💾 Archived View for gemi.dev › gemini-mailing-list › 000356.gmi captured on 2024-05-12 at 16:04:14. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-12-28)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hello Geminauts, This is my first post here but I have been lurking for awhile. The thread about archiving led me just now to read about the Right to be Forgotten for the first time. It?s not something that I?ve ever heard anyone talk about in Canada, didn?t realize it was an active controversy in Europe. It raises interesting questions - is it possible to take information off the internet? Is it effectively gone for most people when you remove it from Google? What is more important - the value of the public in knowing what happened, or the value to the individual in getting on with his life after making a mistake? For Gemini protocol, I feel like if it becomes important enough to people, an archive is likely to be created whether we want it or not. There?s probably some value in the community itself proactively creating a sanctioned archive itself that respects creators? reasonable desires to have their content taken offline on demand. Regards, Peter
Am 04.09.20 um 23:46 schrieb Peter Deal: > Hello Geminauts, > > This is my first post here but I have been lurking for awhile. > > The thread about archiving led me just now to read about the Right to be Forgotten for the first time. It?s not something that I?ve ever heard anyone talk about in Canada, didn?t realize it was an active controversy in Europe. It raises interesting questions - is it possible to take information off the internet? Is it effectively gone for most people when you remove it from Google? What is more important - the value of the public in knowing what happened, or the value to the individual in getting on with his life after making a mistake? > > For Gemini protocol, I feel like if it becomes important enough to people, an archive is likely to be created whether we want it or not. There?s probably some value in the community itself proactively creating a sanctioned archive itself that respects creators? reasonable desires to have their content taken offline on demand. > > Regards, > Peter Hello Everyone, the right to be forgotten is something we here in Germany are discussing for quite some time. There is a semigood wikipedia article about it here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_be_forgotten Personally I think, if you put it up online visible to everyone, there is a chance, that someone will take your content and save it. Either for himself or for others. You can not protect that other than handing out passwords to people who want to read your content. But then it makes not much sense to put it up and online. Then you could also send it via email. I personally like the idea of an internet archive. Respecting the copyright. But if you give your copyright away by posting something unter a CC licencse or similiar, then you give away your content which could then be archived. -- Carsten -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20200905/450b 73dd/attachment.htm>
On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 15:32:10 +0200
cblte <cblte at envs.net> wrote:
> Am 04.09.20 um 23:46 schrieb Peter Deal:
> > Hello Geminauts,
> >
> > This is my first post here but I have been lurking for awhile.
> >
> > The thread about archiving led me just now to read about the Right
> > to be Forgotten for the first time. It?s not something that I?ve
> > ever heard anyone talk about in Canada, didn?t realize it was an
> > active controversy in Europe. It raises interesting questions - is
> > it possible to take information off the internet? Is it effectively
> > gone for most people when you remove it from Google? What is more
> > important - the value of the public in knowing what happened, or
> > the value to the individual in getting on with his life after
> > making a mistake?
> >
> > For Gemini protocol, I feel like if it becomes important enough to
> > people, an archive is likely to be created whether we want it or
> > not. There?s probably some value in the community itself
> > proactively creating a sanctioned archive itself that respects
> > creators? reasonable desires to have their content taken offline on
> > demand.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Peter
>
> Hello Everyone,
> the right to be forgotten is something we here in Germany are
> discussing for quite some time. There is a semigood wikipedia article
> about it here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_be_forgotten
>
> Personally I think, if you put it up online visible to everyone,
> there is a chance, that someone will take your content and save it.
> Either for himself or for others. You can not protect that other than
> handing out passwords to people who want to read your content. But
> then it makes not much sense to put it up and online. Then you could
> also send it via email.
>
> I personally like the idea of an internet archive. Respecting the
> copyright. But if you give your copyright away by posting something
> unter a CC licencse or similiar, then you give away your content
> which could then be archived.
>
> -- Carsten
>
I strongly disagree. In the beginning of the web it was largely Open
Content as described here: http://www.opencontent.org/ . All work is
derivative work. People who make actual websites, not scrape together
random half-broken crap from stack overflow and wordpress plugins
surfed the web, saw something they liked, looked at the source and
added it to their own site.
Copyright, or more specifically Intellectual property is a completely
broken system and one that does not apply to cyberspace. All it serves
to do is prop up broken business models, justify censorship and spyware
in the name of saving reality a few reality tv shows.
The fundamental difference between meatspace and cyberspace is that
copying something is free in cyberspace. It takes effort to reproduce a
physical book. It does not cost anything at all to copy a digital book
or other digital work.
Intellectual Property law works on creating artificial scarcity. An
economy based on artificial scarcity is not a sustainable one. Nor
should we be designing technical specifications around something as
flimsy as that.
I would highly encourage you to watch Cory Doctorow's speech "The
coming war on general computation" as he explores these ideas in depth.
http://mirror.fem-net.de/CCC/28C3/mp4-h264-HQ/28c3-4848-en-the_coming_war_o
n_general_computation_h264.mp4
Any attempts to incorporate copyright into technical systems ultimately
leads to rootkits and malware. aka 'trusted computing/DRM'. As
engineers please try to understand the full ramifications of this. We
already live in an age where all post 9/11 CPUs manufactured by Intel
come with mandatory backdoors/hardware spyware implants you can't turn
off called Intel Management Engine. They implement a DRM called PAVP
(Protected Audio Video Path). It's wired directly into your onboard
Intel network interface and has hypervisor level access to all system
memory.
There are other ways to financially back projects. We live in the age
of self-publishing. A giant printing press is no longer required to get
your word out. The backing of a giant publishing corporation is no
longer required. We live in an age where individuals, not groups are
the primary producers of artistic goods. The thing we want to
incentive is the creation of these goods not the reproduction of
already existing goods. As the initial production is the costly part.
This is where business models like Patreon comes in. Now I'm not saying
Patreon themselves are good, but the business model here is that of
other individuals who like some content are able to directly fund the
creation of more of said content. No matter how niche that content may
be.
--
________________________________________
/ The other day I... uh, no, that wasn't \
| me. |
| |
\ -- Steven Wright /
----------------------------------------
\
\
/\ /\
//\\_//\\ ____
\_ _/ / /
/ * * \ /^^^]
\_\O/_/ [ ]
/ \_ [ /
\ \_ / /
[ [ / \/ _/
_[ [ \ /_/
On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 14:47:50 -0700
Tom <tgrom.automail at nuegia.net> wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Sep 2020 15:32:10 +0200
> cblte <cblte at envs.net> wrote:
>
> > Am 04.09.20 um 23:46 schrieb Peter Deal:
> > > Hello Geminauts,
> > >
> > > This is my first post here but I have been lurking for awhile.
> > >
> > > The thread about archiving led me just now to read about the Right
> > > to be Forgotten for the first time. It?s not something that I?ve
> > > ever heard anyone talk about in Canada, didn?t realize it was an
> > > active controversy in Europe. It raises interesting questions - is
> > > it possible to take information off the internet? Is it
> > > effectively gone for most people when you remove it from Google?
> > > What is more important - the value of the public in knowing what
> > > happened, or the value to the individual in getting on with his
> > > life after making a mistake?
> > >
> > > For Gemini protocol, I feel like if it becomes important enough to
> > > people, an archive is likely to be created whether we want it or
> > > not. There?s probably some value in the community itself
> > > proactively creating a sanctioned archive itself that respects
> > > creators? reasonable desires to have their content taken offline
> > > on demand.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Peter
> >
> > Hello Everyone,
> > the right to be forgotten is something we here in Germany are
> > discussing for quite some time. There is a semigood wikipedia
> > article about it here
> > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_be_forgotten
> >
> > Personally I think, if you put it up online visible to everyone,
> > there is a chance, that someone will take your content and save it.
> > Either for himself or for others. You can not protect that other
> > than handing out passwords to people who want to read your content.
> > But then it makes not much sense to put it up and online. Then you
> > could also send it via email.
> >
> > I personally like the idea of an internet archive. Respecting the
> > copyright. But if you give your copyright away by posting something
> > unter a CC licencse or similiar, then you give away your content
> > which could then be archived.
> >
> > -- Carsten
> >
>
> I strongly disagree. In the beginning of the web it was largely Open
> Content as described here: http://www.opencontent.org/ . All work is
> derivative work. People who make actual websites, not scrape together
> random half-broken crap from stack overflow and wordpress plugins
> surfed the web, saw something they liked, looked at the source and
> added it to their own site.
>
> Copyright, or more specifically Intellectual property is a completely
> broken system and one that does not apply to cyberspace. All it serves
> to do is prop up broken business models, justify censorship and
> spyware in the name of saving reality a few reality tv shows.
>
> The fundamental difference between meatspace and cyberspace is that
> copying something is free in cyberspace. It takes effort to reproduce
> a physical book. It does not cost anything at all to copy a digital
> book or other digital work.
>
> Intellectual Property law works on creating artificial scarcity. An
> economy based on artificial scarcity is not a sustainable one. Nor
> should we be designing technical specifications around something as
> flimsy as that.
>
> I would highly encourage you to watch Cory Doctorow's speech "The
> coming war on general computation" as he explores these ideas in
> depth.
> http://mirror.fem-net.de/CCC/28C3/mp4-h264-HQ/28c3-4848-en-the_coming_war
_on_general_computation_h264.mp4
>
> Any attempts to incorporate copyright into technical systems
> ultimately leads to rootkits and malware. aka 'trusted
> computing/DRM'. As engineers please try to understand the full
> ramifications of this. We already live in an age where all post 9/11
> CPUs manufactured by Intel come with mandatory backdoors/hardware
> spyware implants you can't turn off called Intel Management Engine.
> They implement a DRM called PAVP (Protected Audio Video Path). It's
> wired directly into your onboard Intel network interface and has
> hypervisor level access to all system memory.
>
> There are other ways to financially back projects. We live in the age
> of self-publishing. A giant printing press is no longer required to
> get your word out. The backing of a giant publishing corporation is no
> longer required. We live in an age where individuals, not groups are
> the primary producers of artistic goods. The thing we want to
> incentive is the creation of these goods not the reproduction of
> already existing goods. As the initial production is the costly part.
> This is where business models like Patreon comes in. Now I'm not
> saying Patreon themselves are good, but the business model here is
> that of other individuals who like some content are able to directly
> fund the creation of more of said content. No matter how niche that
> content may be.
>
Hello, I just wanted to followup with a middle-ground, or a re-word
rather on the proposed no-archive tag. Rather than a no-archive tag I
think a private-archive-only, no-public-archive, or
request-no-public-republish tag would do the same thing, and also
reflect reality better.
Even with a no-archive tag there's nothing you can practically do to
stop someone from doing something with the data ounce it is copied over
the network to their computer, however you REQUEST that whoever made
that archive, kindly do to republish publicly this specific tagged
document in a public archive.
This says nothing about what the individual choose to do on their own
hard drive or private members server or intranet, Private Library, or
what have you. Archival or cataloging software could very easily take
this into account and unlist content from publicly available indexes,
but still leave it up to the software operator if they want to also
unlist those documents for logged-in users, admins, or private library
members.
If we had to vote on the name of that tag, I personally prefer
no-public-archive.
--
________________________________________
/ You may be marching to the beat of a \
| different drummer, but you're still in |
\ the parade. /
----------------------------------------
\
\
/\ /\
//\\_//\\ ____
\_ _/ / /
/ * * \ /^^^]
\_\O/_/ [ ]
/ \_ [ /
\ \_ / /
[ [ / \/ _/
_[ [ \ /_/
---