💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › Half_Elf_Monk › 16048 captured on 2024-05-12 at 19:16:55. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2024-05-10)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-26)

🚧 View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Comment by 🌲 Half_Elf_Monk

Re: "A potential mental model: we cannot communicate. I need to *..."

In: s/permacomputing

@gyaradong - I've always wondered how successful (or prudent) the voyager record would be. It seems like it assumes quite a bit about the intelligent life that finds it, friendliness being a HUGE first assumption.

🌲 Half_Elf_Monk

Apr 09 · 5 weeks ago

2 Later Comments ↓

🐉 gyaradong [OP/mod] · Apr 19 at 09:45:

Sorry for the late reply I've been away. Yeah I was thinking human and though not English, I was thinking it would be clear when correctly parsing the file. So if an image you could see it, and if text then, yes you could read it (assuming shared language).

Humans have specific hearing ranges and only specific wavelength sensitivity. It means our encoding would be for pixels which fundamentally don't make sense. Aliens would struggle with that.

🌲 Half_Elf_Monk [...] · May 01 at 14:11:

@gyaradong - a shared language makes this easy enough, imo. When establishing a connection, dialup modems would transmit blocks of frequency at the "1" bit and the "0" bit, in a regular tempo, to establish a baseline.

If we're granting a shared language, couldn't each file that's being sent do something similar, and transmit (for example) 256 characters as part of the header, to establish "this is the ascii table, and how thus to interpret the content that follows"

Now we can communicate in our shared language, because the header included a key to decode whatever set of signals followed.

If you meant that the file being sent should also imply a program of executable code... then... i don't know. you'd have to assume similar architecture for the machines reading the code, and that's a big ask. So *automatically* constructing an implied program to parse file contents is tough. Manually decrypting file contents based on a character table and a shared language seems easy.

Original Post

🌒 s/permacomputing

A potential mental model: we cannot communicate. I need to *imply* a computer program by giving you a file to parse, based on the file contents, but I also need to create the file contents based on what you would also want the file contents to be given that we have the shared goal of independently writing a program to parse the file. Therefore we do not need to share anything and can write the program. Is this possible?

💬 gyaradong [mod] · 6 comments · 2023-10-31 · 6 months ago