💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 007674.gmi captured on 2024-03-21 at 15:41:02. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-09-08)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Stephane Bortzmeyer stephane at sources.org
Sun Dec 12 10:44:20 GMT 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Sat, Dec 11, 2021 at 01:06:25PM -0500, Michael Lazar <lazar.michael22 at gmail.com> wrote a message of 75 lines which said:
Your best bet, if you're serious about this, is to go ahead and
implement your proposal in your client. If others find it useful
they will start using it too
I'm not sure it is something to recommend since it can leads to "defacto" standards and to "best viewed with client XYZ
7" which wereone of the reasons we ran away from the Web.
This doesn't allow for mixed languages inside of a single
line/paragraph though.
Unicode has a solution, but its use is discouraged<http://unicode.org/faq/languagetagging.html>. "Most other users whoneed to tag text with the language identity should be using standardmarkup mechanisms, such as those provided by HTML, XML, or other richtext mechanisms."
Gemtext cannot do everything (and I tend to regard this as a feature,not a bug).