💾 Archived View for blitter.com › icking-music-archive.sunsite.dk › scores › scarlatti › sonatas.htm… captured on 2024-05-12 at 17:15:45.
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-17)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
<!doctype html public "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2 Final//EN">
<html>
<title>Domenico Scarlatti - the Sheet Music</title>
<meta name="Description" content="Presenting a free edition of the complete harpsichord
sonatas of Domenico Scarlatti">
<body background="backmus.jpg" bgcolor="#E8E8F0" text="#000060" link=red vlink="#000060">
<h1 align=center>Domenico Scarlatti - the Sheet Music</h1>
<p>
The purpose of this sheet music publication is to enable as many harpsichordists as possible
to play Scarlatti's music as he would have played it.
<p>
It is formatted so it can be printed portrait orientation on modern A4 or North American letter
paper. (The original manuscripts are mostly 37x26 cm landscape.) The files are in Postscript
code, which may be easily printed on almost all computers with free software such as
<a href="http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~ghost/index.html">GhostScript</a>.
PostScript code may also be edited directly with a text editor, or WYSIWYG with several
graphical editors.
<h2> Why Yet Another Scarlatti Edition? </h2>
<p>
First, this one is free, it doesn't cost a thousand dollars or more. But there is another reason.
<p align=center>
<img src="venice.gif" width=580 height=302 alt="[a fragment of the manuscript]">
<p>
In the original manuscripts of the Scarlatti sonatas, notes are divided between the two staves
at middle C, not to indicate whether the right or left hand should be used. Note stem directions
were mostly chosen for maximum readability of the score. The apportionment between hands
in the Longo edition was done by Longo, writing as a piano player long after Scarlatti's style
had fallen into disuse, and omits many of the hand assignments in Scarlatti's original text, let
alone showing the variety of hand-over-hand variations possible in a piece.
<p>
There are many treatises of Scarlatti's time on ornamentation, phrasing, variation and other
such essentials of his musicianship. But, these all omit Scarlatti's hand crossing style because
his playing and music were unique in this respect. Almost all of his music is written with
implied pauses in one hand or the other that permit variations in hand crossings - right over or
under left, left over or under right, even intermixed. From the consistency of these pauses
throughout his music, I am convinced that this was the primary variation technique that he
used. I believe that you should be able to play most Scarlatti phrases with either hand
interchangeably, and make them sound exactly the same either way, if you are to understand
his keyboard technique.
<p>
This edition presents the results of my study of Scarlatti, by writing out examples of hand
crossings in the style I consider Scarlatti likely used while playing. It follows the numbering
of Kirkpatrick ("Domenico Scarlatti", Ralph Kirkpatrick, Princeton,1953), and assumes the
use of a single manual harpsichord. Scarlatti's sounds do not transfer at all well to modern
pianos, although his breathtaking technique does, as Vladimir Horowitz amply demonstrated.
Piano players will have to adapt the music to their instrument. (I still don't know how
Horowitz managed such speed on instruments with the incredibly heavy actions of the concert
grands he used!)
<p>
No one who knows only Czerny-derived technique, with its expectation that arms remain at
right angles to the keyboard, will be able to play even half the variations shown in the
manuscripts. You must learn to play with arms completely parallel to the keyboard, with
finger action like legs walking, in order to play with hands crossed to the extent Scarlatti
wrote. A bass interval played with the right hand is done with thumb on the upper note, not the
lower. Left hand bass octave runs are played with thumb action similar to the heel-and-toeing
of organists and 5th finger crossing over the 4th, not thumping the way pianists are taught
today. Rapidly repeated notes on a harpsichord may be smoothly played with one finger, as if
they were half a trill. Scarlatti explicitly noted when he wanted the rougher sound of 'changed
fingers', a two-fingered 'trill' on one note - most can not be played as written with four fingers
flailing the way pianists are taught today. And so on. Using techniques of Scarlatti's time, on a
keyboard of his time, these sonatas can indeed be played the way they are written here.
However, when I made my recordings, I used fingerings that made them sound their best.
Wild hand crossings belong in front of a live audience, intricate ones are for private
enjoyment. Neither work in a recording studio.
<p>
There were several pianofortes and at least one 2-manual harpsichord at the Spanish court, and
some of the sonatas appear to have been written for each. As Kirkpatrick has shown, however,
no instruments at the court other than the Spanish single-manual harpsichords had the note
compass needed to play all of the sonatas. One might think that occurrences of things like an
8th note + 8th rest in parallel with a 16th rest + same note 16th + 2 other 16th notes would
indicate 2-manual usage. But, when I go through all the sonatas in detail, I'm convinced that it
didn't to Scarlatti: I can find no correlation with overlapped notes vs. non-overlapped. This
usage seems designed to say something about musical context, not about manual usage. What
I can say is that about a fifth of the sonatas work with two manual overlapped-note sound, but
that I find the one manual sounds to be more consistent across the oeuvre.
<h2> Editorial Philosophy </h2>
<p>
A manuscript, originally presented to Queen Maria Barbara of Spain, is preserved in its
original 16 volume binding at the Biblioteca Marciana in Venice, Italy. A second copy, mostly
in the same hand and apparently made at the same time for Scarlatti's own use, is kept at the
Biblioteca Palatina in Parma. Ralph Kirkpatrick arranged for the publication in facsimile of
the Parma manuscript, and of some other Scarlatti pieces preserved only in derivative
collections. As a result of Kirkpatrick's publication, the content of his manuscripts is free from
copyright and ownership restrictions, and is the authority for this edition.
<p>
However, printing is black and white, and music isn't. A musician has to peer through the
limitations of notation to hear a live person, the composer, then bring that composer's ideas to
life in the performer's world. Successful users of this edition must do the same. In Scarlatti's
time, a performer was expected to be as able a musician as the composer. Music was read and
re-created, not memorised note for note. I do not know when it became acceptable to play
absolutely identical repeats, but it was after Scarlatti's time! Notation was intended to
communicate the essence of the music rather than to prescribe how to play it. Performers were
reminded of the composer's usual stylistic elements only occasionally, rather than by writing
them out in full. This edition does the same.
<p>
Every note and duration from the Parma manuscript is preserved. You will find no modern
'interpretation' or 'corrections' here in that respect. I have avoided like the plague that panacea
of small minds, 'regularization' of original variation. Beaming is preserved whenever possible,
as Scarlatti often used it to indicate articulation. Triple time was indicated then with an extra
beam (e.g. 3 beams for triplet 16ths) compared to today's practise - this has been modernised.
(In a few instances, I have had to simplify Scarlatti's beaming in complex passages to make
the score legible with modern typesetting.)
<p>
Scarlatti wrote almost all note heads with separate stems, as if they were separate voices,
even when they obviously aren't. Close-spaced notes of identical length that sound as chords
are stemmed together here for clarity. Hopefully, you will find the result visually matches
the hand motions required to play them, and clearer to read than the original. When such
chords cross staves, the original beaming is usually shown only on one staff (usually the
lower), not all over both as Scarlatti did, for clarity in reading. In some cases, notes in
the Parma manuscript have been lengthened by converting a solid note to an open one, or
adding a dot. Since these changes are essentially all in the direction of converting the
notation from a part-oriented one to an as-played one, and appear to have been done at the
time, I have used the modified durations - this is a player's edition.
<p>
Scarlatti used what is now interpreted as a double-sided repeat bar (:||:) to end both the first
and second halves of almost all of his sonatas. He was so meticulous about writing all
repeated passages out in full that I consider that the :||: bar was used primarily as an
ornamental device. In order to avoid confusion with modern use of the symbol, I have used a
plain double bar to separate the first half from the second, and an end bar to end each whole
sonata. Occasionally, a single bar, often of fractional length or containing solely the part for
one clef, is enclosed in :| and |: brackets between the first and second half. These are obviously
optional passages, to be used when one half is being repeated, but the usage is so inconsistent
and sketchy that I felt it best to omit them. Readers should remember that performers were
expected to provide graceful transitions between sections of music, cadenzas even, and not be
rigid in their performance of this music.
<img src="notation.jpg" align=right width=200 height=380>
<p>
Scarlatti's music ranges over the keyboard to such an extent that he had to write his music on a
staff pair, using ledger lines only for middle C and for notes below the bass or above the treble
clef limits. If one staff is used for each hand, his music becomes an illegible mess of clefs (top
right, from the Santini copy) or ledger lines (middle right, Longo edition). If each hand change
is marked throughout, the music also can be confusing to read (bottom right, from the
Fitzwilliam manuscript). However, showing detailed hand dispositions by two note shapes
works well - I am indebted to the skilled programmers of
<a href="http://www.cs.uu.nl/people/hanwen/lilypond/">Lilypond</a>
for agreeing to provide them for this edition. A diamond note head indicates the left hand, the
usual oval head the right. Notes that Scarlatti did make concerning hand crossings are
preserved in the form he wrote them, D (dritta, right) and M (manca, left), in the first example
of their occurrence in each sonata.
<p>
Scarlatti showed a variety of articulation for many passages - I do the same for hand
assignments. Readers are expected to play enough of the sonatas from this edition to be able to
choose an effective performance style for them, and to not parrot the samples as shown. The
right and left hand note shapes chosen have similar visual weight to facilitate this.
Usually, due to the short length of the sonatas, a single pattern of variation should be
chosen for consistent use throughout a piece for performance, using a complementary variation
for repeats if they are played. Mostly, I
show examples that are visible to an audience. There are hundreds of other workable ones
that are fun to use among friends, if the reader chooses.
<p>
Variations in hand usage and articulation imply variations in the lengths used for notes.
Appropriate note durations in Scarlatti depend very much on the way the piece is played. In
particular,
<a href="http://www.geocities.com/Vienna/Studio/1714/sustain.html">lengthening notes</a>
is an essential aspect of good harpsichord sound. But, I have a horror of editions by, in
Thurston Dart's memorable phrase, "Herr X, amended by Dr Y, and thoroughly revised by the
eminent pianist, Mr Z" - I have seen too many of them. Scarlatti normally set note lengths to
form separate, although often fragmentary, voices rather than to prescribe the length to be
played. Some must be modified on a single-manual instrument. Some must also be modified
to match the hand disposition chosen. His durations are perfectly legible to the modern reader,
so I leave it to you to turn them into music as he did, on your instrument, in your
surroundings, as you play it.
<p>
Scarlatti generally used the same notation for acciaccatura and appoggiatura - a small 1/32nd
note. Since modern players are mostly unaccustomed to the distinction, I have written them as
they should be played, according to my judgement. Those I interpret as acciaccaturas are
written as simultaneously struck full-length notes - Scarlatti often wrote them as such when
they formed part of chords. Those I interpret as appoggiaturas are realised in the standard
baroque manner. Both such usages appear with a smaller note head than the rest of the text, as
Scarlatti wrote them, to indicate that they should not be played rigidly as written.
<p>
Scarlatti used the baroque trill symbol and <i>tr</i>, for tremulo, apparently interchangeably
as a general sign for a note to be stressed. Since modern players are accustomed to play trills
in the later classical manner, I have used the baroque symbol throughout. The symbol usually
means a trill, starting on the upper note and not terminated by a turn - Scarlatti wrote most
terminations out using 1/32nd notes. However, it can instead imply an acciaccatura,
appoggiatura, inverted mordant (several of which appear in other copies of the sonatas made at
the time), short trill, or nothing at all, depending on the context, the instrument used, its
acoustic surroundings, and the tempo of performance. So, an editor cannot pre-choose their
performance. Players who wish performance examples are referred to my
<a href="http://www.geocities.com/Vienna/Studio/1714/scarlattirec.html">recordings</a>.
<p>
Accidentals here follow modern usage - an accidental continues until the end of the bar.
Scarlatti normally used a flat to cancel a key signature sharp, but a natural to cancel a key
signature flat. Sometimes, a natural was used to cancel an accidental preceding it in the bar,
but usually accidentals were written on each affected note and did not apply to other notes.
However, when space was tight, and it was considered obvious to a player of the time what the
proper pitch was, accidentals were omitted. I have used my best judgement to interpret
ambiguous cases. Scarlatti's E# and B# are replaced by F and C respectively, following
modern practise. I have retained Scarlatti's other enharmonics (i.e. Eb vs. D#) except when it
would impair legibility of the music with modern notation.
<p>
For the few sonatas apparently intended for violin and continuo, I have provided a realization
suitable for my violin and harpsichord playing. Despite the thousands of pages written on the
subject, there is only one real 'rule' for realizing a continuo - it should make the soloist sound
fantastic. That depends so much on the instruments, surrounding acoustics and social
ambiance that no editor can do it for you. In form it can range from totally self-effacing
support to a full-blown trio sonata for solist and harpsichord or gamba. You should adapt the
examples I give, or write your own, for your performances.
<p>
<a href="mailto:bf250@freenet.carleton.ca">John Sankey</a>
<br><a href="http://www.geocities.com/Vienna/Studio/1714/harpsichord.html">Harpsichordist to the Internet</a>
</body>
</html>