💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › s › Gemini › 15017 captured on 2024-05-26 at 15:08:55. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2024-05-10)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
So, in case there are more people who know this stuff here, is it *in practice* possible to have a Gemini server on a bare IP? So far I haven't seen a single server that can do it, but then again I haven't checked in a while. Currently I've chosen to use Gemini-like simple HTML pages (over Yggdrasil), but still curious if things changed.
Feb 14 · 3 months ago
🕹️ skyjake [mod...] · Feb 14 at 17:32:
Not sure what issues you've run into with other servers, but generally you'd just configure the server normally and use the IP address as the domain/host name. For example, here's GmCapsule running on my (somewhat static) IP:
The configuration is simple:
[server] host = 85.156.143.233 port = 1968 [static] root = .
The static file being server is "./85.156.143.233/index.gmi".
You should note that the server certificate must use the IP address as the common name or subject alternative name.
I'm using 1968 in this example because skyjake.fi/geminispace.org runs on 1965.
☕️ tenno-seremel [OP] · Feb 14 at 18:21:
@skyjake Hm, when I try to visit gemini://85.156.143.233:1968/ elpher says: Gemini server reports PERMANENT FAILURE for this request: 59 Missing TLS server name indication 🤔 Unless that was meant as just an example.
🕹️ skyjake [mod...] · Feb 14 at 18:31:
IIRC Gemini clients should always use SNI when making requests. Perhaps elpher does not set it when using an IP address? Should try a few different clients and see how they work.
As far as GmCapsule is concerned, I suppose I could change it to allow requests to go through when using a bare IP address even if SNI is not included in the TLS session.
@skyjake RFC 6066 says: Literal IPv4 and IPv6 addresses are not permitted in "HostName". So I think elpher is correct here?
🕹️ skyjake [mod...] · Feb 14 at 18:53:
@mbays You are correct.
It seems there is a bug in Lagrange here because it sets SNI even with literal addresses. And in fact the Gemini specification only requires SNI when a hostname is being used.
So, I have two bugs to fix here. 😅
😎 flipperzero · Feb 16 at 02:11:
IDK if this is universal, but i've been able to connect to direct IP's over gemini w.o issue. I guess it's a bug as detailed here. Cheers! (Has thought about doing this too, but dont wanna risk fams IP, gonna get a hotspot soon tho so <_<_<_<_<_<_<_<_<_<)
@skyjake So after the bug is fixed, does that mean that it won't be possible to host on a bare IP?
@flipperzero What does fams IP mean?
🕹️ skyjake [mod...] · Feb 17 at 08:41:
@zorg No, it means hosting on a bare IP is better supported since it won't require SNI from the client any more.