💾 Archived View for gemini.bunburya.eu › newsgroups › gemini › messages › ta3db7$12np$1@gioia.aioe.o… captured on 2024-05-26 at 15:13:27. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2022-07-16)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From: Christian Seibold <krixano@mailbox.org>
Subject: Re: Intend to standardize via RFC?
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2022 02:24:23 -0500
Message-ID: <ta3db7$12np$1@gioia.aioe.org>
On 5/30/2022 6:54 PM, danrl wrote:
On 2022-05-30, Szczezuja.space <szczezuja@sdf.org> wrote:
> On 2022-05-30, Dan Luedtke <d@x.gl> wrote:
>> Furthermore, the specification is a bit blurry around the edges
>> as Stephane Bortzmeyer pointed out a while ago.
>
> Could you write something more. Is it on this group? I can't find it
> probably.
Here you go:
=> gemini://gemini.bortzmeyer.org/gemini/missing.gmi
Some of the things on that page have already been fixed. Other things
are more questioning the spec (particularly TOFU), and other things have
had fairly active discussions (URIs) on the repos. Also, this list
doesn't look like it's getting updated often.
Parent:
Re: Intend to standardize via RFC? (by danrl <d@x.gl> on Mon, 30 May 2022 23:54:54 -0000 (UTC))
Start of thread:
Intend to standardize via RFC? (by Dan Luedtke <d@x.gl> on Mon, 30 May 2022 02:49:03 -0000 (UTC))