💾 Archived View for gemini.bortzmeyer.org › rfc-mirror › rfc9456.txt captured on 2024-05-26 at 14:57:58.
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-11-14)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) K. Vaughn, Ed.
Request for Comments: 9456 Trevilon LLC
Updates: 6353 November 2023
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721
Updates to the TLS Transport Model for SNMP
Abstract
This document updates RFC 6353 ("Transport Layer Security (TLS)
Transport Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)")
to reflect changes necessary to support Transport Layer Security
version 1.3 (TLS 1.3) and Datagram Transport Layer Security version
1.3 (DTLS 1.3), which are jointly known as "(D)TLS 1.3". This
document is compatible with (D)TLS 1.2 and is intended to be
compatible with future versions of SNMP and (D)TLS.
This document updates the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB as defined in RFC 6353.
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 7841.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9456.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Revised BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of the
Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as described
in the Revised BSD License.
Table of Contents
1. Introduction
1.1. The Internet-Standard Management Framework
1.2. Conventions
2. Changes from RFC 6353
2.1. TLSTM Fingerprint
2.2. Security Level
2.3. (D)TLS Version
3. Additional Rules for TLS 1.3
3.1. Zero Round-Trip Time Resumption (0-RTT)
3.2. TLS Cipher Suites, Extensions, and Protocol Invariants
4. MIB Module Definitions
5. Security Considerations
6. IANA Considerations
7. References
7.1. Normative References
7.2. Informative References
Acknowledgements
Author's Address
1. Introduction
This document updates and clarifies how the rules of [RFC6353] apply
when using Transport Layer Security (TLS) or Datagram Transport Layer
Security (DTLS) versions later than 1.2. This document jointly
refers to these two protocols as "(D)TLS". The update also
emphasizes the requirement in [RFC8996] prohibiting the use of TLS
versions prior to TLS 1.2 [RFC5246] when using SNMP. Although the
text of this document specifically references SNMPv3 and (D)TLS 1.3,
this document may be applicable to future versions of these protocols
and is backwards compatible with (D)TLS 1.2.
1.1. The Internet-Standard Management Framework
For a detailed overview of the documents that describe the current
Internet-Standard Management Framework, please refer to Section 7 of
[RFC3410].
Managed objects are accessed via a virtual information store, termed
the Management Information Base or MIB. MIB objects are generally
accessed through the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP).
Objects in the MIB are defined using the mechanisms defined in the
Structure of Management Information (SMI). This memo specifies a MIB
module that is compliant to the SMIv2, which is described in RFCs
2578, 2579, and 2580 [STD58].
1.2. Conventions
Within this document, the terms "TLS", "DTLS", and "(D)TLS" apply to
all versions of the indicated protocols. The term "SNMP" means
"SNMPv3" unless a specific version number is indicated. Specific
version numbers are used when the text needs to emphasize version
numbers.
For consistency with SNMP-related specifications, this document
favors terminology as defined in [STD62], rather than favoring
terminology that is consistent with non-SNMP specifications. This is
consistent with the IESG decision to not require that the SNMP
terminology be modified to match the usage of other non-SNMP
specifications when SNMP was advanced to an Internet Standard.
"Authentication" in this document typically refers to the English
meaning of "serving to prove the authenticity of" the message, not
data source authentication or peer identity authentication. The
terms "manager" and "agent" are not used in this document because, in
the architecture defined in RFC 3411 [STD62], all SNMP entities have
the capability of acting as manager, agent, or both, depending on the
SNMP application types supported in the implementation. Where
distinction is necessary, the application names of command generator,
command responder, notification originator, notification receiver,
and proxy forwarder are used. See "An Architecture for Describing
Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks" (RFC
3411 [STD62]) for further information.
Throughout this document, the terms "client" and "server" are used to
refer to the two ends of the TLS transport connection. The client
actively opens the TLS connection, and the server passively listens
for the incoming TLS connection. An SNMP entity MAY act as a TLS
client, TLS server, or both, depending on the SNMP applications
supported.
Throughout this document, the term "session" is used to refer to a
secure association between two instances of the TLS Transport Model
(TLSTM) that permits the transmission of one or more SNMP messages
within the lifetime of the session. The TLS protocol also has an
internal notion of a session, and although these two concepts of a
session are related, when the term "session" is used, this document
is referring to the TLSTM's specific session and not directly to the
TLS protocol's session.
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "NOT RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and
"OPTIONAL" in this document are to be interpreted as described in
BCP 14 [RFC2119] [RFC8174] when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here.
2. Changes from RFC 6353
This document updates [RFC6353]. The changes from [RFC6353] are
defined in the following subsections.
2.1. TLSTM Fingerprint
[RFC6353] defines the SnmpTLSFingerprint textual convention to
include the one-octet TLS 1.2 hash algorithm identifier. This one-
octet algorithm identifier is only applicable to (D)TLS protocol
versions prior to 1.3. The TLS community does not plan to ever add
additional values to the "TLS HashAlgorithm" registry [RFC5246],
because some might incorrectly infer that using a new hash algorithm
with TLS 1.2 would overcome the limitations of TLS 1.2. However,
there is still a need within TLSTM to support new values as they are
developed.
This document updates the definition of SnmpTLSFingerprint to clarify
that the one-octet algorithm identifier uses the values in the IANA
"SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms" registry; this registry is consistent
with the IANA "TLS HashAlgorithm" registry for its initial values but
can be extended as needed to support new hashing algorithms without
implying that the new values can be used by TLS version 1.2. This
change allows the reuse of the existing fingerprint textual
convention and minimizes the impact to [RFC6353].
A "Y" in the "Recommended" column (Table 1) indicates that the
registered value has been recommended through a formal Standards
Action [RFC8126]. Not all parameters defined in Standards Track
documents are necessarily marked as "Recommended".
An "N" in the "Recommended" column does not necessarily mean that the
value is flawed; rather, it indicates that the item either has not
been through the IETF consensus process, has limited applicability,
or is intended only for specific use cases.
The initial values for the "SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms" registry are
defined below:
+=========+==========================+=============+============+
| Value | Description | Recommended | References |
+=========+==========================+=============+============+
| 0 | none | N | [RFC5246] |
+---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 1 | md5 | N | [RFC5246] |
+---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 2 | sha1 | N | [RFC5246] |
+---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 3 | sha224 | Y | [RFC5246] |
+---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 4 | sha256 | Y | [RFC5246] |
+---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 5 | sha384 | Y | [RFC5246] |
+---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 6 | sha512 | Y | [RFC5246] |
+---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 7 | Reserved | | [RFC8447] |
+---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 8 | Intrinsic | N | [RFC8422] |
+---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 9-223 | Unassigned | | |
+---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
| 224-255 | Reserved for Private Use | | [RFC5246] |
+---------+--------------------------+-------------+------------+
Table 1: SNMP-TLSTM Hash Algorithms
Values 0 through 2 MUST NOT be used by implementations of this
document but are listed for historical consistency.
2.2. Security Level
The architecture defined in RFC 3411 [STD62] recognizes three levels
of security:
* without authentication and without privacy (noAuthNoPriv)
* with authentication but without privacy (authNoPriv)
* with authentication and with privacy (authPriv)
Cipher suites for (D)TLS 1.3 defined in [RFC8446] provide both
authentication and privacy. Cipher suites defined in [RFC9150] for
(D)TLS 1.3 provide only authentication, without any privacy
protection. Implementations MAY choose to force (D)TLS 1.3 to only
allow cipher suites that provide both authentication and privacy.
2.3. (D)TLS Version
[RFC6353] states that TLSTM clients and servers MUST NOT request,
offer, or use SSL 2.0. [RFC8996] prohibits the use of (D)TLS
versions prior to version 1.2. TLSTM MUST only be used with (D)TLS
versions 1.2 and later.
3. Additional Rules for TLS 1.3
This document specifies additional rules and clarifications for the
use of TLS 1.3. These rules may additionally apply to future
versions of TLS.
3.1. Zero Round-Trip Time Resumption (0-RTT)
TLS 1.3 implementations for SNMP MUST NOT enable the 0-RTT mode of
session resumption (either sending or accepting) and MUST NOT
automatically resend 0-RTT data if it is rejected by the server.
0-RTT is disallowed because there are no "safe" SNMP messages that,
if replayed, will be guaranteed to cause no harm at the server side:
all incoming notifications or command responses are meant to be acted
upon only once. See Section 5 ("Security Considerations") for
further details.
TLSTM clients and servers MUST NOT request, offer, or use the 0-RTT
mode of TLS 1.3. [RFC8446] removed the renegotiation supported in
TLS 1.2 [RFC5246]; for session resumption, it introduced a zero-RTT
(0-RTT) mode, saving a round trip at connection setup at the cost of
increased risk of replay attacks (it is possible for servers to guard
against this attack by keeping track of all the messages received).
[RFC8446] requires that a profile be written for any application that
wants to use 0-RTT, specifying which messages are "safe to use" with
this mode. Within SNMP, there are no messages that are "safe to use"
with this mode.
Renegotiation of sessions is not supported, as it is not supported by
TLS 1.3. If a future version of TLS supports renegotiation, this RFC
should be updated to indicate whether there are any additional
requirements related to its use.
3.2. TLS Cipher Suites, Extensions, and Protocol Invariants
Section 9 of [RFC8446] requires that, in the absence of application
profiles, certain cipher suites, TLS extensions, and TLS protocol
invariants be mandatory to implement. This document does not specify
an application profile; hence, all the compliance requirements in
[RFC8446] apply.
4. MIB Module Definitions
This SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB module imports items from RFCs 2578, 2579, and
2580 [STD58], as well as RFCs 3411 and 3413 [STD62]. It also
references [RFC1123], [RFC5246], [RFC5280], [RFC5591], [RFC5890],
[RFC5952], [RFC5953], [RFC6353], and RFC 2579 [STD58].
<CODE BEGINS> file "SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB"
SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB DEFINITIONS ::= BEGIN
IMPORTS
MODULE-IDENTITY, OBJECT-TYPE,
OBJECT-IDENTITY, mib-2, snmpDomains,
Counter32, Unsigned32, Gauge32, NOTIFICATION-TYPE
FROM SNMPv2-SMI -- RFC 2578 or any update thereof
TEXTUAL-CONVENTION, TimeStamp, RowStatus, StorageType,
AutonomousType
FROM SNMPv2-TC -- RFC 2579 or any update thereof
MODULE-COMPLIANCE, OBJECT-GROUP, NOTIFICATION-GROUP
FROM SNMPv2-CONF -- RFC 2580 or any update thereof
SnmpAdminString
FROM SNMP-FRAMEWORK-MIB -- RFC 3411 or any update thereof
snmpTargetParamsName, snmpTargetAddrName
FROM SNMP-TARGET-MIB -- RFC 3413 or any update thereof
;
snmpTlstmMIB MODULE-IDENTITY
LAST-UPDATED "202311080000Z"
ORGANIZATION "Operations and Management Area Working Group
<mailto:opsawg@ietf.org>"
CONTACT-INFO
"Author: Kenneth Vaughn
<mailto:kvaughn@trevilon.com>"
DESCRIPTION
"This is the MIB module for the TLS Transport Model
(TLSTM).
Copyright (c) 2023 IETF Trust and the persons identified
as authors of the code. All rights reserved.
Redistribution and use in source and binary forms,
with or without modification, is permitted pursuant
to, and subject to the license terms contained in,
the Revised BSD License set forth in Section 4.c
of the IETF Trust's Legal Provisions Relating to IETF
Documents (https://trustee.ietf.org/license-info).
The key words 'MUST', 'MUST NOT', 'REQUIRED', 'SHALL',
'SHALL NOT', 'SHOULD', 'SHOULD NOT', 'RECOMMENDED',
'NOT RECOMMENDED', 'MAY', and 'OPTIONAL' in this document
are to be interpreted as described in BCP 14 (RFC 2119)
(RFC 8174) when, and only when, they appear in all
capitals, as shown here."
REVISION "202311080000Z"
DESCRIPTION
"This version of this MIB module is part of
RFC 9456; see the RFC itself for full legal
notices. This version does the following:
1) Updates the definition of SnmpTLSFingerprint
to clarify the registry used for the one-octet
hash algorithm identifier.
2) Capitalizes key words in conformance with
BCP 14.
3) Replaces 'may not' with 'MUST NOT' to clarify
intent in several locations.
4) Replaces 'may not' with a clarification within
the definition of SnmpTLSAddress.
5) Applies cosmetic grammar improvements and
reformatting causing whitespace changes."
REVISION "201107190000Z"
DESCRIPTION
"This version of this MIB module is part of
RFC 6353; see the RFC itself for full legal
notices. The only change was to introduce
new wording to reflect required changes for
Internationalized Domain Names for Applications
(IDNA) addresses in the SnmpTLSAddress textual
convention (TC)."
REVISION "201005070000Z"
DESCRIPTION
"This version of this MIB module is part of
RFC 5953; see the RFC itself for full legal
notices."
::= { mib-2 198 }
-- ************************************************
-- subtrees of the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB
-- ************************************************
snmpTlstmNotifications OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 0 }
snmpTlstmIdentities OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 1 }
snmpTlstmObjects OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 2 }
snmpTlstmConformance OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmMIB 3 }
snmpTlstmHashAlgorithms OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A node used to register hashing algorithm identifiers
recorded in the IANA 'SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms' registry."
::= { snmpTlstmMIB 4 }
-- ************************************************
-- snmpTlstmObjects - Objects
-- ************************************************
snmpTLSTCPDomain OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The OBJECT IDENTIFIER representing the TDomain for the
SNMP over TLS via TCP transport domain. The
corresponding transport address is of type SnmpTLSAddress.
The securityName prefix to be associated with the
snmpTLSTCPDomain is 'tls'. This prefix MAY be used by
security models or other components to identify which secure
transport infrastructure authenticated a securityName."
REFERENCE
"TDomain, as defined in RFC 2579: Textual Conventions
for SMIv2"
::= { snmpDomains 8 }
snmpDTLSUDPDomain OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The OBJECT IDENTIFIER representing the TDomain for the
SNMP over DTLS via UDP transport domain. The
corresponding transport address is of type SnmpTLSAddress.
The securityName prefix to be associated with the
snmpDTLSUDPDomain is 'dtls'. This prefix MAY be used by
security models or other components to identify which secure
transport infrastructure authenticated a securityName."
REFERENCE
"TDomain, as defined in RFC 2579: Textual Conventions
for SMIv2"
::= { snmpDomains 9 }
SnmpTLSAddress ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
DISPLAY-HINT "1a"
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Represents an IPv4 address, an IPv6 address, or an
ASCII-encoded host name and port number.
An IPv4 address MUST be in dotted decimal format followed
by a colon ':' (ASCII character 0x3A) and a decimal
port number in ASCII.
An IPv6 address MUST be a colon-separated format (as
described in RFC 5952), surrounded by square brackets
('[', ASCII character 0x5B, and ']', ASCII character
0x5D), followed by a colon ':' (ASCII character 0x3A)
and a decimal port number in ASCII.
A host name MUST be in ASCII (as per RFC 1123);
internationalized host names MUST be encoded as A-labels as
specified in RFC 5890. The host name is followed by a
colon ':' (ASCII character 0x3A) and a decimal port
number in ASCII. The name SHOULD be fully qualified
whenever possible.
Values of this textual convention are not guaranteed to be
directly usable as transport-layer addressing information,
potentially requiring additional processing, such as
run-time resolution. As such, applications that write
them MUST be prepared for handling errors if such values
are not supported or cannot be resolved (if resolution
occurs at the time of the management operation).
The DESCRIPTION clause of TransportAddress objects that
may have SnmpTLSAddress values MUST fully describe how
(and when) such names are to be resolved to IP addresses
and vice versa.
This textual convention SHOULD NOT be used directly in
object definitions, since it restricts addresses to a
specific format. However, if it is used, it MAY be used
either on its own or in conjunction with
TransportAddressType or TransportDomain as a pair.
When this textual convention is used as a syntax of an
index object, there may be issues with the limit of 128
sub-identifiers specified in SMIv2 (STD 58). It is
RECOMMENDED that all MIB documents using this textual
convention make explicit any limitations on index
component lengths that management software MUST observe.
This MAY be done by either 1) including SIZE constraints
on the index components or 2) specifying applicable
constraints in the conceptual row's DESCRIPTION clause or
in the surrounding documentation."
REFERENCE
"RFC 1123: Requirements for Internet Hosts - Application and
Support
RFC 5890: Internationalized Domain Names for Applications
(IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework
RFC 5952: A Recommendation for IPv6 Address Text
Representation"
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (1..255))
SnmpTLSFingerprint ::= TEXTUAL-CONVENTION
DISPLAY-HINT "1x:1x"
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A fingerprint value that can be used to uniquely reference
other data of potentially arbitrary length.
An SnmpTLSFingerprint value is composed of a one-octet
hashing algorithm identifier followed by the fingerprint
value. The one-octet identifier value encoded is taken
from the IANA 'SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms' registry. The
remaining octets of the SnmpTLSFingerprint value are
filled using the results of the hashing algorithm.
Historically, the one-octet hashing algorithm identifier
was based on the IANA 'TLS HashAlgorithm' registry
(RFC 5246); however, this registry is no longer in use for
TLS 1.3 and above and is not expected to have any new
registrations added to it. To allow the fingerprint
algorithm to support additional hashing algorithms that
might be used by later versions of (D)TLS, the octet value
encoded is now taken from the IANA
'SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms' registry. The initial values
within this registry are identical to the values in the
'TLS HashAlgorithm' registry but can be extended to
support new hashing algorithms as needed.
This textual convention allows for a zero-length (blank)
SnmpTLSFingerprint value for use in tables where the
fingerprint value MAY be optional. MIB definitions or
implementations MAY refuse to accept a zero-length value
as appropriate."
REFERENCE
"RFC 5246: The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.2
https://www.iana.org/assignments/smi-numbers/"
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..255))
-- Identities for use in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ snmpTlstmIdentities 1 }
snmpTlstmCertSpecified OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Directly specifies the tmSecurityName to be used for this
certificate. The value of the tmSecurityName to use is
specified in the 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNData' column. The
'snmpTlstmCertToTSNData' column MUST contain a
non-zero-length SnmpAdminString-compliant value, or the
mapping described in this row MUST be considered a
failure."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 1 }
snmpTlstmCertSANRFC822Name OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Maps a subjectAltName's rfc822Name to a tmSecurityName.
The local-part of the rfc822Name is passed unaltered, but
the domain of the name MUST be passed in lowercase.
This mapping results in a 1:1 correspondence between
equivalent subjectAltName rfc822Name values and
tmSecurityName values, except that the domain of the
name MUST be passed in lowercase.
Example rfc822Name field: FooBar@Example.COM is mapped to
tmSecurityName: FooBar@example.com."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 2 }
snmpTlstmCertSANDNSName OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Maps a subjectAltName's dNSName to a tmSecurityName after
first converting it to all lowercase (RFC 5280 does not
specify converting to lowercase, so this involves an extra
step). This mapping results in a 1:1 correspondence
between subjectAltName dNSName values and the
tmSecurityName values."
REFERENCE
"RFC 5280: Internet X.509 Public Key Infrastructure
Certificate and Certificate Revocation
List (CRL) Profile"
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 3 }
snmpTlstmCertSANIpAddress OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Maps a subjectAltName's iPAddress to a tmSecurityName by
transforming the binary-encoded address as follows:
1) For IPv4, the value is converted into a
decimal-dotted quad address (e.g., '192.0.2.1').
2) For IPv6 addresses, the value is converted into a
32-character all-lowercase hexadecimal string
without any colon separators.
This mapping results in a 1:1 correspondence between
subjectAltName iPAddress values and the tmSecurityName
values.
The resulting length of an encoded IPv6 address is the
maximum length supported by the View-based Access Control
Model (VACM). Using an IPv6 address while the value of
snmpTsmConfigurationUsePrefix is 'true' (see the
SNMP-TSM-MIB, as defined in RFC 5591) will result in
securityName lengths that exceed what the VACM can handle."
REFERENCE
"RFC 5591: Transport Security Model for the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMP)"
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 4 }
snmpTlstmCertSANAny OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Maps any of the following fields using the corresponding
mapping algorithms:
|------------+----------------------------|
| Type | Algorithm |
|------------+----------------------------|
| rfc822Name | snmpTlstmCertSANRFC822Name |
| dNSName | snmpTlstmCertSANDNSName |
| iPAddress | snmpTlstmCertSANIpAddress |
|------------+----------------------------|
The first subjectAltName value contained in the certificate
that matches any of the above types MUST be used when
deriving the tmSecurityName. The mapping algorithm
specified in the 'Algorithm' column of the corresponding
row MUST be used to derive the tmSecurityName.
This mapping results in a 1:1 correspondence between
subjectAltName values and tmSecurityName values. The
three sub-mapping algorithms produced by this combined
algorithm cannot produce conflicting results between
themselves."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 5 }
snmpTlstmCertCommonName OBJECT-IDENTITY
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Maps a certificate's CommonName to a tmSecurityName after
converting it to a UTF-8 encoding. The usage of
CommonNames is deprecated, and users are encouraged to use
subjectAltName mapping methods instead. This mapping
results in a 1:1 correspondence between certificate
CommonName values and tmSecurityName values."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities 6 }
-- The snmpTlstmSession Group
snmpTlstmSession OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmObjects 1 }
snmpTlstmSessionOpens OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of times an openSession() request has been
executed as a (D)TLS client, regardless of whether it
succeeded or failed."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 1 }
snmpTlstmSessionClientCloses OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of times a closeSession() request has been
executed as a (D)TLS client, regardless of whether it
succeeded or failed."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 2 }
snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of times an openSession() request failed to
open a session as a (D)TLS client, for any reason."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 3 }
snmpTlstmSessionAccepts OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of times a (D)TLS server has accepted a new
connection from a client and has received at least one
SNMP message through it."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 4 }
snmpTlstmSessionServerCloses OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of times a closeSession() request has been
executed as a (D)TLS server, regardless of whether it
succeeded or failed."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 5 }
snmpTlstmSessionNoSessions OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of times an outgoing message was dropped
because the session associated with the passed
tmStateReference was no longer (or never) available."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 6 }
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidClientCertificates OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of times an incoming session was not
established on a (D)TLS server because the presented
client certificate was invalid. Reasons for invalidation
include, but are not limited to, cryptographic validation
failures or lack of a suitable mapping row in the
snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 7 }
snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of times an outgoing session was not
established on a (D)TLS client because the server
certificate presented by an SNMP over (D)TLS server was
invalid because no configured fingerprint or Certification
Authority (CA) was acceptable to validate it. This may
result because there was no entry in the
snmpTlstmAddrTable or because no path to a known CA could
be found."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 8 }
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of times an outgoing session was not
established on a (D)TLS client because the server
certificate presented by an SNMP over (D)TLS server could
not be validated even if the fingerprint or expected
validation path was known. That is, a cryptographic
validation error occurred during certificate validation
processing.
Reasons for invalidation include, but are not limited to,
cryptographic validation failures."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 9 }
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidCaches OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Counter32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The number of outgoing messages dropped because the
tmStateReference referred to an invalid cache."
::= { snmpTlstmSession 10 }
-- Configuration Objects
snmpTlstmConfig OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmObjects 2 }
-- Certificate mapping
snmpTlstmCertificateMapping OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::=
{ snmpTlstmConfig 1 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNCount OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A count of the number of entries in the
snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 1 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNTableLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TimeStamp
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The value of sysUpTime.0 when the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable
was last modified through any means, or 0 if it has not
been modified since the command responder was started."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 2 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This table is used by a (D)TLS server to map the (D)TLS
client's presented X.509 certificate to a tmSecurityName.
On an incoming (D)TLS/SNMP connection, the client's
presented certificate either MUST be validated based on an
established trust anchor or MUST directly match a
fingerprint in this table. This table does not provide
any mechanisms for configuring the trust anchors; the
transfer of any needed trusted certificates for path
validation is expected to occur through an out-of-band
transfer.
Once the certificate has been found acceptable (either via
path validation or by directly matching a fingerprint in
this table), this table is consulted to determine the
appropriate tmSecurityName to identify with the remote
connection. This is done by considering each active row
from this table in prioritized order according to its
snmpTlstmCertToTSNID value. Each row's
snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value determines whether the
row is a match for the incoming connection:
1) If the row's snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value
identifies the presented certificate, then consider
the row as a successful match.
2) If the row's snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint value
identifies a locally held copy of a trusted CA
certificate and that CA certificate was used to
validate the path to the presented certificate, then
consider the row as a successful match.
Once a matching row has been found, the
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType value can be used to determine
how the tmSecurityName to associate with the session
should be determined. See the 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType'
column's DESCRIPTION clause for details on determining the
tmSecurityName value. If it is impossible to determine a
tmSecurityName from the row's data combined with the data
presented in the certificate, then additional rows MUST be
searched to look for another potential match. If a
resulting tmSecurityName mapped from a given row is not
compatible with the needed requirements of a
tmSecurityName (e.g., the VACM imposes a 32-octet-maximum
length and the certificate-derived securityName could be
longer), then it MUST be considered an invalid match and
additional rows MUST be searched to look for another
potential match.
If no matching and valid row can be found, the connection
MUST be closed and SNMP messages MUST NOT be accepted over
it.
Missing values of snmpTlstmCertToTSNID are acceptable, and
implementations SHOULD continue to the
next-highest-numbered row. It is RECOMMENDED that
administrators skip index values to leave room for the
insertion of future rows (for example, use values of 10
and 20 when creating initial rows).
Users are encouraged to make use of certificates with
subjectAltName fields that can be used as tmSecurityNames.
This allows all child certificates of a single root CA
certificate to include a subjectAltName that maps directly
to a tmSecurityName via a 1:1 transformation. However,
this table is flexible, to allow for situations where
existing deployed certificate infrastructures do not provide
adequate subjectAltName values for use as tmSecurityNames.
Certificates MAY also be mapped to tmSecurityNames using
the CommonName portion of the Subject field. However, the
usage of the CommonName field is deprecated, and thus this
usage is NOT RECOMMENDED. Direct mapping from each
individual certificate fingerprint to a tmSecurityName is
also possible but requires one entry in the table per
tmSecurityName and requires more management operations to
completely configure a device."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 3 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A row in the snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable that specifies a
mapping for an incoming (D)TLS certificate to a
tmSecurityName to use for a connection."
INDEX { snmpTlstmCertToTSNID }
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNTable 1 }
SnmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
snmpTlstmCertToTSNID Unsigned32,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint SnmpTLSFingerprint,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType AutonomousType,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNData OCTET STRING,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType StorageType,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus RowStatus
}
snmpTlstmCertToTSNID OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Unsigned32 (1..4294967295)
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A unique, prioritized index for the given entry. Lower
numbers indicate a higher priority."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 1 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpTLSFingerprint (SIZE (1..255))
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A cryptographic hash of an X.509 certificate. The results
of a successful matching fingerprint to either the trusted
CA in the certificate validation path or the certificate
itself is dictated by the 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType'
column."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 2 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX AutonomousType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Specifies the mapping type for deriving a tmSecurityName
from a certificate. Details for mapping of a particular
type SHALL be specified in the DESCRIPTION clause of the
OBJECT-IDENTITY that describes the mapping. If a mapping
succeeds, it will return a tmSecurityName for use by the
TLSTM and processing will stop.
If the resulting mapped value is not compatible with the
needed requirements of a tmSecurityName (e.g., the VACM
imposes a 32-octet-maximum length and the
certificate-derived securityName could be longer), then
future rows MUST be searched for additional
snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint matches to look for a
mapping that succeeds.
Suitable values for assigning to this object that are
defined within the SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB can be found in the
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMIdentities portion of the MIB tree."
DEFVAL { snmpTlstmCertSpecified }
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 3 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNData OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX OCTET STRING (SIZE (0..1024))
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Auxiliary data used as optional configuration information
for a given mapping specified by the
'snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType' column. Only some mapping
systems will make use of this column. The value in this
column MUST be ignored for any mapping type that does not
require that data be present in this column."
DEFVAL { "" }
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 4 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The storage type for this conceptual row. Conceptual rows
having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access
to any columnar objects in the row."
DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 5 }
snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The status of this conceptual row. This object MAY be
used to create or remove rows from this table.
To create a row in this table, an administrator MUST set
this object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).
Until instances of all corresponding columns are
appropriately configured, the value of the corresponding
instance of the 'snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus' column is
notReady(3).
In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active
until the corresponding 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint',
'snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType', and 'snmpTlstmCertToTSNData'
columns have been set.
The following objects MUST NOT be modified while the
value of this object is active(1):
- snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint
- snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType
- snmpTlstmCertToTSNData
An attempt to set these objects while the value of
snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus is active(1) will result in
an inconsistentValue error."
::= { snmpTlstmCertToTSNEntry 6 }
-- Maps tmSecurityNames to certificates for use by the
-- SNMP-TARGET-MIB
snmpTlstmParamsCount OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A count of the number of entries in the
snmpTlstmParamsTable."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 4 }
snmpTlstmParamsTableLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TimeStamp
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The value of sysUpTime.0 when the snmpTlstmParamsTable
was last modified through any means, or 0 if it has not
been modified since the command responder was started."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 5 }
snmpTlstmParamsTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpTlstmParamsEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This table is used by a (D)TLS client when a (D)TLS
connection is being set up using an entry in the
SNMP-TARGET-MIB. It extends the SNMP-TARGET-MIB's
snmpTargetParamsTable with a fingerprint of a certificate
to use when establishing such a (D)TLS connection."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 6 }
snmpTlstmParamsEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpTlstmParamsEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A conceptual row containing a fingerprint hash of a
locally held certificate for a given
snmpTargetParamsEntry. The values in this row SHOULD be
ignored if the connection that needs to be established, as
indicated by the SNMP-TARGET-MIB infrastructure, is not a
certificate-based and (D)TLS-based connection. The
connection SHOULD NOT be established if the certificate
fingerprint stored in this entry does not point to a valid
locally held certificate or if it points to an unusable
certificate (such as might happen when the certificate's
expiration date has been reached)."
INDEX { IMPLIED snmpTargetParamsName }
::= { snmpTlstmParamsTable 1 }
SnmpTlstmParamsEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint SnmpTLSFingerprint,
snmpTlstmParamsStorageType StorageType,
snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus RowStatus
}
snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpTLSFingerprint
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This object stores the hash of the public portion of a
locally held X.509 certificate. The X.509 certificate,
its public key, and the corresponding private key will be
used when initiating a (D)TLS connection as a (D)TLS
client."
::= { snmpTlstmParamsEntry 1 }
snmpTlstmParamsStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The storage type for this conceptual row. Conceptual rows
having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access
to any columnar objects in the row."
DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { snmpTlstmParamsEntry 2 }
snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The status of this conceptual row. This object MAY be
used to create or remove rows from this table.
To create a row in this table, an administrator MUST set
this object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).
Until instances of all corresponding columns are
appropriately configured, the value of the corresponding
instance of the 'snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus' column is
notReady(3).
In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active
until the corresponding 'snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint'
column has been set.
The snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint object MUST NOT be
modified while the value of this object is active(1).
An attempt to set these objects while the value of
snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus is active(1) will result in
an inconsistentValue error."
::= { snmpTlstmParamsEntry 3 }
snmpTlstmAddrCount OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX Gauge32
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A count of the number of entries in the
snmpTlstmAddrTable."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 7 }
snmpTlstmAddrTableLastChanged OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX TimeStamp
MAX-ACCESS read-only
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The value of sysUpTime.0 when the snmpTlstmAddrTable
was last modified through any means, or 0 if it has not
been modified since the command responder was started."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 8 }
snmpTlstmAddrTable OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SEQUENCE OF SnmpTlstmAddrEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"This table is used by a (D)TLS client when a (D)TLS
connection is being set up using an entry in the
SNMP-TARGET-MIB. It extends the SNMP-TARGET-MIB's
snmpTargetAddrTable so that the client can verify that the
correct server has been reached. This verification can
use either 1) a certificate fingerprint or 2) an
identity authenticated via certification path validation.
If there is an active row in this table corresponding to
the entry in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB that was used to
establish the connection and the row's
'snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint' column has a non-empty
value, then the server's presented certificate is compared
with the snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint value (and the
'snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity' column is ignored). If the
fingerprint matches, the verification has succeeded. If
the fingerprint does not match, then the connection MUST
be closed.
If the server's presented certificate has passed
certification path validation (RFC 5280) to a configured
trust anchor and an active row exists with a zero-length
snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint value, then the
'snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity' column contains the expected
host name. This expected host name is then compared
against the server's certificate as follows:
- Implementations MUST support matching the expected
host name against a dNSName in the subjectAltName
extension field and MAY support checking the name
against the CommonName portion of the subject
distinguished name.
- The '*' (ASCII 0x2A) wildcard character is allowed in
the dNSName of the subjectAltName extension (and in
CommonName, if used to store the host name), but
only as the leftmost (least significant) DNS label
in that value. This wildcard matches any leftmost
DNS label in the server name. That is, the subject
*.example.com matches the server names a.example.com
and b.example.com but does not match example.com or
a.b.example.com. Implementations MUST support
wildcards in certificates as specified above but MAY
provide a configuration option to disable them.
- If the locally configured name is an
internationalized domain name, conforming
implementations MUST convert it to the ASCII
Compatible Encoding (ACE) format for performing
comparisons, as specified in Section 7 of RFC 5280.
If the expected host name fails these conditions, then the
connection MUST be closed.
If there is no row in this table corresponding to the
entry in the SNMP-TARGET-MIB and the server can be
authorized by another, implementation-dependent means,
then the connection MAY still proceed."
::= { snmpTlstmCertificateMapping 9 }
snmpTlstmAddrEntry OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpTlstmAddrEntry
MAX-ACCESS not-accessible
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A conceptual row containing a copy of a certificate's
fingerprint for a given snmpTargetAddrEntry. The values
in this row SHOULD be ignored if the connection that needs
to be established, as indicated by the SNMP-TARGET-MIB
infrastructure, is not a (D)TLS-based connection. If an
snmpTlstmAddrEntry exists for a given snmpTargetAddrEntry,
then the presented server certificate MUST match or the
connection MUST NOT be established. If a row in this
table does not exist to match an snmpTargetAddrEntry row,
then the connection SHOULD still proceed if some other
certification path validation algorithm (e.g., RFC 5280)
can be used."
INDEX { IMPLIED snmpTargetAddrName }
::= { snmpTlstmAddrTable 1 }
SnmpTlstmAddrEntry ::= SEQUENCE {
snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint SnmpTLSFingerprint,
snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity SnmpAdminString,
snmpTlstmAddrStorageType StorageType,
snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus RowStatus
}
snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpTLSFingerprint
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A cryptographic hash of a public X.509 certificate. This
object should store the hash of the public X.509
certificate that the remote server should present during
the (D)TLS connection setup. The fingerprint of the
presented certificate and this hash value MUST match
exactly, or the connection MUST NOT be established."
DEFVAL { "" }
::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 1 }
snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX SnmpAdminString
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The reference identity to check against the identity
presented by the remote system."
DEFVAL { "" }
::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 2 }
snmpTlstmAddrStorageType OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX StorageType
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The storage type for this conceptual row. Conceptual rows
having the value 'permanent' need not allow write-access
to any columnar objects in the row."
DEFVAL { nonVolatile }
::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 3 }
snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus OBJECT-TYPE
SYNTAX RowStatus
MAX-ACCESS read-create
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The status of this conceptual row. This object may be
used to create or remove rows from this table.
To create a row in this table, an administrator MUST set
this object to either createAndGo(4) or createAndWait(5).
Until instances of all corresponding columns are
appropriately configured, the value of the corresponding
instance of the 'snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus' column is
notReady(3).
In particular, a newly created row cannot be made active
until the corresponding 'snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint'
column has been set.
Rows MUST NOT be active if the
'snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint' column is blank and the
snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity is set to '*', since this
would insecurely accept any presented certificate.
The snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint object MUST NOT be
modified while the value of this object is active(1).
An attempt to set these objects while the value of
snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus is active(1) will result in
an inconsistentValue error."
::= { snmpTlstmAddrEntry 4 }
-- ************************************************
-- snmpTlstmNotifications - Notifications Information
-- ************************************************
snmpTlstmServerCertificateUnknown NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS { snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate }
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Notification that the server certificate presented by an
SNMP over (D)TLS server was invalid because no configured
fingerprint or CA was acceptable to validate it. This may
be because there was no entry in the snmpTlstmAddrTable or
because no path to a known CA could be found.
To avoid notification loops, this notification MUST NOT be
sent to servers that themselves have triggered the
notification."
::= { snmpTlstmNotifications 1 }
snmpTlstmServerInvalidCertificate NOTIFICATION-TYPE
OBJECTS {
snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint,
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Notification that the server certificate presented by an
SNMP over (D)TLS server could not be validated even if the
fingerprint or expected validation path was known.
That is, a cryptographic validation error occurred during
certificate validation processing.
To avoid notification loops, this notification MUST NOT be
sent to servers that themselves have triggered the
notification."
::= { snmpTlstmNotifications 2 }
-- ************************************************
-- snmpTlstmCompliances - Conformance Information
-- ************************************************
snmpTlstmCompliances OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmConformance 1 }
snmpTlstmGroups OBJECT IDENTIFIER ::= { snmpTlstmConformance 2 }
-- ************************************************
-- Compliance statements
-- ************************************************
snmpTlstmCompliance MODULE-COMPLIANCE
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"The compliance statement for SNMP engines that support the
SNMP-TLS-TM-MIB."
MODULE
MANDATORY-GROUPS { snmpTlstmStatsGroup,
snmpTlstmIncomingGroup,
snmpTlstmOutgoingGroup,
snmpTlstmNotificationGroup }
::= { snmpTlstmCompliances 1 }
-- ************************************************
-- Units of conformance
-- ************************************************
snmpTlstmStatsGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
snmpTlstmSessionOpens,
snmpTlstmSessionClientCloses,
snmpTlstmSessionOpenErrors,
snmpTlstmSessionAccepts,
snmpTlstmSessionServerCloses,
snmpTlstmSessionNoSessions,
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidClientCertificates,
snmpTlstmSessionUnknownServerCertificate,
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidServerCertificates,
snmpTlstmSessionInvalidCaches
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A collection of objects for maintaining statistical
information of an SNMP engine that implements the SNMP
TLSTM."
::= { snmpTlstmGroups 1 }
snmpTlstmIncomingGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
snmpTlstmCertToTSNCount,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNTableLastChanged,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNFingerprint,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNMapType,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNData,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNStorageType,
snmpTlstmCertToTSNRowStatus
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A collection of objects for maintaining incoming
connection certificate mappings to tmSecurityNames of an
SNMP engine that implements the SNMP TLSTM."
::= { snmpTlstmGroups 2 }
snmpTlstmOutgoingGroup OBJECT-GROUP
OBJECTS {
snmpTlstmParamsCount,
snmpTlstmParamsTableLastChanged,
snmpTlstmParamsClientFingerprint,
snmpTlstmParamsStorageType,
snmpTlstmParamsRowStatus,
snmpTlstmAddrCount,
snmpTlstmAddrTableLastChanged,
snmpTlstmAddrServerFingerprint,
snmpTlstmAddrServerIdentity,
snmpTlstmAddrStorageType,
snmpTlstmAddrRowStatus
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"A collection of objects for maintaining outgoing
connection certificates to use when opening connections as
a result of SNMP-TARGET-MIB settings."
::= { snmpTlstmGroups 3 }
snmpTlstmNotificationGroup NOTIFICATION-GROUP
NOTIFICATIONS {
snmpTlstmServerCertificateUnknown,
snmpTlstmServerInvalidCertificate
}
STATUS current
DESCRIPTION
"Notifications."
::= { snmpTlstmGroups 4 }
END
<CODE ENDS>
5. Security Considerations
This document updates a transport model that permits SNMP to utilize
(D)TLS security services. The security threats and how the TLSTM
mitigates these threats are covered throughout this document and in
[RFC6353]. Security considerations for TLS are described in
Section 10 and Appendix E of TLS 1.3 [RFC8446]. Security
considerations for DTLS are described in Section 11 of DTLS 1.3
[RFC9147].
Implementations should consider the latest recommendations on the use
of (DTLS), such as those documented in [RFC9325].
SNMP versions prior to SNMPv3 did not include adequate security.
Even if the network itself is secure (for example, by using IPsec),
there is no control as to who on the secure network is allowed to
access and GET/SET (read/change/create/delete) the objects in this
MIB module.
It is RECOMMENDED that only SNMPv3 messages using the Transport
Security Model (TSM) or another secure-transport-aware security model
be sent over the TLSTM transport.
6. IANA Considerations
IANA has created a new registry called "SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms"
within the "Structure of Management Information (SMI) Numbers (MIB
Module Registrations)" group. The description of this registry is
"iso.org.dod.internet.mgmt.mib-2.snmpTlstmMIB.snmpTlstmHashAlgorithms
(1.3.6.1.2.1.198.4)".
The registry has the following fields: Value, Description,
Recommended, and References. The range of values is zero to 255,
with initial assignments shown in Section 2.1. The "Recommended"
column indicates "Y" for hashing algorithms that are Standards Track
and are deemed to be acceptable for widely applicable current use and
"N" for hashing algorithms that reflect meanings that are not
recommended (e.g., they do not provide sufficient security for modern
systems, they are not Standards Track, and they have limited
applicability). A blank field indicates that no recommendation is
made (e.g., because the value is unassigned or left for private use).
This registry is expected to be updated infrequently; as such, its
values are limited to one octet.
The policy for updates to the "SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms" registry is
Expert Review [RFC8126]. Registry requests should be sent to the
<mailto:snmp-tlstm-reg-review@ietf.org> mailing list. Registration
requests sent to the mailing list for review SHOULD use an
appropriate subject (e.g., 'Request to register value in "SNMP-TLSTM
HashAlgorithms" registry'). In addition, designated experts should
consult with the <mailto:tls-reg-review@ietf.org> mailing list to
make sure that any new hash algorithms are considered for inclusion
in this registry.
Designated experts SHOULD ascertain the existence of suitable
documentation that defines a hash algorithm and SHOULD also verify
that the request does not conflict with or duplicate other entries in
the registry. The experts should also provide a recommendation as to
how the "Recommended" column of the registry should be updated. Only
publicly available specifications that represent current industry-
accepted practices should receive an assignment of "Y" in the
"Recommended" column; all other specific assignments in the registry
should receive an assignment of "N". Assignments that are
nonspecific (e.g., reserved values) SHOULD NOT receive an assigned
value for the "Recommended" column.
Within the three-week review period, the designated experts will
either approve or deny the registration request, communicating this
decision to the review list and IANA. Denials SHOULD include an
explanation and, if applicable, suggestions as to how to make the
request successful. Registration requests that are undetermined for
a period longer than three weeks can be brought to the IESG's
attention (using the <mailto:iesg@ietf.org> mailing list) for
resolution.
IANA MUST only accept registry updates from the designated experts
and SHOULD direct all requests for registration to the review mailing
list. While future additions to the "TLS HashAlgorithm" registry
(i.e., the registry from which the "SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms"
registry was spawned) are not expected, any future additions to the
"TLS HashAlgorithm" registry MUST be consistent with the values
assigned in the "SNMP-TLSTM HashAlgorithms" registry.
It is suggested that multiple designated experts be appointed who are
able to represent the perspectives of different applications using
this specification, in order to enable broadly informed reviews of
registration decisions. In cases where a registration decision could
be perceived as creating a conflict of interest for a particular
expert, that expert SHOULD defer to the judgment of the other
experts.
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[RFC1123] Braden, R., Ed., "Requirements for Internet Hosts -
Application and Support", STD 3, RFC 1123,
DOI 10.17487/RFC1123, October 1989,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc1123>.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119,
DOI 10.17487/RFC2119, March 1997,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc2119>.
[RFC3410] Case, J., Mundy, R., Partain, D., and B. Stewart,
"Introduction and Applicability Statements for Internet-
Standard Management Framework", RFC 3410,
DOI 10.17487/RFC3410, December 2002,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc3410>.
[RFC5280] Cooper, D., Santesson, S., Farrell, S., Boeyen, S.,
Housley, R., and W. Polk, "Internet X.509 Public Key
Infrastructure Certificate and Certificate Revocation List
(CRL) Profile", RFC 5280, DOI 10.17487/RFC5280, May 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5280>.
[RFC5890] Klensin, J., "Internationalized Domain Names for
Applications (IDNA): Definitions and Document Framework",
RFC 5890, DOI 10.17487/RFC5890, August 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5890>.
[RFC5952] Kawamura, S. and M. Kawashima, "A Recommendation for IPv6
Address Text Representation", RFC 5952,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5952, August 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5952>.
[RFC6353] Hardaker, W., "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport
Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",
STD 78, RFC 6353, DOI 10.17487/RFC6353, July 2011,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc6353>.
[RFC8174] Leiba, B., "Ambiguity of Uppercase vs Lowercase in RFC
2119 Key Words", BCP 14, RFC 8174, DOI 10.17487/RFC8174,
May 2017, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8174>.
[RFC8446] Rescorla, E., "The Transport Layer Security (TLS) Protocol
Version 1.3", RFC 8446, DOI 10.17487/RFC8446, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8446>.
[STD58] McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Structure of Management Information
Version 2 (SMIv2)", STD 58, RFC 2578, April 1999.
McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Textual Conventions for SMIv2",
STD 58, RFC 2579, April 1999.
McCloghrie, K., Ed., Perkins, D., Ed., and J.
Schoenwaelder, Ed., "Conformance Statements for SMIv2",
STD 58, RFC 2580, April 1999.
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/std58>
[STD62] Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen, "An
Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks", STD 62, RFC 3411,
December 2002.
Case, J., Harrington, D., Presuhn, R., and B. Wijnen,
"Message Processing and Dispatching for the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3412, December
2002.
Levi, D., Meyer, P., and B. Stewart, "Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMP) Applications", STD 62,
RFC 3413, December 2002.
Blumenthal, U. and B. Wijnen, "User-based Security Model
(USM) for version 3 of the Simple Network Management
Protocol (SNMPv3)", STD 62, RFC 3414, December 2002.
Wijnen, B., Presuhn, R., and K. McCloghrie, "View-based
Access Control Model (VACM) for the Simple Network
Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3415, December
2002.
Presuhn, R., Ed., "Version 2 of the Protocol Operations
for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",
STD 62, RFC 3416, December 2002.
Presuhn, R., Ed., "Transport Mappings for the Simple
Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62, RFC 3417,
December 2002.
Presuhn, R., Ed., "Management Information Base (MIB) for
the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)", STD 62,
RFC 3418, December 2002.
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/std62>
7.2. Informative References
[RFC5246] Dierks, T. and E. Rescorla, "The Transport Layer Security
(TLS) Protocol Version 1.2", RFC 5246,
DOI 10.17487/RFC5246, August 2008,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5246>.
[RFC5591] Harrington, D. and W. Hardaker, "Transport Security Model
for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",
STD 78, RFC 5591, DOI 10.17487/RFC5591, June 2009,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5591>.
[RFC5953] Hardaker, W., "Transport Layer Security (TLS) Transport
Model for the Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP)",
RFC 5953, DOI 10.17487/RFC5953, August 2010,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc5953>.
[RFC8126] Cotton, M., Leiba, B., and T. Narten, "Guidelines for
Writing an IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26,
RFC 8126, DOI 10.17487/RFC8126, June 2017,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8126>.
[RFC8422] Nir, Y., Josefsson, S., and M. Pegourie-Gonnard, "Elliptic
Curve Cryptography (ECC) Cipher Suites for Transport Layer
Security (TLS) Versions 1.2 and Earlier", RFC 8422,
DOI 10.17487/RFC8422, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8422>.
[RFC8447] Salowey, J. and S. Turner, "IANA Registry Updates for TLS
and DTLS", RFC 8447, DOI 10.17487/RFC8447, August 2018,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8447>.
[RFC8996] Moriarty, K. and S. Farrell, "Deprecating TLS 1.0 and TLS
1.1", BCP 195, RFC 8996, DOI 10.17487/RFC8996, March 2021,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc8996>.
[RFC9147] Rescorla, E., Tschofenig, H., and N. Modadugu, "The
Datagram Transport Layer Security (DTLS) Protocol Version
1.3", RFC 9147, DOI 10.17487/RFC9147, April 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9147>.
[RFC9150] Cam-Winget, N. and J. Visoky, "TLS 1.3 Authentication and
Integrity-Only Cipher Suites", RFC 9150,
DOI 10.17487/RFC9150, April 2022,
<https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9150>.
[RFC9325] Sheffer, Y., Saint-Andre, P., and T. Fossati,
"Recommendations for Secure Use of Transport Layer
Security (TLS) and Datagram Transport Layer Security
(DTLS)", BCP 195, RFC 9325, DOI 10.17487/RFC9325, November
2022, <https://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc9325>.
Acknowledgements
This document is based on [RFC6353]. This document was reviewed by
the following people, who helped provide useful comments: Michaela
Vanderveen, Joe Clarke, Jürgen Schönwälder, and Tom Petch.
Author's Address
Kenneth Vaughn (editor)
Trevilon LLC
1060 Highway 107 South
Del Rio, TN 37727
United States of America
Phone: +1 571 331 5670
Email: kvaughn@trevilon.com