💾 Archived View for gemini.bortzmeyer.org › rfc-mirror › rfc7134.txt captured on 2024-05-10 at 14:09:37.
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) B. Rosen
Request for Comments: 7134 NeuStar
Updates: 4412 March 2014
Category: Standards Track
ISSN: 2070-1721
The Management Policy of the Resource Priority Header (RPH) Registry
Changed to "IETF Review"
Abstract
RFC 4412 defines the "Resource-Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-
Priority Priority-values" registries. The management policy of these
registries is "Standards Action". This document normatively updates
RFC 4412 to change the management policy of these registries to "IETF
Review".
Status of This Memo
This is an Internet Standards Track document.
This document is a product of the Internet Engineering Task Force
(IETF). It represents the consensus of the IETF community. It has
received public review and has been approved for publication by the
Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG). Further information on
Internet Standards is available in Section 2 of RFC 5741.
Information about the current status of this document, any errata,
and how to provide feedback on it may be obtained at
http://www.rfc-editor.org/info/rfc7134.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2014 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Rosen Standards Track [Page 1]
RFC 7134 RPH Registry Management March 2014
1. Introduction
[RFC4412] defines the "Resource-Priority Namespaces" and "Resource-
Priority Priority-values" registries. The management policy of these
registries is "Standards Action" [RFC5226]. Experience suggests that
a document that only defines a new namespace with its priorities, and
does not create new protocol semantics, should not be a Standards-
Track document. Therefore, this document updates [RFC4412] to change
the management policy of the registries to "IETF Review".
2. Security Considerations
This document does not introduce any security considerations beyond
those discussed in [RFC4412].
3. IANA Considerations
IANA has changed the management policy of the "Resource-Priority
Namespaces" and "Resource-Priority Priority-values" registries to
"IETF Review" [RFC5226].
4. Normative References
[RFC4412] Schulzrinne, H. and J. Polk, "Communications Resource
Priority for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP)", RFC
4412, February 2006.
[RFC5226] Narten, T. and H. Alvestrand, "Guidelines for Writing an
IANA Considerations Section in RFCs", BCP 26, RFC 5226,
May 2008.
Author's Address
Brian Rosen
NeuStar
470 Conrad Dr.
Mars, PA 16046
US
Phone: +1 724 382 1051
EMail: br@brianrosen.net
Rosen Standards Track [Page 2]