💾 Archived View for gemini.bortzmeyer.org › rfc-mirror › rfc4345.txt captured on 2024-05-26 at 16:57:32.
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Network Working Group B. Harris
Request for Comments: 4345 January 2006
Category: Standards Track
Improved Arcfour Modes for
the Secure Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Protocol
Status of This Memo
This document specifies an Internet standards track protocol for the
Internet community, and requests discussion and suggestions for
improvements. Please refer to the current edition of the "Internet
Official Protocol Standards" (STD 1) for the standardization state
and status of this protocol. Distribution of this memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
Abstract
This document specifies methods of using the Arcfour cipher in the
Secure Shell (SSH) protocol that mitigate the weakness of the
cipher's key-scheduling algorithm.
1. Introduction
Secure Shell (SSH) [RFC4251] is a secure remote-login protocol. It
allows for the use of an extensible variety of symmetric cipher
algorithms to provide confidentiality for data in transit. One of
the algorithms specified in the base protocol is "arcfour", which
specifies the use of Arcfour (also known as RC4), a fast stream
cipher. As [RFC4253] says, though, "Arcfour (and RC4) has problems
with weak keys, and should be used with caution." These problems are
described in more detail in [MANTIN01], along with a recommendation
to discard the first 1536 bytes of keystream so as to ensure that the
cipher's internal state is thoroughly mixed. This document specifies
new cipher algorithms for SSH that follow this recommendation.
2. Conventions Used in this Document
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
Harris Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 4345 Improved Arcfour Modes for SSH January 2006
3. Applicability Statement
Implementations of Arcfour are typically slightly faster and much
smaller than those of any other encryption algorithm currently
defined for SSH. This must be balanced, though, against the known
security problems with Arcfour described in Section 5. In most
cases, where speed and code size are not critical issues, the
algorithms specified by [RFC4344] should be used instead.
4. Algorithm Definitions
The "arcfour128" algorithm is the RC4 cipher, as described in
[SCHNEIER], using a 128-bit key. The first 1536 bytes of keystream
generated by the cipher MUST be discarded, and the first byte of the
first encrypted packet MUST be encrypted using the 1537th byte of
keystream.
The "arcfour256" algorithm is the same, but uses a 256-bit key.
5. Security Considerations
The security considerations in [RFC4251] apply.
The discarded bytes of keystream MUST be kept secret and MUST NOT be
transmitted over the network. The contents of these bytes could
reveal information about the key.
There are two classes of attack on Arcfour described in [MIRONOV].
Strong distinguishers distinguish an Arcfour keystream from
randomness at the start of the stream and are defended against by the
algorithm defined in this document. Weak distinguishers can operate
on any part of the keystream, and the best ones, described in [FMcG]
and [MANTIN05], can use data from multiple, different keystreams. A
consequence of this is that encrypting the same data (for instance, a
password) sufficiently many times in separate Arcfour keystreams can
be sufficient to leak information about it to an adversary. It is
thus RECOMMENDED that Arcfour (either in the form described here or
that described in [RFC4251]) not be used for high-volume password-
authenticated connections.
6. IANA Considerations
The IANA has assigned the Encryption Algorithm Names "arcfour128" and
"arcfour256" in accordance with [RFC4250].
Harris Standards Track [Page 2]
RFC 4345 Improved Arcfour Modes for SSH January 2006
7. References
7.1. Normative References
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC4250] Lehtinen, S. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
Protocol Assigned Numbers", RFC 4250, January 2006.
[RFC4251] Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
Protocol Architecture", RFC 4251, January 2006.
[RFC4253] Ylonen, T. and C. Lonvick, Ed., "The Secure Shell (SSH)
Transport Layer Protocol", RFC 4253, January 2006
[RFC4344] Bellare, M., Kohno, T., and C. Namprempre, "The Secure
Shell (SSH) Transport Layer Encryption Modes", RFC 4344,
January 2006.
[SCHNEIER] Schneier, B., "Applied Cryptography Second Edition:
protocols algorithms and source in code in C", John Wiley
and Sons, New York, NY, 1996.
7.2. Informative References
[FMcG] Fluhrer, S. and D. McGrew, "Statistical Analysis of the
Alleged RC4 Keystream Generator", Fast Software
Encryption: 7th International Workshop, FSE 2000, April
2000, <http://www.mindspring.com/~dmcgrew/rc4-03.pdf>.
[MANTIN01] Mantin, I., "Analysis of the Stream Cipher RC4", M.Sc.
Thesis, Weizmann Institute of Science, 2001, <http://
www.wisdom.weizmann.ac.il/~itsik/RC4/Papers/Mantin1.zip>.
[MIRONOV] Mironov, I., "(Not So) Random Shuffles of RC4", Advances
in Cryptology -- CRYPTO 2002: 22nd Annual International
Cryptology Conference, August 2002,
<http://eprint.iacr.org/2002/067.pdf>.
[MANTIN05] Mantin, I., "Predicting and Distinguishing Attacks on RC4
Keystream Generator", Advances in Cryptology -- EUROCRYPT
2005: 24th Annual International Conference on the Theory
and Applications of Cryptographic Techniques, May 2005.
Harris Standards Track [Page 3]
RFC 4345 Improved Arcfour Modes for SSH January 2006
Author's Address
Ben Harris
2a Eachard Road
CAMBRIDGE
CB3 0HY
UNITED KINGDOM
EMail: bjh21@bjh21.me.uk
Trademark Notice
"RC4" and "SSH" are registered trademarks in the United States.
Harris Standards Track [Page 4]
RFC 4345 Improved Arcfour Modes for SSH January 2006
Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (2006).
This document is subject to the rights, licenses and restrictions
contained in BCP 78, and except as set forth therein, the authors
retain all their rights.
This document and the information contained herein are provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE CONTRIBUTOR, THE ORGANIZATION HE/SHE REPRESENTS
OR IS SPONSORED BY (IF ANY), THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET
ENGINEERING TASK FORCE DISCLAIM ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED,
INCLUDING BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE
INFORMATION HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Intellectual Property
The IETF takes no position regarding the validity or scope of any
Intellectual Property Rights or other rights that might be claimed to
pertain to the implementation or use of the technology described in
this document or the extent to which any license under such rights
might or might not be available; nor does it represent that it has
made any independent effort to identify any such rights. Information
on the procedures with respect to rights in RFC documents can be
found in BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Copies of IPR disclosures made to the IETF Secretariat and any
assurances of licenses to be made available, or the result of an
attempt made to obtain a general license or permission for the use of
such proprietary rights by implementers or users of this
specification can be obtained from the IETF on-line IPR repository at
http://www.ietf.org/ipr.
The IETF invites any interested party to bring to its attention any
copyrights, patents or patent applications, or other proprietary
rights that may cover technology that may be required to implement
this standard. Please address the information to the IETF at
ietf-ipr@ietf.org.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is provided by the IETF
Administrative Support Activity (IASA).
Harris Standards Track [Page 5]