💾 Archived View for gmi.runtimeterror.dev › vra8-custom-provisioning-part-one › index.gmi captured on 2024-05-10 at 10:57:05. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
2021-03-29
I recently shared some details about my little self-contained VMware homelab [1] as well as how I integrated {php}IPAM into vRealize Automation 8 for assigning IPs to deployed VMs [2]. For my next trick, I'll be crafting a flexible Cloud Template and accompanying vRealize Orchestrator workflow that will help to deploy and configure virtual machines based on a vRA user's input. Buckle up, this is going to be A Ride.
[1] some details about my little self-contained VMware homelab
[2] integrated {php}IPAM into vRealize Automation 8 for assigning IPs to deployed VMs
Before getting into the *how* it would be good to start with the *what* - what exactly are we hoping to accomplish here? For my use case, I'll need a solution which can:
Looking back, that's kind of a lot. I can see why I've been working on this for months!
In production, I'll want to be able to deploy to different computer clusters spanning multiple vCenters. That's a bit difficult to do on a single physical server, but I still wanted to be able to simulate that sort of dynamic resource selection. So for development and testing in my lab, I'll be using two sites - `BOW` and `DRE`. I ditched the complicated "just because I can" vSAN I'd built previously and instead spun up two single-host nested clusters, one for each of my sites:
Image: vCenter showing the BOW and DRE clusters
Those hosts have one virtual NIC each on a standard switch connected to my home network, and a second NIC each connected to the "isolated" internal lab network [3] with all the VLANs for the guests to run on:
Image: dvSwitch showing attached hosts and dvPortGroups
[3] "isolated" internal lab network
On the vRA side of things, I logged in to the Cloud Assembly portion and went to the Infrastructure tab. I first created a Project named `LAB`, added the vCenter as a Cloud Account, and then created a Cloud Zone for the vCenter as well. On the Compute tab of the Cloud Zone properties, I manually added both the `BOW` and `DRE` clusters.
Image: BOW and DRE Clusters added to Cloud Zone
I also created a Network Profile and added each of the nested dvPortGroups I had created for this purpose.
Image: Network Profile with added vSphere networks
Each network also gets associated with the related IP Range which was imported from {php}IPAM [4].
Image: IP Range bound to a network
Since each of my hosts only has 100GB of datastore and my Windows template specifies a 60GB VMDK, I went ahead and created a Storage Profile so that deployments would default to being Thin Provisioned.
Image: Thin-provision storage profile
I created a few Flavor Mappings ranging from `micro` (1vCPU|1GB RAM) to `giant` (8vCPU|16GB) but for this resource-constrained lab I'll stick mostly to the `micro`, `tiny` (1vCPU|2GB), and `small` (2vCPU|2GB) sizes.
Image: T-shirt size Flavor Mappings
And I created an Image Mapping named `ws2019` which points to a Windows Server 2019 Core template I have stored in my lab's Content Library (cleverly-named "LABrary" for my own amusement).
Image: Windows Server Image Mapping
And with that, my vRA infrastructure is ready for testing a *very* basic deployment.
Now it's time to leave the Infrastructure tab and visit the Design one, where I'll create a new Cloud Template (what previous versions of vRA called "Blueprints"). I start by dragging one each of the **vSphere > Machine** and **vSphere > Network** entities onto the workspace. I then pop over to the Code tab on the right to throw together some simple YAML statements:
Image: My first Cloud Template!
VMware's got a pretty great document [5] describing the syntax for these input properties, plus a lot of it is kind of self-explanatory. Let's step through this real quick:
formatVersion: 1
inputs:
# Image Mapping
image:
type: string
title: Operating System
oneOf:
- title: Windows Server 2019
const: ws2019
default: ws2019
`formatVersion` is always gonna be 1 so we'll skip right past that.
The first input is going to ask the user to select the desired Operating System for this deployment. The `oneOf` type will be presented as a dropdown (with only one option in this case, but I'll leave it this way for future flexibility); the user will see the friendly "Windows Server 2019" `title` which is tied to the `ws2019` `const` value. For now, I'll also set the `default` value of the field so I don't have to actually click the dropdown each time I test the deployment.
# Flavor Mapping
size:
title: Resource Size
type: string
oneOf:
- title: 'Micro [1vCPU|1GB]'
const: micro
- title: 'Tiny [1vCPU|2GB]'
const: tiny
- title: 'Small [2vCPU|2GB]'
const: small
default: small
Now I'm asking the user to pick the t-shirt size of the VM. These will correspond to the Flavor Mappings I defined earlier. I again chose to use a `oneOf` data type so that I can show the user more information for each option than is embedded in the name. And I'm setting a `default` value to avoid unnecessary clicking.
The `resources` section is where the data from the inputs gets applied to the deployment:
resources:
Cloud_vSphere_Machine_1:
type: Cloud.vSphere.Machine
properties:
image: '${input.image}'
flavor: '${input.size}'
networks:
- network: '${resource.Cloud_vSphere_Network_1.id}'
assignment: static
Cloud_vSphere_Network_1:
type: Cloud.vSphere.Network
properties:
networkType: existing
So I'm connecting the selected `input.image` to the Image Mapping configured in vRA, and the selected `input.size` goes back to the Flavor Mapping that will be used for the deployment. I also specify that `Cloud_vSphere_Machine_1` should be connected to `Cloud_vSphere_Network_1` and that it should use a `static` (as opposed to `dynamic`) IP address. Finally, vRA is told that the `Cloud_vSphere_Network_1` should be an existing vSphere network.
All together now:
formatVersion: 1
inputs:
# Image Mapping
image:
type: string
title: Operating System
oneOf:
- title: Windows Server 2019
const: ws2019
default: ws2019
# Flavor Mapping
size:
title: Resource Size
type: string
oneOf:
- title: 'Micro [1vCPU|1GB]'
const: micro
- title: 'Tiny [1vCPU|2GB]'
const: tiny
- title: 'Small [2vCPU|2GB]'
const: small
default: small
resources:
Cloud_vSphere_Machine_1:
type: Cloud.vSphere.Machine
properties:
image: '${input.image}'
flavor: '${input.size}'
networks:
- network: '${resource.Cloud_vSphere_Network_1.id}'
assignment: static
Cloud_vSphere_Network_1:
type: Cloud.vSphere.Network
properties:
networkType: existing
Cool! But does it work? Hitting the **Test** button at the bottom right is a great way to validate a template before actually running a deployment. That will confirm that the template syntax, infrastructure, and IPAM configuration is all set up correctly to support this particular deployment.
Looks good! I like to click on the **Provisioning Diagram** link to see a bit more detail about where components were placed and why. That's also an immensely helpful troubleshooting option if the test *isn't* successful.
And finally, I can hit that **Deploy** button to actually spin up this VM.
Each deployment has to have a *unique* deployment name. I got tired of trying to keep up with what names I had already used so kind of settled on a [DATE]_[TIME] format for my test deployments. I'll automatic this tedious step away in the future.
I then confirm that the (automatically-selected default) inputs are correct and kick it off.
The deployment will take a few minutes. I like to click over to the **History** tab to see a bit more detail as things progress.
It doesn't take too long for activity to show up on the vSphere side of things:
Image: vSphere is cloning the source template
And there's the completed VM - notice the statically-applied IP address courtesy of {php}IPAM!
And I can pop over to the IPAM interface to confirm that the IP has been marked as reserved as well:
Image: Newly-created IPAM reservation
Fantastic! But one of my objectives from earlier was to let the user control where a VM gets provisioned. Fortunately it's pretty easy to implement thanks to vRA 8's use of tags.
Just about every entity within vRA 8 can have tags applied to it, and you can leverage those tags in some pretty creative and useful ways. For now, I'll start by applying tags to my compute resources; I'll use `comp:bow` for the "BOW Cluster" and `comp:dre` for the "DRE Cluster".
I'll also use the `net:bow` and `net:dre` tags to logically divide up the networks between my sites:
I can now add an input to the Cloud Template so the user can pick which site they need to deploy to:
inputs:
# Datacenter location
site:
type: string
title: Site
enum:
- BOW
- DRE
# Image Mapping
I'm using the `enum` option now instead of `oneOf` since the site names shouldn't require further explanation.
And then I'll add some `constraints` to the `resources` section, making use of the `to_lower` function from the cloud template expression syntax [6] to automatically convert the selected site name from all-caps to lowercase so it matches the appropriate tag:
[6] cloud template expression syntax
resources:
Cloud_vSphere_Machine_1:
type: Cloud.vSphere.Machine
properties:
image: '${input.image}'
flavor: '${input.size}'
networks:
- network: '${resource.Cloud_vSphere_Network_1.id}'
assignment: static
constraints:
- tag: 'comp:${to_lower(input.site)}'
Cloud_vSphere_Network_1:
type: Cloud.vSphere.Network
properties:
networkType: existing
constraints:
- tag: 'net:${to_lower(input.site)}'
So the VM will now only be deployed to the compute resource and networks which are tagged to match the selected Site identifier. I ran another test to make sure I didn't break anything:
Image: Testing against the DRE site
It came back successful, so I clicked through to see the provisioning diagram. On the network tab, I see that only the last two networks (`d1650-Servers-4` and `d1660-Servers-5`) were considered since the first three didn't match the required `net:dre` tag:
Image: Network provisioning diagram
And it's a similar story on the compute tab:
Image: Compute provisioning diagram
As a final test for this change, I kicked off one deployment to each site to make sure things worked as expected.
Image: vSphere showing one VM at each site
Nice!
This was kind of an easy introduction into what I've been doing with vRA 8 these past several months. The basic infrastructure (both in vSphere and vRA) will support far more interesting and flexible deployments as I dig deeper. For now, being able to leverage vRA tags for placing workloads on specific compute resources is a great start.
Things will get *much* more interesting in the next post, where I'll dig into how I'm using vRealize Orchestrator to generate unique computer names which fit a defined naming standard.
---
Enabling FIPS Compliance Fixes Aria Lifecycle 8.14
I Ditched vSphere for Proxmox VE
PSA: Microsoft's KB5022842 breaks Windows Server 2022 VMs with Secure Boot
---
