πΎ Archived View for gemi.dev βΊ gemini-mailing-list βΊ 000116.gmi captured on 2024-05-26 at 15:18:59. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
β¬ οΈ Previous capture (2023-12-28)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Cool! I just got Castor and mcross installed last night, but neither works with alternate ports (not 1965) which I've had to host my jetforce server on. So im stuck playing with authoring using V-98to view. So if you could make sure gemini://url:port works, I'd love it. On May 19, 2020 8:13:04 AM PDT, gemini-request at lists.orbitalfox.eu wrote: >Send Gemini mailing list submissions to > gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu > >To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit > https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/listinfo/gemini >or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to > gemini-request at lists.orbitalfox.eu > >You can reach the person managing the list at > gemini-owner at lists.orbitalfox.eu > >When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >than "Re: Contents of Gemini digest..." > > >Today's Topics: > > 1. any Gemini to HTTP gateway? (defdefred) > 2. Re: any Gemini to HTTP gateway? (Ben) > 3. Re: [ANN] md2gemini release v1.1.0 and gemini linking > discussion (Jason McBrayer) > 4. Re: vostok: my protocol-agnostic framework, with (very basic) > gemini support (Jason McBrayer) > 5. [ANN] Moonlander: The fanciest Gemini client in the entire > solar system (Ecmel Berk Canl?er) > 6. Extra GUS crawling this morning (Natalie Pendragon) > 7. Re: [ANN] Moonlander: The fanciest Gemini client in the > entire solar system (defdefred) > 8. Re: Announcing garnet, a new (soon-to-be) TUI client (Dunderpate) > 9. Re: Any Windows clients? (Dunderpate) > > >---------------------------------------------------------------------- > >Message: 1 >Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 11:15:55 +0000 >From: defdefred <defdefred at protonmail.com> >To: "A protocol that is slightly more complex than gopher, but > significantly simpler than HTTP" <gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu> >Subject: any Gemini to HTTP gateway? >Message-ID: > <b1fdxvBCvR7WJN45pE8ltkpgp3mt8S68V-_wko8Ccb6jGYmgpeQoXSlazPUO5T2GLVvKsU-S HJ90PDOp0OWzAfXLEyQqHBNf2MnVC2T_DJw=@protonmail.com> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" > >Hey! >Do you know any good gateway to read gemini with a http browser? > >Regards, >freD. >-------------- next part -------------- >An HTML attachment was scrubbed... >URL: ><https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20200519/24a9c739 /attachment-0001.htm> > >------------------------------ > >Message: 2 >Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 16:07:55 +0430 >From: Ben <benulo at systemli.org> >To: defdefred <defdefred at protonmail.com>, A protocol that is slightly > more complex than "gopher," but significantly simpler than HTTP > <gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu> >Subject: Re: any Gemini to HTTP gateway? >Message-ID: <b9aeb3a6-8fba-0176-a104-3275aefc4134 at systemli.org> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed > >I know a couple listed on the Gemini project page: > >https://portal.mozz.us/?url=gemini%3A%2F%2Fgemini.circumlunar.space%2F&fmt=fixed >https://proxy.vulpes.one/gemini/gemini.circumlunar.space > >-- >gemini://kwiecien.us/ > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 3 >Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 07:38:53 -0400 >From: Jason McBrayer <jmcbray at carcosa.net> >To: colecmac at protonmail.com >Cc: "A protocol that is slightly more complex than gopher\, but > significantly simpler than HTTP" <gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu> >Subject: Re: [ANN] md2gemini release v1.1.0 and gemini linking > discussion >Message-ID: <874ksc5f3m.fsf at dorothy.carcosa.net> >Content-Type: text/plain > >colecmac at protonmail.com writes: > >> There was some discussion in another thread about having inline links >> in text/gemini, which solderpunk rejected because it would make >> parsing much more difficult. I agree with him, and so I wonder what >> others on this list think of my take on this. Does using footnotes >make >> sense? Are there better, or just different ways to do solve this >problem? > >As a 'best practice', and not as a specification, I prefer using >footnotes after each paragraph. I'm glad to see your program supports >that option. > >-- >+-----------------------------------------------------------+ >| Jason F. McBrayer jmcbray at carcosa.net | >| If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in | >| battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one | >| is the greatest of all conquerors. --- The Dhammapada | > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 4 >Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 07:45:14 -0400 >From: Jason McBrayer <jmcbray at carcosa.net> >To: solderpunk <solderpunk at SDF.ORG> >Cc: gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu >Subject: Re: vostok: my protocol-agnostic framework, with (very basic) > gemini support >Message-ID: <87zha4408l.fsf at dorothy.carcosa.net> >Content-Type: text/plain > >solderpunk <solderpunk at SDF.ORG> writes: > >> On Tue, May 19, 2020 at 04:42:15AM +0000, Zoey Riordan wrote: >> With the arrival of Vostok alongside the in-development clients Soyuz >> (gemini://gemini.circumlunar.space/users/dominikd/) and Voskhod (JMB, >is >> there a link for Voskhod yet?), we are just about out of names to >borrow >> from the classic era of Soviet manned spaceflight! :) I guess Salyut >is >> left. > >I realize there's not, and the code is only on the ThinkPad whose power >adapter let out the magic smoke, so there won't be until the >replacement >power adapter arrives. It's kind of in limbo for now, because I need to >figure out how Gnome Builder interacts with PyGTK better. > >-- >+-----------------------------------------------------------+ >| Jason F. McBrayer jmcbray at carcosa.net | >| If someone conquers a thousand times a thousand others in | >| battle, and someone else conquers himself, the latter one | >| is the greatest of all conquerors. --- The Dhammapada | > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 5 >Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 15:43:00 +0300 >From: Ecmel Berk Canl?er <me at ecmelberk.com> >To: gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu >Subject: [ANN] Moonlander: The fanciest Gemini client in the entire > solar system >Message-ID: <20200519154300.64815d02 at socimda> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII > >Hey all! > >I was working on this for the last weekend or so, and I believe it's >now ready enough to share. > >Announcing: Moonlander[1], the fanciest graphical Gemini client in the >entire solar system [citation needed]. > >[1]: https://sr.ht/~admicos/moonlander > >A screenshot: https://files.ecmelberk.com/img/1589891854.png > >Please note that it's still under development, and there are a lot of >known bugs. Still, why not take it for a spin? > > >The rest of this mail will be an excerpt from the readme file: >---- > >## Features > >- Custom, themeable rendering engine via Cairo & Pango >- Tries to follow Gnome HIG > >### Known Bugs > >- TLS Certificates aren't verified >- Somewhat high resource usage (for a Gemini client) >- No cross-protocol linking (yet) >- Cannot navigate backwards through redirections >- Renderer doesn't behave "native" > - Cannot select/copy text > - No interaction other than mouse clicks on links and scrolling > >### Planned Features > >- Tabs >- Render more than just text/gemini and plaintext. > - Planned: Markdown & images > >- Possibly support other protocols > - Gopher, etc. > - Definitely not HTTP, unless excluding HTML > >- Syntax highlighting (?) > - Waiting on text/gemini preformatting annotations to be somewhat > standardized > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 6 >Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:19:25 -0400 >From: Natalie Pendragon <natpen at natpen.net> >To: gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu >Subject: Extra GUS crawling this morning >Message-ID: <20200519141925.GC1613152 at goldfish.localdomain> >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii > >Hi all, > >Just FYI in case anyone is seeing the increased crawling traffic this >morning, GUS is getting some upgrades. And by upgrades I of course >mean it's now breaking in novel, unexpected ways. Fingers crossed it >should calm down soon! And once it does, GUS searches should be even >better (I noticed I wasn't handling relative links on pages well, so I >think the index has been missing a fair bit of content thus far). > >Natalie > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 7 >Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 14:34:46 +0000 >From: defdefred <defdefred at protonmail.com> >To: "A protocol that is slightly more complex than gopher, but > significantly simpler than HTTP" <gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu> >Subject: Re: [ANN] Moonlander: The fanciest Gemini client in the > entire solar system >Message-ID: > <MGUkWLg93GVCBByALEPBoIOvVh-hxhy3lsg9H1QkiIfwivIU8HZ4u_mdM1HU6_hw7HVN11Id aPSI42qQ2MLjTjhyEq8xUXTr2JhsDEsH37Q=@protonmail.com> > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > >On Tuesday 19 May 2020 14:43, Ecmel Berk Canl?er <me at ecmelberk.com> >wrote: >> - Render more than just text/gemini and plaintext. >> - Planned: Markdown & images >A Markdown Browser... what a nice idea! > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 8 >Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:09:14 -0500 >From: "Dunderpate" <dunderpate at sdf.org> >To: "Nicole Mazzuca" <nicole at strega-nil.co>, "A protocol that is > slightly more complex than gopher, but significantly simpler than > HTTP" <gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu> >Subject: Re: Announcing garnet, a new (soon-to-be) TUI client >Message-ID: <9673ce30bd6a8b98906cc47f50ee527c.squirrel at mx.sdf.org> >Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > >> Hey all! >> I've just recently started looking into Gemini, and I decided to try >and >> write my own little client. ???? I love what other people have done, >but >> something I've noticed is that a lot of existing clients don't >support >> Windows, so I thought I'd work on my own. ???? >> Additionally, I kinda wanted to play with Rust and localization >> technologies, so that's on full display here as well. ???? >> Here's the github page! https://github.com/strega-nil/garnet >> I warn you that it is... not feature complete at all. Currently, all >it >> does is request gemini pages and print the resulting response out >> directly. >> >> Thanks for checking it out y'all! >> Nicole >Hi Nicole, > >Can't wait to try this out. I'll probably take some time to dig through >the code to see how it works and how it's built as time allows. I'm >stuck >on Windows for my day-job, so having a nice Gemini client would be a >real >luxury :) > >Thanks for the time and effort you are putting into this project! >-- >Dunderpate > > > >------------------------------ > >Message: 9 >Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 10:12:59 -0500 >From: "Dunderpate" <dunderpate at sdf.org> >To: "A protocol that is slightly more complex than gopher, but > significantly simpler than HTTP" <gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu> >Subject: Re: Any Windows clients? >Message-ID: <fea0338c5bd0b17594fa5689ffcbc6d6.squirrel at mx.sdf.org> >Content-Type: text/plain;charset=iso-8859-1 > >> Il giorno gio 14 mag 2020 alle 13:29, Dunderpate <dunderpate at sdf.org> >> ha scritto: >>> I'm a big-time Linux user, bare-metal, and BSD guy. However, I'm >>> confined >>> to Windows for my day job :/ So, I was just wondering if anyone on >>> this >>> list knows of a Windows client floating around that I could use. >>> >> I didn't tried but I would say that Alrisha >> (https://git.sr.ht/~fabrixxm/alrisha) being pure Qt should run on >> windows without any problem... >Hi there! > >Thanks for the recommendation! I just had a chance to look into this >last >night and, unfortunately I'm not that comfortable creating a Qt account >just to install the tooling required to run qmake :/ I might be missing >something that allows me to bypass the account creation, but it's a >principle thing I guess LOL. The client itself seems nice enough >though, >and if they had pre-compiled builds I'd certainly use one of 'em. > >Thanks again :D >-- >Dunderpate > > > >------------------------------ > >Subject: Digest Footer > >Gemini mailing list >Gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu >https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/listinfo/gemini > > >------------------------------ > >End of Gemini Digest, Vol 10, Issue 50 >************************************** -- Sent from my Android phone with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity. -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20200519/0d2f b483/attachment-0001.htm>
On Tue, 19 May 2020 11:40:45 -0700 peteyboy at sdf.org wrote: > Cool! I just got Castor and mcross installed last night, but neither > works with alternate ports (not 1965) which I've had to host my > jetforce server on. So im stuck playing with authoring using V-98to > view. So if you could make sure gemini://url:port works, I'd love it. It *should* work. If you have an example server with a different port, please let me know and I'll try to make it work if it doesn't.
> Le 19 mai 2020 ? 23:01, Ecmel Berk Canl?er <me at ecmelberk.com> a ?crit : > > ?On Tue, 19 May 2020 11:40:45 -0700 > peteyboy at sdf.org wrote: > >> Cool! I just got Castor and mcross installed last night, but neither >> works with alternate ports (not 1965) which I've had to host my >> jetforce server on. So im stuck playing with authoring using V-98to >> view. So if you could make sure gemini://url:port works, I'd love it. > Pushed Castor 0.8.8 that should fix this issue.
It does work! Very nice! I appreciate it! On Wed, 20 May 2020, Ecmel Berk Canl?er wrote: > Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 21:00:17 > From: Ecmel Berk Canl?er <me at ecmelberk.com> > To: peteyboy at sdf.org > Cc: "A protocol that is slightly more complex than gopher, but significantly s > impler than HTTP" <gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu> > Subject: Re: [ANN] Moonlander: The fanciest Gemini client in the entiresolar > system > > On Tue, 19 May 2020 11:40:45 -0700 > peteyboy at sdf.org wrote: > >> Cool! I just got Castor and mcross installed last night, but neither >> works with alternate ports (not 1965) which I've had to host my >> jetforce server on. So im stuck playing with authoring using V-98to >> view. So if you could make sure gemini://url:port works, I'd love it. > > It *should* work. If you have an example server with a different port, > please let me know and I'll try to make it work if it doesn't. > peteyboy at sdf.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org
Oh, at least for awhile, I've left my server running in a tmux session, accessible via: gemini://peteyboy.freeshell.org:32056 If I keep that jetforce server running, I probably will need to put in a cron job with a dtach session or something. On Wed, 20 May 2020, Ecmel Berk Canl?er wrote: > Date: Tue, 19 May 2020 21:00:17 > From: Ecmel Berk Canl?er <me at ecmelberk.com> > To: peteyboy at sdf.org > Cc: "A protocol that is slightly more complex than gopher, but significantly s > impler than HTTP" <gemini at lists.orbitalfox.eu> > Subject: Re: [ANN] Moonlander: The fanciest Gemini client in the entiresolar > system > > On Tue, 19 May 2020 11:40:45 -0700 > peteyboy at sdf.org wrote: > >> Cool! I just got Castor and mcross installed last night, but neither >> works with alternate ports (not 1965) which I've had to host my >> jetforce server on. So im stuck playing with authoring using V-98to >> view. So if you could make sure gemini://url:port works, I'd love it. > > It *should* work. If you have an example server with a different port, > please let me know and I'll try to make it work if it doesn't. > peteyboy at sdf.org SDF Public Access UNIX System - http://sdf.org
---
Previous Thread: Someone's client struggles with relative URLs