๐พ Archived View for scholasticdiversity.us.to โบ scriptures โบ jewish โบ t โบ Rashi%20on%20Leviticus%206โฆ captured on 2024-05-10 at 13:46:27. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
7 โ[1] ืืืืช ืชืืจืช ืืื ืื AND THIS IS THE LAW OF THE MEAL OFFERING โ one law for all meal-offerings (cf. Rashi on v. 2) โ making requisite for them โoilโ and โfrankincenseโ which are prescribed in the previous section (Leviticus 2:1). This had to be intimated in some way here because I might think that there I have the law that meal offerings require oil and frankincense only if they belong to an ordinary Israelite since it is that alone of which a fistful (ืงืืืฅ) had to be taken, (for the command to take the ืงืืืฅ is preceded by the words ืืืฆืง ืขืืื ืฉืื ืื ืชื ืขืืื ืืืื ื cf. Leviticus 2:1 and 2)! Whence can I know that the same applies to the meal-offering of priests which was entirely burnt (and of which therefore no ืงืืืฅ was taken; cf. Rashi on v. 15)? Because Scripture states, ืชืืจืช โ โthis is the general law of the meal-offeringโ (Sifra, Tzav, Section 2 3).
โ[2] ืืงืจื ืืชื [AARON AND HIS SONS SHALL] BRING IT โ This means bringing near (not offering, i. e. burning, for this is mentioned later in v. 8) to the south-west corner of the altar.
โ[3] ืืคื ื ืืณ BEFORE THE LORD โ This is the west side of the altar which faced the direction of the โtent of meetingโ in which the Lord revealed himself.
โ[4] ืื ืคื ื ืืืืื โ This again implies the south side of the altar, because that was the โโโ ืื ืคื ื ืืืืื, the front of the altar, since the ascent leading up to it was situated on that side (the combination therefore of both locations:'ืืคื ื ื and ืื ืคื ื ืืืืื describes the south-west corner of the altar, as stated above) (Sotah 14b; Sifra, Tzav, Section 2 4).
Version: Pentateuch with Rashi's commentary by M. Rosenbaum and A.M. Silbermann, 1929-1934
Source: https://www.nli.org.il/he/books/NNL_ALEPH001969084
License: Public Domain