💾 Archived View for sdf.org › mmeta4 › Phlog › phlog-2019-03-08.txt captured on 2024-05-10 at 11:30:08.

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-03)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

March 08 2019
Just some randomness while I finish reading 'The Uninhabitable Earth',
David Wallace-Wells recent book, an expansion on his 2017 New York
Magazine article [1].  Quite an engaging read so far.  Alex Smith of
EcoShock radio interviewed Wallace-Wells [2] recently.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Uninhabitable_Earth
[2] https://www.ecoshock.org/2019/02/uninhabitable-earth-david-wallace-wells.html

 - -

Meet Vaclav Smil - by Paul Voosen / Science Magazine - March 21, 2018
https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2018/03/meet-vaclav-smil-man-who-has-quietly-shaped-how-world-thinks-about-energy

I've read some of Smil's work [1] and while he is clearly a very bright
guy he is SO dry, one has to wonder why Bill Gates is such a huge fan.
Thinking on it more, I've concluded its the lack of conclusions; Smil
generates tons of data but rarely seems to take the next step of tying
it together into something larger.  Data of course is exactly what
proponents of all things techno-wondrous want -- feed that data in 
without preconceptions and see what comes out the other end.  Nothing
too terrible about that I suppose, though it's hard to imagine positive
predictions; Smil's work tends to lend support to many of the more
pessimistic forecasts for the planet and of course the current global
industrial civilization.  The more conspiracy minded might even wonder
just what the Gate Foundation is up to in Africa [2], a continent that
will almost certainly be one of the first to collapse due to fallout
from over-population and global warming.

[1] http://energyskeptic.com/category/expert-biophysical/vaclav-smil/
[2] https://www.umhs-sk.org/blog/why-bill-melinda-gates-foundation-has-so-many-public-health-critics/

 - -

As the World Burns - by Paul Street / Counterpunch - March 8, 2019
https://www.paulstreet.org/as-the-world-burns-hurtling-towards-an-unlivable-planet/

First time I've encountered the phrase "Capitalogenic Global Warming".
I think Street's article captures the zeitgeist of these pivoting times,
at least within the US, where we basically have an ad profits-driven media
continuously distracting the populace while corrupt career politicians
funnel the vast majority of what wealth that can still be squeezed out
of our energy-fueled growth machine to the elites.  Meanwhile the storm
clouds gather as we edge towards and beyond various environmental tipping
points into a not-so-bright, no-app-for-that [1] future.

[1] http://noapp4that.org/

 - -

The Worlds We Live In - by John Michael Greer / Ecosophia - March 6, 2019
https://www.ecosophia.net/the-worlds-we-live-in/

An interesting essay only indirectly relating to our global predicaments,
mainly enlightening (to me anyway) in that Mr. Greer reveals a bit
about himself, namely that he's a Huxley College of the Environment [1]
graduate, and apparently has Asperger syndrome [2]. Perhaps if I was a
more regular reader of Greer's various blogs over the years I would have
known this.  I was definitely curious as to what his formal background
was; other than references to being involved with the Appropriate
Technology [3] movement in the 1970s and of course all things Druid,
I don't recall much else mentioned in the "about the author" sections
of his various books.  As for the Asperger's, it perhaps explains some
of the preachy shrillness he occasionally exudes.  Power to him though;
Asperger's has certainly not held him back and quite possibly afforded
him some unique points of view of this world we live in.

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Huxley_College_of_the_Environment
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Appropriate_technology

 - -



The Green (New) Deal is Hopium - by Time Warkins / Consciousness of Sheep - March 6, 2019
http://consciousnessofsheep.co.uk/2019/03/06/the-green-deal-is-hopium/

Warkin's essay is one of the most concise parsing I've read of the
magical thinking that so dominates so-called Western progressive
thought when it comes to attempts to fit climate change mitigation
into the Growth and Progress paradigm.  A particularly succinct
observation:

   When we think about an energy revolution, we think only
   about swapping out the electricity that is currently
   generated using fossil carbon fuels.  Even then, we treat
   the alternatives as if they are conjured into existence
   with no impact on the planet when, in fact, they are the
   product of fossil fuels -- they are not "renewables" in
   the sense of something that can be infinitely renewed;
   merely non-renewable technologies that happen to harvest
   renewable (for all practical purposes) flows of energy.

I do take some issue with Warkin's black and white assessment of
our predicament:

 - In order to prevent environmental collapse bringing about
 the death of more than six in every seven humans on the
 planet, we (all of us) simply have to stop using fossil
 carbon fuels today.

 - But if we stop using the fossil carbon fuels that
 currently provide the world with 85 percent of its power,
 our highly complex and interconnected oil-dependent economy
 will crash; resulting in a global famine that will kill
 more than six in every seven humans on the planet anyway.

Though most assume that a steady draw-down of human population looks
devastating, there are proposals[1,2] that are fairly humane and
manageable.  Keeping our existing nuclear power plants online could
help soften to blow; building out rail systems and recycling cars
may also help ease the pain of the economic contraction.  Reintegrating
humans and other animals to food production would too.  To me, the
biggest obstacle is getting the world to abandon allegiance to the
religion of Growth and Progress.

[1] https://www.worldpopulationbalance.org/our-vision-solve-overpopulation
[2] http://www.skil.org/position_papers_folder/100timestoomany.html