💾 Archived View for radia.bortzmeyer.org › rfc-mirror › rfc2723.txt captured on 2024-05-10 at 19:03:21.
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-06-14)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Network Working Group N. Brownlee
Request for Comments: 2723 The University of Auckland
Category: Informational October 1999
SRL: A Language for Describing Traffic Flows and
Specifying Actions for Flow Groups
Status of this Memo
This memo provides information for the Internet community. It does
not specify an Internet standard of any kind. Distribution of this
memo is unlimited.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
Abstract
This document describes a language for specifying rulesets, i.e.
configuration files which may be loaded into a traffic flow meter so
as to specify which traffic flows are measured by the meter, and the
information it will store for each flow.
Table of Contents
1 Purpose and Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.1 RTFM Meters and Traffic Flows . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.2 SRL Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2 SRL Language Description . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.1 Define Directive . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
2.2 Program . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.3 Declaration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3 Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
3.1 IF_statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1.1 expression . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1.2 term . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1.3 factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1.4 operand_list . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1.5 operand . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
3.1.6 Test Part . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
3.1.7 Action Part . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.8 ELSE Clause . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.2 Compound_statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.3 Imperative_statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.3.1 SAVE Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
3.3.2 COUNT Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Brownlee Informational [Page 1]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
3.3.3 EXIT Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.3.4 IGNORE Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.3.5 NOMATCH Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.3.6 STORE Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.3.7 RETURN Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.4 Subroutine_declaration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
3.5 CALL_statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
4 Example Programs . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.1 Classify IP Port Numbers . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.2 Classify Traffic into Groups of Networks . . . . . . . . 14
5 Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
6 IANA Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
7 APPENDICES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
7.1 Appendix A: SRL Syntax in BNF . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
7.2 Appendix B: Syntax for Values and Masks . . . . . . . . . 18
7.3 Appendix C: RTFM Attribute Information . . . . . . . . . 19
8 Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
9 References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
10 Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
11 Full Copyright Statement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 22
1 Purpose and Scope
A ruleset for an RTFM Meter is a sequence of instructions to be
executed by the meter's Pattern Matching Engine (PME). The form of
these instructions is described in detail in the 'RTFM Architecture'
and 'RTFM Meter MIB' documents [RTFM-ARC, RTFM-MIB], but most users -
at least initially - find them confusing and difficult to write,
mainly because the effect of each instruction is strongly dependent
on the state of the meter's Packet Matching Engine at the moment of
its execution.
SRL (the Simple Ruleset Language) is a procedural language for
creating RTFM rulesets. It has been designed to be simple for people
to understand, using statements which help to clarify the execution
context in which they operate. SRL programs will be compiled into
rulesets which can then be downloaded to RTFM meters.
An SRL compiler is available as part of NeTraMet (a free-software
implementation of the RTFM meter and manager), version 4.2
[NETRAMET].
1.1 RTFM Meters and Traffic Flows
The RTFM Architecture [RTFM-ARC] defines a set of 'attributes' which
apply to network traffic. Among the attributes are 'address
attributes,' such as PeerType, PeerAddress, TransType and
TransAddress, which have meaning for many protocols, e.g. for IPv4
Brownlee Informational [Page 2]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
traffic (PeerType == 1) PeerAddress is an IP address, TransType is
TCP(6), UDP(17), ICMP(1), etc., and TransAddress is usually an IP
port number.
An 'RTFM Traffic Flow' is simply a stream of packets observed by a
meter as they pass across a network between two end points (or
to/from a single end point). Each 'end point' of a flow is specified
by the set of values of its address attributes.
An 'RTFM Meter' is a measuring device - e.g. a program running on a
Unix or PC host - which observes passing packets and builds 'Flow
Data Records' for the flows of interest.
RTFM traffic flows have another important property - they are bi-
directional. This means that each flow data record in the meter has
two sets of counters, one for packets travelling from source to
destination, the other for returning packets. Within the RTFM
architecture such counters appear as further attributes of the flow.
An RTFM meter must be configured by the user, which means creating a
'Ruleset' so as to specify which flows are to be measured, and how
much information (i.e. which attributes) should be stored for each of
them. A ruleset is effectively a program for a minimal virtual
machine, the 'Packet Matching Engine (PME),' which is described in
detail in [RTFM-ARC]. An RTFM meter may run multiple rule sets, with
every passing packet being processed by each of the rulesets. The
rule 'actions' in this document are described as though only a single
ruleset were running.
In the past creating a ruleset has meant writing machine code for the
PME, which has proved rather difficult to do. SRL provides a high-
level language which should enable users to create effective rulesets
without having to understand the details of the PME.
The language may be useful in other applications, being suitable for
any application area which involves selecting traffic flows from a
stream of packets.
1.2 SRL Overview
An SRL program is executed from the beginning for each new packet
arriving at the meter. It has two essential goals.
(a) Decide whether the current packet is part of a flow which is of
interest and, if necessary, determine its direction (i.e. decide
which of its end-points is considered to be its source). Other
packets will be ignored.
Brownlee Informational [Page 3]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
(b) SAVE whatever information is required to identify the flow and
accumulate (COUNT) quantitative information for that flow.
At execution, the meter's Packet Matching Engine (PME) begins by
using source and destination attributes as they appear 'on the wire.'
If the attributes do not match those of a flow to be recorded, the
PME will normally execute the program again, this time with the
source and destination addresses interchanged. Because of this bi-
directional matching, an RTFM meter is able to build up tables of
flows with two sets of counters - one for forward packets, the other
for backward packets. The programmer can, if required, suppress the
reverse-direction matching and assign 'forward' and 'backward'
directions which conform to the conventions of the external context.
Goal (a) is achieved using IF statements which perform comparisons on
information from the packet or from SRL variables. Goal (b) is
achieved using one or more SAVE statements to store the flow's
identification attributes; a COUNT statement then increments the
statistical data accumulating for it.
2 SRL Language Description
The SRL language is explained below using 'railway diagrams' to
describe the syntax. Flow through a diagram is from left to right.
The only exception to this is that lines carrying a left arrow may
only be traversed right to left. In the diagrams, keywords are
written in capital letters; in practice an SRL compiler must be
insensitive to case. Lower-case identifiers are explained in the
text, or they refer to another diagram.
The tokens of an SRL program obey the following rules:
- Comments may appear on any line of an SRL program, following a #
- White space is used to separate tokens
- Semicolon is used as the terminator for most statements
- Identifiers (e.g. for defines and labels) must start with a letter
- Identifiers may contain letters, digits and underscores
- The case of letters is not significant
- Reserved words (shown in upper case in this document) may not be
used as identifiers
2.1 Define Directive
--- DEFINE -- defname ---- = ---- defined_text ------------------ ;
Simple parameterless defines are supported via the syntax above. The
define name, defname, is an identifier. The defined text starts
after the equal sign, and continues up to (but not including) the
Brownlee Informational [Page 4]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
closing semicolon. If a semicolon is required within the defined
text it must be preceded by a backslash, i.e. \; in an SRL define
produces ; in the text.
Wherever defname appears elsewhere in the program, it will be
replaced by the defined text.
For example,
DEFINE ftp = (20, 21); # Well-known Port numbers from [ASG-NBR]
DEFINE telnet = 23;
DEFINE www = 80;
2.2 Program
------------+-------+-------- Statement -------+-------+-----------
| | | |
| +------- Declaration ------+ |
| |
+---------------------<--------------------+
An SRL program is a sequence of statements or declarations. It does
not have any special enclosing symbols. Statements and declarations
terminate with a semicolon, except for compound statements, which
terminate with a right brace.
2.3 Declaration
---------------------- Subroutine_declaration ---------------------
SRL's only explicit declaration is the subroutine declaration. Other
implicit declarations are labels (declared where they appear in front
of a statement) and subroutine parameters (declared in the subroutine
header).
3 Statement
----------------+---- IF_statement ----------------+---------------
| |
+---- Compound_statement ----------+
| |
+---- Imperative_statement --------+
| |
+---- CALL_statement --------------+
An SRL program is a sequence of SRL statements. There are four kinds
of statements, as follows.
Brownlee Informational [Page 5]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
3.1 IF_statement
Test Part Action Part
............. ...............
--- IF --- expression ---+------------+---- Statement ----+--->
| | |
+-- SAVE , --+ |
| |
+-- SAVE ; ----------------------+
>-----------+-----------------------------+-----------------
| |
+-----ELSE --- Statement -----+
3.1.1 expression
-------- term --------+------------------------+-------------------
| |
+--<-- term ----- || ----+ logical OR
3.1.2 term
------- factor -------+------------------------+-------------------
| |
+--<-- factor --- && ----+ logical AND
3.1.3 factor
------------+-------- attrib == operand_list --------+-----------
| |
+------------ ( expression ) --------------+
3.1.4 operand_list
----------+------------------ operand -----------------+-----------
| |
+-- ( operand ---+-------------------+-- ) --+
| |
+-<-- operand , ---+
3.1.5 operand
------------- value ---------+----------------------+--------------
| |
+------- / width ------+
| |
+------- & mask -------+
Brownlee Informational [Page 6]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
3.1.6 Test Part
The IF statement evaluates a logical expression. If the expression
value is TRUE, the action indicated in the 'Action Part' of the
diagram is executed. If the value is FALSE and the IF has an ELSE
clause, that ELSE clause is executed (see below).
The simplest form of expression is a test for equality (== operator);
in this an RTFM attribute value (from the packet or from an SRL
variable) is ANDed with a mask and compared with a value. A list of
RTFM attributes is given in Appendix C. More complicated expressions
may be built up using parentheses and the && (logical AND) and ||
(logical OR) operators.
Operand values may be specified as dotted decimal, hexadecimal or as
a character constant (enclosed in apostrophes). The syntax for
operand values is given in Appendix B.
Masks may be specified as numbers,
dotted decimal e.g. &255.255
or hexadecimal e.g. &FF-FF
or as a width in bits e.g. /16
If a mask is not specified, an all-ones mask is used.
In SRL a value is always combined with a mask; this combination is
referred to as an operand. For example, if we were interested in
flows originating from IP network 130.216, we might write:
IF SourcePeerAddress == 130.216.0.0 & 255.255.0.0 SAVE;
or equivalently
IF SourcePeerAddress == 130.216/16 SAVE;
A list of values enclosed in parentheses may also be specified; the
test succeeds if the masked attribute equals any of the values in the
list. For example:
IF SourcePeerAddress == ( 130.216.7/24, 130.216.34/24 ) SAVE;
As this last example indicates, values are right-padded with zeroes,
i.e. the given numbers specify the leading bytes of masks and values.
The operand values and masks used in an IF statement must be
consistent with the attribute being tested. For example, a four-byte
value is acceptable as a peer address, but would not be accepted as a
transport address (which may not be longer than two bytes).
Brownlee Informational [Page 7]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
3.1.7 Action Part
A SAVE action (i.e. SAVE , or SAVE ;) saves attribute(s), mask(s) and
value(s) as given in the statement. If the IF expression tests more
than one attribute, the masks and values are saved for all the
matched attributes. For each value_list in the statement the value
saved is the one which the packet actually matched. See below for
further description of SAVE statements.
Other actions are described in detail under "Imperative statements"
below. Note that the RETURN action is valid only within subroutines.
3.1.8 ELSE Clause
An ELSE Clause provides a statement which will be executed if the
IF's test fails. The statement following ELSE will often be another
IF statement, providing SRL's version of a 'select' statement. Note
that an ELSE clause always matches the immediately preceding IF.
3.2 Compound_statement
-------+-------------+----- { ---+---- Statement ----+--- } -------
| | | |
+-- label : --+ +--------<----------+
A compound statement is a sequence of statements enclosed in braces.
Each statement will terminate with a semicolon, unless it is another
compound statement (which terminates with a right brace).
A compound statement may be labelled, i.e. preceded by an identifier
followed by a semi-colon. Each statement inside the braces is
executed in sequence unless an EXIT statement is performed, as
explained below.
Labels have a well-defined scope, within which they must be unique.
Labels within a subroutine (i.e. between a SUBROUTINE and its
matching ENDSUB) are local to that subroutine and are not visible
outside it. Labels outside subroutines are part of a program's outer
block.
Brownlee Informational [Page 8]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
3.3 Imperative_statement
------+---------------------------------------------------+------ ;
| |
+-- SAVE attrib --+--+-----------+--+---------------+
| | | | | |
| | +- / width -+ | |
| | | | | |
| | +- & mask --+ | |
| | | |
| +--- = operand ---+ |
| |
+-- COUNT ------------------------------------------+
| |
+-- EXIT label ------------------------------------+
| |
+-- IGNORE -----------------------------------------+
| |
+-- NOMATCH ----------------------------------------+
| |
+-- RETURN --+-------+------------------------------+
| | | |
| +-- n --+ |
| |
+-- STORE variable := value ------------------------+
3.3.1 SAVE Statement
The SAVE statement saves information which will (later) identify the
flow in the meter's flow table. It does not actually record anything
in the table; this is done when a subsequent COUNT statement
executes.
SAVE has two possible forms:
SAVE attrib = operand ; saves the attribute, mask and value as given
in the statement. This form of the SAVE statement is similar to
that allowed in an IF statement, except that - since imperative
statements do not perform a test - you may save an arbitrary
value.
SAVE attrib ;
SAVE attrib / width ;
SAVE attrib & mask ; saves the attribute and mask from the statement,
and the value resulting from their application to the current
packet. This is most useful when used to save a value with a
wider mask than than was used to select the packet. For
example:
Brownlee Informational [Page 9]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
IF DestPeerAddress == 130.216/16
NOMATCH;
ELSE IF SourcePeerAddress == 130.216/16 {
SAVE SourcePeerAddress /24;
COUNT;
}
ELSE IGNORE;
3.3.2 COUNT Statement
The COUNT statement appears after all testing and saving is complete;
it instructs the PME to build the flow identifier from the attributes
which have been SAVEd, find it in the meter's flow table (creating a
new entry if this is the first packet observed for the flow), and
increment its counters. The meter then moves on to examine the next
incoming packet.
3.3.3 EXIT Statement
The EXIT statement exits a labelled compound statement. The next
statement to be executed will be the one following that compound
statement. This provides a well-defined way to jump to a clearly
identified point in a program. For example:
outer: {
...
if SourcePeerAddress == 192.168/16
exit outer; # exits the statement labelled 'outer'
...
}
# execution resumes here
In practice the language provides sufficient logical structure that
one seldom - if ever - needs to use the EXIT statement.
3.3.4 IGNORE Statement
The IGNORE statement terminates examination of the current packet
without saving any information from it. The meter then moves on to
examine the next incoming packet, beginning again at the first
statement of its program.
3.3.5 NOMATCH Statement
The NOMATCH statement indicates that matching has failed for this
execution of the program. If it is executed when a packet is being
processed with its addresses in 'on the wire' order, the PME will
Brownlee Informational [Page 10]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
perform the program again from the beginning with source and
destination addresses interchanged. If it is executed following such
an interchange, the packet will be IGNOREd.
NOMATCH is illustrated in the SAVE example (section 3.3.1), where it
is used to ensure that flows having 130.216/16 as an end-point are
counted as though 130.216 had been those flows' source peer (IP)
address.
3.3.6 STORE Statement
The STORE statement assigns a value to an SRL variable and SAVEs it.
There are six SRL variables:
SourceClass SourceKind
DestClass DestKind
FlowClass FlowKind
Their names have no particular significance; they were arbitrarily
chosen as likely RTFM attributes but can be used to store any
single-byte integer values. Their values are set to zero each time
examination of a new packet begins. For example:
STORE SourceClass := 3;
STORE FlowKind := 'W'
3.3.7 RETURN Statement
The RETURN statement is used to return from subroutines and can be
used only within the context of a subroutine. It is described in
detail below (CALL statement).
3.4 Subroutine_declaration
-- SUBROUTINE subname ( --+-----------------------------+-- ) -->
| |
+--+-- ADDRESS --- pname --+--+
| |
+-- VARIABLE -- pname --+
| |
+------<------- , ------+
>------+-------- Statement ---------+----- ENDSUB -------- ;
| |
+-------------<--------------+
Brownlee Informational [Page 11]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
A Subroutine declaration has three parts:
the subname is an identifier, used to name the subroutine.
the parameter list specifies the subroutine's parameters. Each
parameter is preceded with a keyword indicating its type -
VARIABLE indicates an SRL variable (see the STORE statement
above), ADDRESS indicates any other RTFM attribute. A
parameter name may be any identifier, and its scope is limited
to the subroutine's body.
the body specifies what processing the subroutine will perform.
This is simply a sequence of Statements, terminated by the
ENDSUB keyword.
Note that EXITs in a subroutine may not refer to labels outside it.
The only way to leave a subroutine is via a RETURN statement.
3.5 CALL_statement
---- CALL subname ( --+---------------------+-- ) ---->
| |
+--+-- parameter --+--+
| |
+----<--- , ----+
>---+-------------------------------------+--- ENDCALL ---- ;
| |
+---+--+-- n : --+--- Statement --+---+
| | | |
| +----<----+ |
| |
+--------------<--------------+
The CALL statement invokes an SRL subroutine. The parameters are SRL
variables or other RTFM attributes, and their types must match those
in the subroutine declaration. Following the parameters is a
sequence of statements, each preceded by an integer label. These
labels will normally be 1:, 2:, 3:, etc, but they do not have to be
contiguous, nor in any particular order. They are referred to in
RETURN statements within the subroutine body.
e.g. RETURN 2; would return to the statement labelled 2:
within in the CALL statement.
Execution of the labelled statement completes the CALL.
Brownlee Informational [Page 12]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
If the return statement does not specify a return label, the first
statement executed after RETURN will be the statement immediately
following ENDCALL.
4 Example Programs
4.1 Classify IP Port Numbers
#
# Classify IP port numbers
#
define IPv4 = 1; # Address Family number from [ASG-NBR]
#
define ftp = (20, 21); # Well-Known Port numbers from [ASG-NBR]
define telnet = 23;
define www = 80;
#
define tcp = 6; # Protocol numbers from [ASG-NBR]
define udp = 17;
#
if SourcePeerType == IPv4 save;
else ignore; # Not an IPv4 packet
#
if (SourceTransType == tcp || SourceTransType == udp) save, {
if SourceTransAddress == (www, ftp, telnet) nomatch;
# We want the well-known port as Dest
#
if DestTransAddress == telnet
save, store FlowKind := 'T';
else if DestTransAddress == www
save, store FlowKind := 'W';
else if DestTransAddress == ftp
save, store FlowKind := 'F';
else {
save DestTransAddress;
store FlowKind := '?';
}
}
else save SourceTransType = 0;
#
save SourcePeerAddress /32;
save DestPeerAddress /32;
count;
#
Brownlee Informational [Page 13]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
This program counts only IP packets, saving SourceTransType (tcp, udp
or 0), Source- and DestPeerAddress (32-bit IP addresses) and FlowKind
('W' for www, 'F' for ftp, 'T' for telnet, '?' for unclassified).
The program uses a NOMATCH action to specify the packet direction -
its resulting flows will have the well-known ports as their
destination.
4.2 Classify Traffic into Groups of Networks
#
# SRL program to classify traffic into network groups
#
define my_net = 130.216/16;
define k_nets = ( 130.217/16, 130.123/16, 130.195/16,
132.181/16, 138.75/16, 139.80/16 );
#
call net_kind (SourcePeerAddress, SourceKind)
endcall;
call net_kind (DestPeerAddress, DestKind)
endcall;
count;
#
subroutine net_kind (address addr, variable net)
if addr == my_net save, {
store net := 10; return 1;
}
else if addr == k_nets save, {
store net := 20; return 2;
}
save addr/24; # Not my_net or in k_nets
store net := 30; return 3;
endsub;
#
The net_kind subroutine determines whether addr is my network
(130.216), one of the Kawaihiko networks (in the k_nets list), or
some other network. It saves the network address from addr (16 bits
for my_net and the k_net networks, 24 bits for others), stores a
value of 10, 20 or 30 in net, and returns to 1:, 2: or 3:. Note
that the network numbers used are contained within the two DEFINEs,
making them easy to change.
net_kind is called twice, saving Source- and DestPeerAddress and
Source- and DestKind; the COUNT statement produces flows identified
by these four RTFM attributes, with no particular source-dest
ordering.
Brownlee Informational [Page 14]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
In the program no use is made of return numbers and they could have
been omitted. However, we might wish to re-use the subroutine in
another program doing different things for different return numbers,
as in the version below.
call net_kind (DestPeerAddress, DestKind)
1: nomatch; # We want my_net as source
endcall;
call net_kind (SourcePeerAddress, SourceKind)
1: count; # my_net -> other networks
endcall;
save SourcePeerAddress /24;
save DestPeerAddress /24;
count;
This version uses a NOMATCH statement to ensure that its resulting
flows have my_net as their source. The NOMATCH also rejects my_net
-> my_net traffic. Traffic which doesn't have my_net as source or
destination saves 24 bits of its peer addresses (the subroutine might
only have saved 16) before counting such an unusual flow.
5 Security Considerations
SRL is a language for creating rulesets (i.e. configuration files)
for RTFM Traffic Meters - it does not present any security issues in
itself.
On the other hand, flow data gathered using such rulesets may well be
valuable. It is therefore important to take proper precautions to
ensure that access to the meter and its data is secure. Ways to
achieve this are discussed in detail in the Architecture and Meter
MIB documents [RTFM-ARC, RTFM-MIB].
6 IANA Considerations
Appendix C below lists the RTFM attributes by name. Since SRL only
refers to attributes by name, SRL users do not have to know the
attribute numbers.
The size (in bytes) of the various attribute values is also listed in
Appendix C. These sizes reflect the object sizes for the attribute
values as they are stored in the RTFM Meter MIB [RTFM-MIB].
IANA considerations for allocating new attributes are discussed in
detail in the RTFM Architecture document [RTFM-ARC].
Brownlee Informational [Page 15]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
7 APPENDICES
7.1 Appendix A: SRL Syntax in BNF
<SRL program> ::= <S or D> | <SRL program> <S or D>
<S or D> ::= <statement> | <declaration>
<declaration> ::= <Subroutine declaration>
<statement> ::= <IF statement> |
<Compound statement> |
<Imperative statement> |
<CALL statement>
<IF statement> ::= IF <expression> <if action> <opt else>
<if action> ::= SAVE ; |
SAVE , <statement> |
<statement>
<opt else> ::= <null> |
ELSE <statement>
<expression> ::= <term> | <term> || <term>
<term> ::= <factor> | <factor> && <factor>
<factor> ::= <attribute> == <operand list> |
( <expression> )
<operand list> ::= <operand> | ( <actual operand list> )
<actual operand list> ::= <operand> |
<actual operand list> , <operand>
<operand> ::= <value> |
<value> / <width> |
<value> & <mask>
<Compound statement> ::= <opt label> { <statement seq> }
<opt label> ::= <null> |
<identifier> :
<statement seq> ::= <statement> | <statement seq> <statement>
<Imperative statement> ::= ; |
Brownlee Informational [Page 16]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
SAVE <attribute> <opt operand> ; |
COUNT ; |
EXIT <label> ; |
IGNORE ; |
NOMATCH ; |
RETURN <integer> ; |
RETURN ; |
STORE <variable> := <value> ;
<opt operand> ::= <null> |
<width or mask> |
= <operand>
<width or mask> ::= / <width> | & <mask>
<Subroutine declaration> ::=
SUBROUTINE <sub header> <sub body> ENDSUB ;
<sub header> ::= <subname> ( ) |
<subname> ( <sub param list> )
<sub param list> ::= <sub param> | <sub param list> , <sub param>
<sub param> ::= ADDRESS <pname> | VARIABLE <pname>
<pname> ::= <identifier>
<sub body> ::= <statement sequence>
<CALL statement> ::= CALL <call header> <opt call body> ENDCALL ;
<call header> ::= <subname> ( ) |
<subname> ( <call param list> )
<call param list> ::= <call param> |
<call param list> , <call param>
<call param> ::= <attribute> | <variable>
<opt call body> ::= <null> |
<actual call body>
<actual call body> ::= <numbered statement> |
<actual call body> <numbered statement>
<numbered statement> ::= <int label seq> <statement>
<int label seq> ::= <integer> : | <int label seq> <integer> :
Brownlee Informational [Page 17]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
The following are terminals, recognised by the scanner:
<identifier> Described in section 2
<integer> A decimal integer
<attribute> Attribute name, as listed in Appendix C
<value>, <mask> Described in section 5.2
<width> ::= <integer>
<label> ::= <identifier>
<variable> ::= SourceClass | DestClass | FlowClass |
SourceKind | DestKind | FlowKind
7.2 Appendix B: Syntax for Values and Masks
Values and masks consist of sequences of numeric fields, each of one
or more bytes. The non-blank character following a field indicates
the field width, and whether the number is decimal or hexadecimal.
These 'field type' characters may be:
. period decimal, single byte
- minus hex, single byte
! exclaim decimal, two bytes
For example, 130.216.0.0 is an IP address (in dotted decimal), and
FF-FF-00-00 is an IP address in hexadecimal.
The last field of a value or mask has no field width character.
Instead it takes the same width as the preceding field. For example,
1.3.10!50 and 1.3.0.10.0.50 are two different ways to specify the
same value.
Unspecified fields (at the right-hand side of a value or mask) are
set to zero, i.e. 130.216 is the same as 130.216.0.0.
If only a single field is specified (no field width character), the
value given fills the whole field. For example, 23 and 0.23 specify
the same value for a SourceTransAddress operand. For variables
(which have one-byte values) a C-style character constant may also be
used.
IPv6 addresses and masks may also be used, following the conventions
set out in the IP Version 6 Addressing Architecture RFC [V6-ADR].
Brownlee Informational [Page 18]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
7.3 Appendix C: RTFM Attribute Information
The following attributes may be tested in an IF statement, and their
values may be SAVEd (except for MatchingStoD). Their maximum size (in
bytes) is shown to the left, and a brief description is given for
each. The names given here are reserved words in SRL (they are
<attribute> terminals in the grammar given in Appendix A).
Note that this table gives only a very brief summary. The Meter MIB
[RTFM-MIB] provides the definitive specification of attributes and
their allowed values. The MIB variables which represent flow
attributes have 'flowData' prepended to their names to indicate that
they belong to the MIB's flowData table.
1 SourceInterface, DestInterface
Interface(s) on which the flow was observed
1 SourceAdjacentType, DestAdjacentType
Indicates the interface type(s), i.e. an ifType from [ASG-NBR],
or an Address Family Number (if metering within a tunnel)
0 SourceAdjacentAddress, DestAdjacentAddress
For IEEE 802.x interfaces, the MAC addresses for the flow
1 SourcePeerType, DestPeerType
Peer protocol types, i.e. Address Family Number from [ASG-NBR],
such as IPv4, Novell, Ethertalk, ..
0 SourcePeerAddress, DestPeerAddress
Peer Addresses (size varies, e.g. 4 for IPv4, 3 for Ethertalk))
1 SourceTransType, DestTransType
Transport layer type, i.e. Protocol Number from [ASG-NBR]
such as tcp(6), udp(17), ospf(89), ..
2 SourceTransAddress, DestTransAddress
Transport layer addresses (e.g. port numbers for TCP and UDP)
1 FlowRuleset
Rule set number for the flow
1 MatchingStoD
Indicates whether the packet is being matched with its
addresses in 'wire order.' See [RTFM-ARC] for details.
The following variables may be tested in an IF, and their values may
be set by a STORE. They all have one-byte values.
Brownlee Informational [Page 19]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
SourceClass, DestClass, FlowClass,
SourceKind, DestKind, FlowKind
The following RTFM attributes are not address attributes - they are
measured attributes of a flow. Their values may be read from an RTFM
meter. (For example, NeTraMet uses a FORMAT statement to specify
which attribute values are to be read from the meter.)
8 ToOctets, FromOctets
Total number of octets seen for each direction of the flow
8 ToPDUs, FromPDUs
Total number of PDUs seen for each direction of the flow
4 FirstTime, LastActiveTime
Time (in centiseconds) that first and last PDUs were seen
for the flow
Other attributes will be defined by the RTFM working group from time
to time.
8 Acknowledgments
The SRL language is part of the RTFM Working Group's efforts to make
the RTFM traffic measurement system easier to use. Initial work on
the language was done by Cyndi Mills and Brad Frazee in Boston. SRL
was developed in Auckland; it was greatly assisted by detailed
discussion with John White and Russell Fulton. Discussion has
continued on the RTFM and NeTraMet mailing lists.
9 References
[ASG-NBR] Reynolds, J. and J. Postel, "Assigned Numbers",
STD 2, RFC 1700, October 1994.
[NETRAMET] Brownlee, N., NeTraMet home page,
http://www.auckland.ac.nz/net/NeTraMet
[RTFM-ARC] Brownlee, N., Mills, C. and G. Ruth, "Traffic Flow
Measurement: Architecture", RFC 2722, October 1999.
[RTFM-MIB] Brownlee, N., "Traffic Flow Measurement: Meter MIB",
RFC 2720, October 1999.
[V6-ADDR] Hinden, R. and S. Deering, "IP Version 6 Addressing
Architecture," RFC 2373, July 1998.
Brownlee Informational [Page 20]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
10 Author's Address
Nevil Brownlee
Information Technology Systems & Services
The University of Auckland
Private Bag 92-019
Auckland, New Zealand
Phone: +64 9 373 7599 x8941
EMail: n.brownlee@auckland.ac.nz
Brownlee Informational [Page 21]
RFC 2723 SRL: A Traffic Flow Language October 1999
11 Full Copyright Statement
Copyright (C) The Internet Society (1999). All Rights Reserved.
This document and translations of it may be copied and furnished to
others, and derivative works that comment on or otherwise explain it
or assist in its implementation may be prepared, copied, published
and distributed, in whole or in part, without restriction of any
kind, provided that the above copyright notice and this paragraph are
included on all such copies and derivative works. However, this
document itself may not be modified in any way, such as by removing
the copyright notice or references to the Internet Society or other
Internet organizations, except as needed for the purpose of
developing Internet standards in which case the procedures for
copyrights defined in the Internet Standards process must be
followed, or as required to translate it into languages other than
English.
The limited permissions granted above are perpetual and will not be
revoked by the Internet Society or its successors or assigns.
This document and the information contained herein is provided on an
"AS IS" basis and THE INTERNET SOCIETY AND THE INTERNET ENGINEERING
TASK FORCE DISCLAIMS ALL WARRANTIES, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, INCLUDING
BUT NOT LIMITED TO ANY WARRANTY THAT THE USE OF THE INFORMATION
HEREIN WILL NOT INFRINGE ANY RIGHTS OR ANY IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF
MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
Acknowledgement
Funding for the RFC Editor function is currently provided by the
Internet Society.
Brownlee Informational [Page 22]