💾 Archived View for midnight.pub › replies › 4213 captured on 2024-05-26 at 16:34:47. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2022-06-04)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Thanks for your detailed reply! I've been out of town and unable to respond. I think you're right, at least in the case of the Magnus Archives (of which I've heard an episode or two, but not a lot).
I do think that speculative fiction, generally, is used to help think and talk about things that are uncomfortable to face in themselves. But this can be done with SF that is much more optimistic than horror --- consider Star Trek TOS dealing with Space Racism and Space Imperialism, the utopian society in ST TNG dealing with its dystopian past (TNG: Encounter at Farpoint, DS9:Past Tense) and questions about whether it is living up to its ideals more generally (DS9). But these all imply that the problem is solvable, by showing a society in which these problems are more-or-less solved, or at least where a solution is possible.
What about horror? Is horror the SF of hopelessness? Or am I projecting cosmic horror onto a wider genre that has room for hope (e.g., Dracula is staked in the end)?
So, for horror non-fiction, I'm including literary criticism of horror, philosophy of horror, horror of philosophy, and philosophical pessimism, mainly. But I'm also looking at fundamentally pessimistic non-fiction generally, the literature of climate change and collapse.