๐Ÿ’พ Archived View for scholasticdiversity.us.to โ€บ scriptures โ€บ jewish โ€บ t โ€บ Or%20HaChaim%20on%20Levitiโ€ฆ captured on 2024-05-10 at 13:19:21. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Or HaChaim on Leviticus 13:44

Home

Torah

44 โ€Ž[1] ** ืฆืจื•ืข ื”ื•ื ื˜ืžื ื”ื•ื, he is "leprous," he is ritually impure.** It appears best to approach these words in the same way Hillel approached the words ื˜ื”ื•ืจ ื”ื•ื ื•ื˜ื”ืจื• ื”ื›ื”ืŸ in verse 37. Here the force of the exegesis is even more convincing as the word ืฆืจื•ืข refers to the body of the afflicted person whereas we still require that the priest declare him to be ritually impure. This means that legally speaking, his symptoms notwithstanding, the afflicted person would not be considered subject to the laws of impurity until the priest had declared him to be impure.

โ€Ž[2] The reason the Torah repeated ื˜ืžื ื”ื•ื is to make it clear that if the priest had erred and had declared a person as ritually impure although his symptoms did not justify this, the priest's declaration is invalid. The reason the Torah also repeated ื˜ืžื ื™ื˜ืžืื ื• is explained in *Torat Kohanim* as including all other categories of ritual impurity. A person never becomes legally impure due to symptoms on his skin unless the priest has declared him to be so.

โ€Ž[3] **ืฆืจื•ืข ื”ื•ื, he is "leprous."** Why does the Torah not use the expression ืฆืจืขืช ื”ื•ื in order to describe the affliction as it has done repeatedly? Perhaps the Torah wanted to indicate G'd's extreme displeasure with a person whom He has afflicted with this disease in such exposed areas of the skin of the head and beard. Most other afflictions listed in our portion occur in more private parts of the body. Generally speaking, G'd displays great concern for the sensitivities of a person even when He punishes him. The person described here as ืฆืจื•ืข has forfeited the consideration G'd normally shows even to sinners; this is why he is described as a "leper" throughout. The words ื‘ืจืืฉื• ื ื’ืขื• that his affliction is already in his head, is the justification for calling him a ืฆืจื•ืข.

Previous

Next

Version Info

Version: Or Hachayim, trans. Eliyahu Munk

Source: http://www.urimpublications.com/or-hachayim-commentary-on-the-torah-5-vols.html

License: CC-BY

Jewish Texts

Powered by Sefaria.org