💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › norayr › 4878 captured on 2024-05-12 at 18:59:49. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2024-05-10)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-26)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Comment by 🐙 norayr

Re: "is the fedi instance identified by some cryptographic key..."

In: s/Fediverse

hey, sorry for the late reply.

i don't like mastodon's tech decisions, i mean usage of ruby and js, it works very slow and heavy on weaker machines.

i like gotosocial - it is fast, and it is lightweight because of the technology behind it - go language.

i opened an issue there and gotosocial devs replied that it is in their plans to prepare a migration from mastodon.

i host mastodon, but for my personal account i host socialhome, which is written in python. it can connect both to diaspora and activity pub. and socialhome is even more heavy than mastodon.

🐙 norayr [OP]

2023-08-29 · 8 months ago

1 Later Comment

🐙 norayr [OP] · 2023-08-29 at 14:19:

@dimkr, i don't know why i didn't comment back then, because i remember i have read it. i guess something distracted me. thank you very much for the explanation. eventually i understand. so user keys, not the instance keys.

now i get it.

Original Post

🌒 s/Fediverse

is the fedi instance identified by some cryptographic key pair? what if one replaces fedi software on the same domain? let's say i find a way to figure out and migrate the database of socialhome i host to tootik or gotosocial. or i just replace socialhome with gotosocial on the same domain. does each fedi instance also have some keypair that also has to be migrated, so that new instance on the same domain would be accepted by other fedi instances that already established connection with...

💬 norayr · 6 comments · 1 like · 2023-07-26 · 10 months ago