💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › flipperzero › 14988 captured on 2024-03-21 at 19:18:55. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Comment by 😎 flipperzero

Re: "Red state vs. Blue state?"

In: s/US-politics

They're both edges of the same sword: out for your life and your coins.

😎 flipperzero

Feb 13 · 5 weeks ago

8 Later Comments ↓

😎 flipperzero · Feb 13 at 20:21:

@SamuraiCrow do you got that money for those "urban area" people to move ANYWHERE that's supposedly "like-minded"? Where does that exist if media and PEOPLE AROUND seem to only broadcast "mrreeeh they want me dead, Ill kill them myself, mreeeh!" What of that?

🚀 SamuraiCrow [OP] · Feb 13 at 20:24:

The gunslingers are within the constraints of the second amendment as long as they don't go on the offensive. Defending life and property are the purposes of the U.S. Constitution and any politician that disagrees is direlect.

🚀 stack · Feb 14 at 00:19:

I've lived in small places and biggest cities... Self-reliance is nice, but it sure is great to wake up, go downstairs and get a really good latte! And have a conversation with someone you don't know, who is not a total idiot.

🐧 istvan · Feb 14 at 10:01:

Different mindset I guess. No interest in lattes or coffee shops or trying to find someone to talk to. I’d rather just put the steel percolator on the flame and cook breakfast while I wait. Two weeks of coffee for $5 vs $5 a day.

🌲 Half_Elf_Monk · Mar 20 at 02:55:

Breakdowns like that make me wonder... to what extent do certain problems need to be solved by federal policies? Couldn't a county-level set of solutions be more acceptible for everyone? Let 'blue' areas enact blue laws, and 'red' areas enact 'red' laws. Yeah, some things need a larger set of buy-in (like, say, national defense). But others could be handed a LOT more locally. What prevents us from doing it this way?

🚀 stack · Mar 20 at 06:38:

Fuck national defense. That same money could be used to eliminate world hunger, and provide free education and housing. instead it is lining the pockets of corrupt fucks who spend their days pretending to be important people.

these assholes will not solve any problems, ever. never had and never will.

🐧 istvan · Mar 20 at 12:06:

Honestly? The petty tyrant in everyone’s head who desires power to compel other people to follow HIS laws and a pathological obsession with THEIR business.

It’s obvious on both sides, and no one wants to own it because everyone believes he is right.

It’s the same thing that makes people think, “You think differently than I do, and I’m morally justified to try and destroy your life for it.”

🌲 Half_Elf_Monk · Mar 20 at 15:47:

Education and Housing are corruptible too... There's just less money to be made there right now. We could discuss where "defending people from tyrants" goes in the scale of 'local or federal'. But why not let local communities determine their own way? Rural vs. Urban environments might have totally different approaches to, say, healthcare or public transportation. Who benefits when this just HAS to be solved with a federal mandate?

Original Post

🌒 s/US-politics

Red state vs. Blue state? — Have you ever noticed how the media refers to Democrat-dominated states as Blue and Republican-dominated ones as Red? My observation is that if you see a county-by-county breakdown of the country, only the major metropolitan areas are really all that blue in the first place. Rural areas in so-called Blue states are actually just as Red as any other state!

💬 SamuraiCrow · 14 comments · Feb 13 · 5 weeks ago