๐พ Archived View for scholasticdiversity.us.to โบ scriptures โบ jewish โบ t โบ Rashi%20on%20Leviticus%201โฆ captured on 2024-05-10 at 12:08:42. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
10 โ[1] ืขืจืืช ืืช ืื ื THE NAKEDNESS OF THE DAUGHTER OF THY SON [OR THE DAUGHTER OF THY DAUGHTER THOU SHALT NOT UNCOVER] โ When it states "thy daughterืด Scripture is speaking of his daughter born of a woman whom he had outraged (similarly "the daughter of thy son" means, the son born of such a woman). This must be so, for that one is forbidden to marry one's daughter or the daughter of one's daughter who was born of one's wife we may learn from the prohibition (v. 17) in the verse beginning ืืฉื ืืืชื ืขืจืืช "the nakedness of a woman and her daughter" of whom it is stated "thou shalt not uncover" and which thus implies the prohibition to marry one's daughter (and forbids one's marriage with one's daughter's daughter; for Scripture continues there: โneither shalt thou take her son's daughter or her daughter's daughter) whether she be begotten by him or by another man (cf. Yevamot 22b and Rashi von v. 17).
โ[2] ืขืจืืช ืืช ืื ื THE NAKEDNESS OF THY SON'S DAUGHTER [โฆ THOU SHALT NOT UNCOVER] โ Since even thy son's daughter (the former being born from an ืื ืืกื) is forbidden, the prohibition concerning thy own daughter born of thy ืื ืืกื could be derived by a conclusion a minori ad majus (ืงืดื). But because there is a rule ืืื ืืืืืจืื ืื ืืืื โno prohibition can be derived by a logical conclusion" they (the Rabbis) derived it in Treatise Yevamot 3a by an analogy (ืืืืจื ืฉืื) based on the similar expression ืื ื โ ืื ื used here and in v. 17.
Version: Pentateuch with Rashi's commentary by M. Rosenbaum and A.M. Silbermann, 1929-1934
Source: https://www.nli.org.il/he/books/NNL_ALEPH001969084
License: Public Domain