šŸ’¾ Archived View for idiomdrottning.org ā€ŗ gibberish captured on 2024-05-10 at 11:22:01. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

ā¬…ļø Previous capture (2024-03-21)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Thinking about the Gibberish app

A while ago, I talked about the defunct mail app ā€œTempoā€ as an interesting app to look at. I like looking at apps even though theyā€™re proprietary and tied to a proprietary platform and Iā€™d never use them myself, just for inspiration or food for thought and discussion.

Tempo was nothing new in my mind, but very new in actual practice and implementation. It was GTD principles finally applied to a mail app design. Many of design decisions that were just right; batching some senders while giving you immediate access to an allowlist, having a todo list one of the main tabs, and so on.

Now here we have Gibberish, another interesting UI to study. Again, with all due respect to the implementer, itā€™s not a platform Iā€™d wanna be on and, like Tempo, it costs a pretty penny, but it brings some UI innovations: it looks like a cozy chat window with the now traditional colored bubbles.

Gibberish

You write thoughts in a chat window as if you were chatting to yourself, sending messages, but you can edit the messages, maybe reorder them (I donā€™t know whether you can do that or not), and combine them with each other.

For readers, they look just like normal blog posts, thereā€™s RSS and thereā€™s a normal web view. The weirdo chat bubble interface is only for the person writing them.

Itā€™s supposedly a way to overcome writerā€™s block. I havenā€™t tried the app (and not gonna), but I do believe that this does work.

It reminds me a little bit about the old ā€œDrivelā€ app for GNOME that I used briefly twenty years ago or so, although that one didnā€™t worke too well because you basically only had a tiny liā€™l window to write one message, it felt cramped; Gibberishā€™ idea to instead combine several messages into posts is awesome.

I think this is also why people are writing Twitter threads instead of more easily readable texts: because it does help writerā€™s block. The problem on Twitter is that itā€™s then not very comfy to read those posts, but Gibberish doesnā€™t have the same problem.

For a few years Iā€™ve had some scripts & macros that helps me clean my IRC rants up into blog posts. I donā€™t use that very often, but sometimes I do. Email to blog posts, now thatā€™s more common, or rants on Fedi or other forum sites. What also often happens is that I start writing something in a small window, like this post youā€™re reading now. I was bookmarking the Gibberish site and in the description field I started writing and writing because I had more thoughts that would fit so I switched it to an Emacs buffer. That's easier now when my bookmarking app also uses Emacsā€”I just need to rename the file and add a header and we're off to the races.

Iā€™ve been playing interactive fiction games since I was a kid but I really got into ā€˜em after Gargoyle was released, a super minimalist, book-like interactive fiction app that looks gorgeous. But another IF app thatā€™s just as inspiring and that Iā€™ve spent just as much time with is TextFiction, which, just like Gibberish, looks like an SMS app. Probably the killer app for Android, Iā€™d say. I havenā€™t used Android in many years but TextFiction is one of the gems of F-Droid.

The Gibberish introductory post makes good points about how UI chrome can be a good thing. Sparse, open, and cold isnā€™t necessarily better than cozy & visually interesting. I went through a period a while back when I wasnā€™t reading as many books as I used to because the text kept jumping around and every book felt just like a wall of text; this was when my astigmatism just started to get worse. As Iā€™ve talked about before, I got around this by moving a piece of paper, or my hand, or fingers over the page, or just holding my hand up next to the page. On my e-reader I put stickers on the border. Making the paragraph visually distinct from each other makes it easier to focus on them, which is the opposite of the super minimalist approach.

I never had any issues reading comics, or even some of those ā€œcutesyā€ textbooks like the Heads First series or the GURPS series, so those ā€œholding up my handā€ or ā€œdecorate with stickersā€ techniques started as an older idea that I still havenā€™t gotten around to: a script thatā€™ll take a text or an ebook or a Gemini page and make it look sligthly more like comics by having the paragraphs be different, having each paragraph be one of a number of random styles, colors, font styles etc. I might still do this one day, but my need for it has lessened as I got more used to reading texts again, occasionally doing the hand trick only when Iā€™m especially dizzy:

Re: I canā€™t read šŸ“š

Delta Chat has a similar appeal for me. Itā€™s weirdly both minimalistic and adding chrome at the same time. It strips away signatures and headers and the general ā€œoverheadā€ of each message, it inlines subjects (or hides the subject entirely if the message is just an image), while still keeping the messages distinct and easier to read since theyā€™re all different sizes and shapes. It does add the annoyance of making me have to click on every sender if I get a lot of messages; I wish allowlisting was way easier on Delta Chat so I could batch-read everything except for friends and fam. Iā€™m kind of getting sick of using it. I just need to fix the remaining bugs in Autocrypt.el's Notmuch implementation...

But thatā€™s on the visual psychology side of things. I donā€™t wanna underestimate the piecemeal aspect. Writing a big paper or novel can be super daunting, and so can even a blog post sometimes. Thereā€™s the popular advice that writing your paper one sentence a day is better than never writing it. When I was in school, what I did was use an outliner (org-mode, at the time) and Iā€™d have two files. One for all my ideas, putting them in a tree structure that made sense to me, one thought at a time. And the other was a skeleton made from the template that the school wanted, like ā€œAbstract, Conclusionsā€ etc etc, I could copy that same template between all the papers but then I filled that template out from the outline I had made, moving the bullets from one outline to the other until I had moved (or discarded) all of those thoughts.

I should take some of my own advice, or make up some new advice, because I had an idea for a writing project (an RPG mystery game) last December and had planned to start on it this quarter but Iā€™ve just not been doing it, I started writing the first case but it got so boring and so ā€œboxfillingā€.

Now, for my fellow Geminauts out there, it might seem completly backwards that Iā€™m here praising weirdo colors & fonts on a super austere and minimalist platform like Gemini. But hold on a liā€™l bit there! Gemini is awesome not beacuse it doesnā€™t have styling. Itā€™s awesome because *, like God intended! Iā€™m reading a lot of Gemini capsules but Iā€™m piping the gemtext through an RSS filter so I can read them in this poppy and colorful RSS reader that my friend made. (I'm bugging him every now and then to make it open source, to just put up a repo, it's gratis already.)

So I donā€™t read Gemini through a monospaced black screen with green text. Iā€™m reading it with style and ease.ā™„ļøŽ

And this frog fable by the Gibberish guy is spot on for how the drive for wanting to take credit often leads into trouble:

The Story of the Frog - Gibberish and Stuff

I feel it since one of my reactions (that certainly shine through in this post) was that ā€œhey Iā€™ve had similar ideas!ā€; so dumb. But thatā€™s OK. Itā€™s OK to think about ideas and think about how we can make interfaces differently and what works and what doesnā€™t work.