💾 Archived View for siiky.srht.site › wiki › p.arthur_miller.why_i_wrote_the_crucible.gmi captured on 2024-05-26 at 15:02:17. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Arthur Miller, "Why I Wrote “The Crucible”"

siiky

2023/10/22

post,politics,society,psychology,anarchism

https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/1996/10/21/why-i-wrote-the-crucible

I had read about the witchcraft trials in college, but it was not until I read a book published in 1867—a two-volume, thousand-page study by Charles W. Upham, who was then the mayor of Salem—that I knew I had to write about the period. Upham had not only written a broad and thorough investigation of what was even then an almost lost chapter of Salem’s past but opened up to me the details of personal relationships among many participants in the tragedy.

I believe this book he mentions is the following:

Charles Wentworth Upham, "Salem Witchcraft"

Of course, there were no Communists in 1692, but it was literally worth your life to deny witches or their powers, given the exhortation in the Bible, “Thou shalt not suffer a witch to live.” There had to be witches in the world or the Bible lied. Indeed, the very structure of evil depended on Lucifer’s plotting against God.

One thing more—something wonderful in the old sense of that word. I recall the weeks I spent reading testimony by the tome, commentaries, broadsides, confessions, and accusations. And always the crucial damning event was the signing of one’s name in “the Devil’s book.” This Faustian agreement to hand over one’s soul to the dreaded Lord of Darkness was the ultimate insult to God. But what were these new inductees supposed to have done once they’d signed on? Nobody seems even to have thought to ask. But, of course, actions are as irrelevant during cultural and religious wars as they are in nightmares. The thing at issue is buried intentions—the secret allegiances of the alienated heart, always the main threat to the theocratic mind, as well as its immemorial quarry.