💾 Archived View for gemi.dev › gemini-mailing-list › 001067.gmi captured on 2024-05-12 at 16:22:38. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-12-28)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

RE: RE: Rethinking the link line

1. The Gnuserland (gnuserland (a) mailbox.org)


OH my... ^_____^"

As I stated, I arrived late here , I missed a lot of important conversations.
I wrote because I'd like to contribute and I laughed to your sarcasm 
however never pretended to be right, I just asked.
Cheers,
TGL
> It was thus said that the Great The Gnuserland once stated:
>> Today the specs define:
>> 
>> =>
>> 
>> to provide links for every protocols your client and the capsule server
>> can handle, if for instance you client is able to handle some of the
>> content delivered it will be likely to be display in a line.
>> 
>> I suggest to also to add a second flavor:
>> 
>> <=
>    Today you are proposing to define '<='.  Yesterday, there was a proposal
> to define '<=' for inputing of form data:
> 
> gemini://gemi.dev/gemini-mailing-list/messages/004944.gmi
> 
>      Today you are proposing to define '<='.  Yesterday, there was a proposal
> to define '<=' for inputing of form data:
> 
> gemini://gemi.dev/gemini-mailing-list/messages/004944.gmi
> 
>    Tomarrow?  Who knows?  Expect more bikeshedding.
> 
>    -spc

Link to individual message.

---

Previous Thread: Rethinking the link line

Next Thread: [users] Gemini "Server of the Day" & database