💾 Archived View for gemi.dev › gemini-mailing-list › 000115.gmi captured on 2024-05-26 at 15:18:52. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Someone's client struggles with relative URLs

📧 Messages: 2
🗣️ Authors: 2
📅 First Message: 2020-05-19 17:34
📅 Last Message: 2020-05-19 17:45

1. Andrew Kennedy (andrew (a) 68kmentat.com)

📅 Sent: 2020-05-19 17:34
📧 Message 1 of 2

checking my logs, and noticed a client that was tacking relative URLs onto 
the current document, instead of the current folder. Maybe I'm wrong, but 
that sounds like wrong behavior on the client's end to me. Here's the logs:

,,,
May 19 13:09:13 raspberrypi jetforce[343]: 92.8.xxx.xx 
[19/May/2020:13:09:13 -0400] 
"gemini://gemini.68kmentat.com:1965/updates.gmi/nilog/" 51 "Not Found" 14
May 19 13:09:21 raspberrypi jetforce[343]: 92.8.xxx.xx 
[19/May/2020:13:09:21 -0400] 
"gemini://gemini.68kmentat.com:1965/updates.gmi/updates.gmi" 51 "Not Found" 14
,,,

and the links in gemini://gemini.68kmentat.com/updates.gmi:

,,,
=> updates.gmi Updates - now have an update log
=> nilog/ Nilog - new Nilog entry
,,,

I don't really understand how the client managed to get to updates.gmi, 
since that is also relatively linked in my index.gmi. But hopefully the 
dev will read this e-mail if they didn't already know about the issue.

- Andrew
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20200519/8d9e
3766/attachment.htm>

Link to individual message.

2. Luke Emmet (luke.emmet (a) gmail.com)

📅 Sent: 2020-05-19 17:45
📧 Message 2 of 2

On 19-May-2020 18:34, Andrew Kennedy wrote:
> checking my logs, and noticed a client that was tacking relative URLs 
> onto the current document, instead of the current folder. Maybe I'm 
> wrong, but that sounds like wrong behavior on the client's end to me. 
> Here's the logs:
>
> I don't really understand how the client managed to get to 
> updates.gmi, since that is also relatively linked in my index.gmi. But 
> hopefully the dev will read this e-mail if they didn't already know 
> about the issue.
Thanks for that - its probably me - I'm testing a new client. Still a 
few things to fix before announcing, like this broken URL assembly 
behaviour...

Or maybe I was testing the robustness of your server by requesting 
broken urls ;-)

  - Luke

Link to individual message.

---

Previous Thread: Extra GUS crawling this morning

Next Thread: [ANN] Moonlander: The fanciest Gemini client in the entiresolar system