💾 Archived View for gem.acdw.net › html › RE%3A%20ddevault%2C%20Is%20this%20a%20good%20idea%3F › 1 captured on 2024-03-21 at 15:57:50.
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-12-17)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
<!DOCTYPE html> <html> <head> <meta charset="utf-8"> <title>RE: ddevault, Is this a good idea?</title> <link type="text/css" rel="stylesheet" href="/default.css"/> <meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1"> </head> <body> <h1>RE: ddevault, Is this a good idea?</h1> <p>I want to reply, not to the aggregator idea (I do like it), but to the last paragraph here: <p> <ul> <li><a href="gemini://drewdevault.com/2020/11/15/RE-Is-this-aggregator-idea-good.gmi">RE: RE: RE: RE: ....</a> </ul> <p> <blockquote>And an aside: I generally dislike this approach of using our gemlogs to have discussions via "RE: post title" and such-with. Isn't this better suited to the mailing list?</blockquote> <p> <p>I don't think so -- there's a bunch of RE's that aren't about gemini the protocol at all (see: 5Qs, etc). You can always check backlinks to see a "thread" here: <p> <ul> <li><a href="gemini://gus.guru/backlinks?tilde.team/~ew0k/is-this-aggregator-idea-good.gmi">for Is This Aggregator Idea Good?</a> </ul> <p> <p>Now, that being said, I *do* think that Shannon is (a) a great name and (b) a pretty good idea -- tho we already have CAPCOM and Spacewalk. But . Why not a third?! <p> <p>Eventually I'm going to set up the first two on breadpunk.club (or here?) with GUS's known URLs and known feeds lists. Might as well try a Shannon too :) <p> <p>Stay tuned. </body> </html>