💾 Archived View for gemi.dev › gemini-mailing-list › 000632.gmi captured on 2024-06-16 at 13:59:13. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-12-28)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Does anyone have an thoughts or experience running hidden sites using Gemini? It seems like a great pairing. The simplicity of the Gemini servers and (typical) use of static only content leave very little to attack or exploit on the end point. Handy for keeping those hidden services... hidden. The lack of privacy destroying features mean that, for the client side, the risk of client deanonymization should be much less. No cookies, WebRTC, JavaScript, etc. I did a little bit of experimentation and running a Gemini as a hidden service worked easily enough. Running Lagrange and a couple of other clients through Torify worked on the client side. I think I'm going to move forward and build up my Gemlog as a hidden site. Is anyone else doing something like this, or have any interest in doing so? I'm also thinking it would be interesting to setup something like Capcom for hidden Gemlogs, if it doesn't already exist. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20210123/c05d 17ff/attachment.htm>
On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 11:43:07PM +0000,
shardiame <shardiame at disroot.org> wrote
a message of 46 lines which said:
> Does anyone have an thoughts or experience running hidden sites
> using Gemini?
Checking the Lupa <gemini://gemini.bortzmeyer.org/software/lupa/> database
seems to indicate that there are at least two onion capsules:
lupa=> SELECT name FROM capsules WHERE name LIKE '%.onion';
name
----------------------------------------------------------------
fgc2df7jssqt7adacvhinvwdjmn4gwfp6fqxczxunw4qtb37554yexyd.onion
black6kfjetfuzaeozz7fs53whh7xtd4e27telrf5fg5kgdt5ah5plad.onion
(2 rows)
---