💾 Archived View for gemi.dev › gemini-mailing-list › 000426.gmi captured on 2024-05-26 at 15:55:31. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-12-28)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hi folks, I've pushed a few updates to the FAQ today for the first time in quite a while. Nothing which long time list members, or careful archive readers, won't have heard before, but it is stuff that I am frequently asked via direct emails so figured I should finally get around to writing up. The new questions are 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, 2.11 and 2.12. Cheers, Solderpunk
Thanks for doing this. I think it is a particularly strong point that unexpected EOFs are better detected by TLS than by byte-counting. On Sun, Nov 1, 2020 at 10:05 AM Solderpunk <solderpunk at posteo.net> wrote: > Hi folks, > > I've pushed a few updates to the FAQ today for the first time in quite a > while. Nothing which long time list members, or careful archive > readers, won't have heard before, but it is stuff that I am frequently > asked via direct emails so figured I should finally get around to > writing up. The new questions are 2.8, 2.9, 2.10, 2.11 and 2.12. > > Cheers, > Solderpunk > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20201101/53bd 001a/attachment-0001.htm>
Awesome, thanks!
---
Previous Thread: [ANN] Gemini Anonymous Board (and julia server)