbound-multicast {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The total number of outbound multicast packets.";
}
leaf outbound-discards {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of outbound packets that were discarded
even though no errors had been detected to
prevent their transmission. Possible reasons
for discarding such a packet could be to free
up buffer space, not enough buffer for too
much data, etc.";
}
leaf outbound-errors {
type yang:counter64;
description
"The number of outbound packets that contained errors.";
}
description
"Grouping for interface service telemetry.";
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types" {
description
"Defines the service topologies types.";
container service {
presence "Presence of the container indicates performance
monitoring of the VPN service, and absence of
the container indicates performance monitoring
of the network itself.";
description
"Container for VPN service.";
leaf service-type {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:service-type;
}
mandatory true;
description
"This indicates the network service type,
e.g., L3VPN and VPLS.";
}
leaf vpn-id {
type vpn-common:vpn-id;
description
"VPN identifier.";
}
leaf vpn-service-topology {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:vpn-topology;
}
description
"VPN service topology, e.g., hub-spoke, any-to-any,
and hub-spoke-disjoint.";
}
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" {
description
"Augments the network node with other general attributes.";
leaf node-type {
type identityref {
base node-type;
}
description
"Node type, e.g., PE, P, and ASBR.";
}
uses entry-summary;
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node" {
when '../nw:network-types/nvp:service' {
description
"Augments for VPN service PM.";
}
description
"Augments the network node with VPN service attributes.";
leaf role {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:role;
}
default "vpn-common:any-to-any-role";
description
"Role of the node in the VPN service topology.";
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link" {
description
"Augments the network topology link with performance
monitoring attributes.";
container perf-mon {
description
"Container for PM attributes.";
leaf low-percentile {
type percentile;
default "10.000";
description
"Low percentile to report. Setting low-percentile
to 0.000 indicates the client is not interested
in receiving low percentile.";
}
leaf intermediate-percentile {
type percentile;
default "50.000";
description
"Intermediate percentile to report. Setting
intermediate-percentile to 0.000 indicates the client
is not interested in receiving intermediate percentile.";
}
leaf high-percentile {
type percentile;
default "95.000";
description
"High percentile to report. Setting high-percentile
to 0.000 indicates the client is not interested in
receiving high percentile.";
}
leaf measurement-interval {
type uint32 {
range "1..max";
}
units "seconds";
default "60";
description
"Indicates the time interval to perform PM
measurement over.";
}
list pm {
key "pm-type";
config false;
description
"The list of PM based on PM type.";
leaf pm-type {
type identityref {
base pm-type;
}
config false;
description
"The PM type of the measured PM attributes.";
}
container pm-attributes {
description
"Container for PM attributes.";
leaf start-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
config false;
description
"The date and time the measurement last started.";
}
leaf end-time {
type yang:date-and-time;
config false;
description
"The date and time the measurement last ended.";
}
leaf pm-source {
type identityref {
base pm-source-type;
}
config false;
description
"The OAM tool used to collect the PM data.";
}
container one-way-pm-statistics {
config false;
description
"Container for link telemetry attributes.";
uses link-loss-statistics;
uses link-delay-statistics;
uses link-jitter-statistics;
}
list one-way-pm-statistics-per-class {
key "class-id";
config false;
description
"The list of PM data based on class of service.";
leaf class-id {
type string;
description
"The class-id is used to identify the class
of service. This identifier is internal
to the administration.";
}
uses link-loss-statistics;
uses link-delay-statistics;
uses link-jitter-statistics;
}
}
}
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link/perf-mon" {
when '../../nw:network-types/nvp:service' {
description
"Augments for VPN service PM.";
}
description
"Augments the network topology link with VPN service
performance monitoring attributes.";
container vpn-pm-type {
description
"The VPN PM type of this logical point-to-point
unidirectional VPN link.";
container inter-vpn-access-interface {
description
"Indicates inter-vpn-access-interface PM, which is used
to monitor the performance of logical point-to-point
VPN connections between source and destination VPN
access interfaces.";
leaf inter-vpn-access-interface {
type empty;
description
"This is a placeholder for inter-vpn-access-interface PM,
which is not bound to a specific VPN access interface.
The source or destination VPN access interface
of the measurement can be augmented as needed.";
}
}
container vpn-tunnel {
presence "Enables VPN tunnel PM";
description
"Indicates VPN tunnel PM, which is used to monitor
the performance of VPN tunnels.";
leaf vpn-tunnel-type {
type identityref {
base vpn-common:protocol-type;
}
config false;
description
"The leaf indicates the VPN tunnel type, e.g.,
Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE) and Generic
Network Virtualization Encapsulation (Geneve).";
}
}
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point" {
description
"Augments the network topology termination point with
performance monitoring attributes.";
container pm-statistics {
config false;
description
"Container for termination point PM attributes.";
uses tp-svc-telemetry;
}
}
augment "/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node"
+ "/nt:termination-point/pm-statistics" {
when '../../../nw:network-types/nvp:service' {
description
"Augments for VPN service PM.";
}
description
"Augments the network topology termination-point with
VPN service performance monitoring attributes.";
list vpn-network-access {
key "network-access-id";
description
"The list of PM based on VPN network accesses.";
leaf network-access-id {
type vpn-common:vpn-id;
description
"The reference to an identifier for the VPN network
access.";
}
uses tp-svc-telemetry;
}
}
}
<CODE ENDS>
6. Security Considerations
The YANG module specified in this document defines a schema for data
that is designed to be accessed via network management protocols such
as NETCONF [RFC6241] or RESTCONF [RFC8040]. The lowest NETCONF layer
is the secure transport layer, and the mandatory-to-implement secure
transport is Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC6242]. The lowest RESTCONF layer
is HTTPS, and the mandatory-to-implement secure transport is TLS
[RFC8446].
The Network Configuration Access Control Model (NACM) [RFC8341]
provides the means to restrict access for particular NETCONF or
RESTCONF users to a preconfigured subset of all available NETCONF or
RESTCONF protocol operations and content.
There are a number of data nodes defined in this YANG module that are
writable/creatable/deletable (i.e., config true, which is the
default). These data nodes may be considered sensitive or vulnerable
in some network environments. Write operations (e.g., edit-config)
to these data nodes without proper protection can have a negative
effect on network operations. These write operations can lead to
inaccurate or incomplete network measurements that can impact the
visibility and decisions this data would be used to inform.
Unauthorized write access to the following subtrees could have the
following impacts:
+============+======================+============================+
| Access | Node | Potential Impact |
+============+======================+============================+
| /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:network-types |
+============+======================+============================+
| write | service type | disable VPN PM |
+------------+----------------------+----------------------------+
| write | VPN identifier | disable VPN PM |
+------------+----------------------+----------------------------+
| write | VPN service topology | render data unusable |
+============+======================+============================+
| /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node |
+============+======================+============================+
| write | node type | render data unusable |
+------------+----------------------+----------------------------+
| write | VPN topology role | render data unusable |
+============+======================+============================+
| /nw:networks/nw:network/nw:link/nvp:perf-mon |
+============+======================+============================+
| write | percentile | impact reporting cadence |
+------------+----------------------+----------------------------+
| write | measurement interval | impact monitoring fidelity |
+------------+----------------------+----------------------------+
| write | vpn-pm-type | impact monitoring fidelity |
+------------+----------------------+----------------------------+
Table 1: Write Operation Sensitivity Impact
Some of the readable data nodes in this YANG module may be considered
sensitive or vulnerable in some network environments. It is thus
important to control read access (e.g., via get, get-config, or
notification) to these data nodes. When using, the trade-off between
confidentiality and proper monitoring of performance needs to be
considered. Unauthorized access to the following subtrees could have
the following impacts:
"/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node": Unauthorized read access to this
subtree can disclose the operational state information of underlay
network instances or VPN instances.
"/nw:networks/nw:network/nt:link/nvp:perf-mon/nvp:one-way-pm-
statistics": Unauthorized read access to this subtree can disclose
the operational state information of underlay network links or VPN
abstract links.
"/nw:networks/nw:network/nw:node/nt:termination-point/nvp:pm-
statistics": Unauthorized read access to this subtree can disclose
the operational state information of underlay network termination
points or VPN network accesses.
This YANG module does not define any Remote Procedure Call (RPC)
operations and actions.
7. IANA Considerations
IANA has registered the following URI in the "ns" subregistry within
the "IETF XML Registry" [RFC3688]:
URI: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-vpn-pm
Registrant Contact: The IESG.
XML: N/A; the requested URI is an XML namespace.
IANA has registered the following YANG module in the "YANG Module
Names" subregistry [RFC6020] within the "YANG Parameters" registry.
Name: ietf-network-vpn-pm
Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:yang:ietf-network-vpn-pm
Maintained by IANA: N
Prefix: nvp
Reference: RFC 9375
8. References
8.1. Normative References
[RFC3393] Demichelis, C. and P. Chimento, "IP Packet Delay Variation
Metric for IP Performance Metrics (IPPM)", RFC 3393,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3393, November 2002,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3393>.
[RFC3688] Mealling, M., "The IETF XML Registry", BCP 81, RFC 3688,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3688, January 2004,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3688>.
[RFC4364] Rosen, E. and Y. Rekhter, "BGP/MPLS IP Virtual Private
Networks (VPNs)", RFC 4364, DOI 10.17487/RFC4364, February
2006, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4364>.
[RFC4656] Shalunov, S., Teitelbaum, B., Karp, A., Boote, J., and M.
Zekauskas, "A One-way Active Measurement Protocol
(OWAMP)", RFC 4656, DOI 10.17487/RFC4656, September 2006,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4656>.
[RFC5357] Hedayat, K., Krzanowski, R., Morton, A., Yum, K., and J.
Babiarz, "A Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol (TWAMP)",
RFC 5357, DOI 10.17487/RFC5357, October 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5357>.
[RFC6020] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "YANG - A Data Modeling Language for
the Network Configuration Protocol (NETCONF)", RFC 6020,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6020, October 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6020>.
[RFC6241] Enns, R., Ed., Bjorklund, M., Ed., Schoenwaelder, J., Ed.,
and A. Bierman, Ed., "Network Configuration Protocol
(NETCONF)", RFC 6241, DOI 10.17487/RFC6241, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6241>.
[RFC6242] Wasserman, M., "Using the NETCONF Protocol over Secure
Shell (SSH)", RFC 6242, DOI 10.17487/RFC6242, June 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6242>.
[RFC6374] Frost, D. and S. Bryant, "Packet Loss and Delay
Measurement for MPLS Networks", RFC 6374,
DOI 10.17487/RFC6374, September 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6374>.
[RFC6991] Schoenwaelder, J., Ed., "Common YANG Data Types",
RFC 6991, DOI 10.17487/RFC6991, July 2013,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6991>.
[RFC7950] Bjorklund, M., Ed., "The YANG 1.1 Data Modeling Language",
RFC 7950, DOI 10.17487/RFC7950, August 2016,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7950>.
[RFC8040] Bierman, A., Bjorklund, M., and K. Watsen, "RESTCONF
Protocol", RFC 8040, DOI 10.17487/RFC8040, January 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8040>.
[RFC8340] Bjorklund, M. and L. Berger, Ed., "YANG Tree Diagrams",
BCP 215, RFC 8340, DOI 10.17487/RFC8340, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8340>.
[RFC8341] Bierman, A. and M. Bjorklund, "Network Configuration
Access Control Model", STD 91, RFC 8341,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8341, March 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8341>.
[RFC8345] Clemm, A., Medved, J., Varga, R., Bahadur, N.,
Ananthakrishnan, H., and X. Liu, "A YANG Data Model for
Network Topologies", RFC 8345, DOI 10.17487/RFC8345, March
2018, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8345>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
[RFC8532] Kumar, D., Wang, Z., Wu, Q., Ed., Rahman, R., and S.
Raghavan, "Generic YANG Data Model for the Management of
Operations, Administration, and Maintenance (OAM)
Protocols That Use Connectionless Communications",
RFC 8532, DOI 10.17487/RFC8532, April 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8532>.
[RFC8571] Ginsberg, L., Ed., Previdi, S., Wu, Q., Tantsura, J., and
C. Filsfils, "BGP - Link State (BGP-LS) Advertisement of
IGP Traffic Engineering Performance Metric Extensions",
RFC 8571, DOI 10.17487/RFC8571, March 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8571>.
[RFC8641] Clemm, A. and E. Voit, "Subscription to YANG Notifications
for Datastore Updates", RFC 8641, DOI 10.17487/RFC8641,
September 2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8641>.
[RFC8762] Mirsky, G., Jun, G., Nydell, H., and R. Foote, "Simple
Two-Way Active Measurement Protocol", RFC 8762,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8762, March 2020,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8762>.
[RFC9181] Barguil, S., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Boucadair, M.,
Ed., and Q. Wu, "A Common YANG Data Model for Layer 2 and
Layer 3 VPNs", RFC 9181, DOI 10.17487/RFC9181, February
2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9181>.
8.2. Informative References
[ITU-T-Y-1731]
ITU-T, "Operations, administration and maintenance (OAM)
functions and mechanisms for Ethernet-based networks",
ITU-T Recommendation G.8013/Y.1731, August 2015,
<https://www.itu.int/rec/T-REC-Y.1731/en>.
[RFC4026] Andersson, L. and T. Madsen, "Provider Provisioned Virtual
Private Network (VPN) Terminology", RFC 4026,
DOI 10.17487/RFC4026, March 2005,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc4026>.
[RFC5277] Chisholm, S. and H. Trevino, "NETCONF Event
Notifications", RFC 5277, DOI 10.17487/RFC5277, July 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5277>.
[RFC7471] Giacalone, S., Ward, D., Drake, J., Atlas, A., and S.
Previdi, "OSPF Traffic Engineering (TE) Metric
Extensions", RFC 7471, DOI 10.17487/RFC7471, March 2015,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7471>.
[RFC8194] Schoenwaelder, J. and V. Bajpai, "A YANG Data Model for
LMAP Measurement Agents", RFC 8194, DOI 10.17487/RFC8194,
August 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8194>.
[RFC8309] Wu, Q., Liu, W., and A. Farrel, "Service Models
Explained", RFC 8309, DOI 10.17487/RFC8309, January 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8309>.
[RFC8570] Ginsberg, L., Ed., Previdi, S., Ed., Giacalone, S., Ward,
D., Drake, J., and Q. Wu, "IS-IS Traffic Engineering (TE)
Metric Extensions", RFC 8570, DOI 10.17487/RFC8570, March
2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8570>.
[RFC8632] Vallin, S. and M. Bjorklund, "A YANG Data Model for Alarm
Management", RFC 8632, DOI 10.17487/RFC8632, September
2019, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8632>.
[RFC8639] Voit, E., Clemm, A., Gonzalez Prieto, A., Nilsen-Nygaard,
E., and A. Tripathy, "Subscription to YANG Notifications",
RFC 8639, DOI 10.17487/RFC8639, September 2019,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8639>.
[RFC8969] Wu, Q., Ed., Boucadair, M., Ed., Lopez, D., Xie, C., and
L. Geng, "A Framework for Automating Service and Network
Management with YANG", RFC 8969, DOI 10.17487/RFC8969,
January 2021, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8969>.
[RFC9182] Barguil, S., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Boucadair, M.,
Ed., Munoz, L., and A. Aguado, "A YANG Network Data Model
for Layer 3 VPNs", RFC 9182, DOI 10.17487/RFC9182,
February 2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9182>.
[RFC9197] Brockners, F., Ed., Bhandari, S., Ed., and T. Mizrahi,
Ed., "Data Fields for In Situ Operations, Administration,
and Maintenance (IOAM)", RFC 9197, DOI 10.17487/RFC9197,
May 2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9197>.
[RFC9291] Boucadair, M., Ed., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Ed., Barguil,
S., and L. Munoz, "A YANG Network Data Model for Layer 2
VPNs", RFC 9291, DOI 10.17487/RFC9291, September 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9291>.
[YANG-SAP] Boucadair, M., Ed., Gonzalez de Dios, O., Barguil, S., Wu,
Q., and V. Lopez, "A YANG Network Model for Service
Attachment Points (SAPs)", Work in Progress, Internet-
Draft, draft-ietf-opsawg-sap-15, 18 January 2023,
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-opsawg-
sap-15>.
Appendix A. Illustrative Examples
A.1. Example of VPN Performance Subscription
The example shown in Figure 7 illustrates how a client subscribes to
the performance monitoring information between nodes ("node-id") A
and B in the L3 network topology. The performance monitoring
parameter that the client is interested in is end-to-end loss.
============== NOTE: '\' line wrapping per RFC 8792 ===============
POST /restconf/operations/ietf-subscribed-notifications:establish-\
subscription
Host: example.com
Content-Type: application/yang-data+json
{
"ietf-subscribed-notifications:input": {
"stream-subtree-filter": {
"ietf-network:networks": {
"network": {
"network-id": "example:VPN1",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:service": {
"service-type": "ietf-vpn-common:l3vpn"
},
"node": [
{
"node-id": "example:A",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:node-type": "pe",
"termination-point": [
{
"tp-id": "example:1-0-1"
}
]
},
{
"node-id": "example:B",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:node-type": "pe",
"termination-point": [
{
"tp-id": "example:2-0-1"
}
]
}
],
"ietf-network-topology:link": [
{
"link-id": "example:A-B",
"source": {
"source-node": "example:A"
},
"destination": {
"dest-node": "example:B"
},
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:perf-mon": {
"pm": [
{
"pm-type": "pm-type-vpn-tunnel",
"pm-attributes": {
"one-way-pm-statistics": {
"loss-statistics": {
"packet-loss-count": {}
}
}
}
}
],
"vpn-pm-type": {
"vpn-tunnel": {
"vpn-tunnel-type": "ietf-vpn-common:gre"
}
}
}
}
]
}
},
"ietf-yang-push:periodic": {
"period": "500"
}
}
}
}
Figure 7: Example of Pub/Sub Retrieval
A.2. Example of VPN Performance Snapshot
The example depicted in Figure 8 illustrates a VPN PM instance
message body of a RESTCONF request to fetch the performance data of
the link and TP that belongs to "VPN1".
{
"ietf-network:networks": {
"network": {
"network-id": "example:VPN1",
"node": [
{
"node-id": "example:A",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:node-type": "pe",
"termination-point": [
{
"tp-id": "example:1-0-1",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:pm-statistics": {
"inbound-octets": "100",
"outbound-octets": "150"
}
}
]
},
{
"node-id": "example:B",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:node-type": "pe",
"termination-point": [
{
"tp-id": "example:2-0-1",
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:pm-statistics": {
"inbound-octets": "150",
"outbound-octets": "100"
}
}
]
}
],
"ietf-network-topology:link": [
{
"link-id": "example:A-B",
"source": {
"source-node": "example:A"
},
"destination": {
"dest-node": "example:B"
},
"ietf-network-pm:perf-mon": {
"pm": [
{
"pm-type": "pm-type-vpn-tunnel",
"pm-attributes": {
"one-way-pm-statistics": {
"loss-statistics": {
"packet-loss-count": "120"
}
}
}
}
],
"vpn-pm-type": {
"vpn-tunnel": {
"vpn-tunnel-type": "ietf-vpn-common:gre"
}
}
}
}
]
}
}
}
Figure 8: Example of VPN PM
A.3. Example of Percentile Monitoring
This is an example of percentile measurement data that could be
returned for link "example:A-B" between "example:A" and "example:B".
{
"ietf-network-topology:link": [
{
"link-id": "example:A-B",
"source": {
"source-node": "example:A"
},
"destination": {
"dest-node": "example:B"
},
"ietf-network-vpn-pm:perf-mon": {
"low-percentile": "20.000",
"intermediate-percentile": "50.000",
"high-percentile": "90.000",
"pm": [
{
"pm-type": "pm-type-vpn-inter-access",
"pm-attributes": {
"one-way-pm-statistics": {
"delay-statistics": {
"unit-value": "ietf-lime-time-types:milliseconds",
"min-delay-value": "43",
"max-delay-value": "99",
"low-delay-percentile": "64",
"intermediate-delay-percentile": "77",
"high-delay-percentile": "98"
}
}
}
}
],
"vpn-pm-type": {
"inter-vpn-access-interface": {
"inter-vpn-access-interface": [null]
}
}
}
}
]
}
Figure 9: Example of VPN PM with Percentile Value
Acknowledgements
Thanks to Joe Clarke, Adrian Farrel, Tom Petch, Greg Mirsky, Roque
Gagliano, Erez Segev, and Dhruv Dhody for reviewing and providing
important input to this document.
This work is partially supported by the European Commission under
Horizon 2020 Secured autonomic traffic management for a Tera of SDN
flows (Teraflow) project (grant agreement number 101015857).
Contributors
The following authors contributed significantly to this document:
Michale Wang
Huawei
Email: wangzitao@huawei.com
Roni Even
Huawei
Email: ron.even.tlv@gmail.com
Change Liu
China Unicom
Email: liuc131@chinaunicom.cn
Honglei Xu
China Telecom
Email: xuhl6@chinatelecom.cn
Authors' Addresses
Bo Wu (editor)
Huawei
Yuhua District
101 Software Avenue
Nanjing
Jiangsu, 210012
China
Email: lana.wubo@huawei.com
Qin Wu (editor)
Huawei
Yuhua District
101 Software Avenue
Nanjing
Jiangsu, 210012
China
Email: bill.wu@huawei.com
Mohamed Boucadair (editor)
Orange
Rennes 35000
France
Email: mohamed.boucadair@orange.com
Oscar Gonzalez de Dios
Telefonica
Madrid
Spain
Email: oscar.gonzalezdedios@telefonica.com
Bin Wen
Comcast
Email: bin_wen@comcast.com