š¾ Archived View for idiomdrottning.org āŗ dogpile captured on 2024-05-10 at 10:59:42. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
ā”ļø Next capture (2024-08-18)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Being critical of someone in person or in a small group is a difficult time for everyone involved but itās part of normal life.
But when Iām being critical of someone publically, especially in a many-to-many medium like online, what happens is that I get a figurative āmegaphoneā probably better known as āten thousand faceless clowns who claim to be on my āsideā but who are much meaner and harrassier and have way worse arguments will ājoin inā or will have already joined in even before I say anythingā. A tidal wave of hot takes drowning out attempts at nuanced criticisms and small course-corrections.
Itās easy to get fooled into thinking that āmy particular personal take is reasonable, nuanced, restrained, logical, correct, emotional, insightful, informative, personalā, and all of that might be true. I know and I can honestly tell myself that I donāt want an avalanche of stones to be thrown, just one liāl reasonable and commensurate pebble. But thatās what everyone else in the stone-throwing mob is also kidding themselves. Each of their own liāl rocks on their own is āwell, weāve got to be able to criticize wrong things and stand up for whatās good and rightā but the internet has made that not possible anymore. Weāre not raindrops anymore, weāre a tsunami. Weāre not snowflakes, weāre an avalanche.
Iām not saying criticism isnāt a necessary and a good thing. It is. Normally. But the way the global convo is set up makes it impossible. Weāve taken something thatās normally necessary and vital and important, and made it impossible. Thatās a problem.
Humanity needs to figure out a new way to deal with this, with each other. The global village is getting to feel both cramped and lonely at the same time.
Yeah, yeah, I know. Weāre gonna be the most socially and psychologically well-adjusted species on the cinder. But mass media dehumanization is part of that problem, too. The world has a problem it has to solve together.
Iām just naturally such a negative person but I need to learn to really hold back online instead of dishing out the well-deserved spoonfuls Iāve got so plenty of in my bitter liāl heart.
Nat seems to agree with me that criticism is dangerous in our modern world.
But criticism is also important. The fact that itās no longer possible is a huge problem. Sometimes people do need to come correct. So this is a tricky conundrum that people need to solve together. Me and my own personal liāl policy wonāt change things.
Going too far in favor of callouts we get angry, life-wrecking mobs, but I donāt wanna silence victims either. Are there other ways we can organize how our entire conversation is set up? This is also why Iām not into Twitter, or into how Reddit was set up before they invented separate subreddits: āone chatroom per planetā is a model that wrecks humanityās brains a liāl bit.