💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 007508.gmi captured on 2024-03-21 at 15:47:41. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

A Gemini-style proposal

Devin Prater r.d.t.prater at gmail.com

Wed Nov 3 13:05:41 GMT 2021

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Do we have to go PDF? Oh dear God. Okay if they're textual in nature, sure.But you know someone is gonna start uploading scans. I mean people can dothat in HTML kinda, but thankfully it's harder to do.Devin Praterr.d.t.prater at gmail.com

On Mon, Nov 1, 2021 at 9:35 AM DJ Chase <u9000 at posteo.mx> wrote:

On Mon, 2021-11-01 at 12:41 +0100, Alex Schroeder wrote:
I’d say no. The functionality of Gemini is pretty much done.
Also, that's not line-oriented.
People are of course free to write their own clients that do their own
processing. But the standard is: if you need that, serve Markdown or
HTML documents instead of extending Gemtext.
Side note: I think it's best to serve PDFs instead of other markup
languages because everyone can view PDFs. Many people don't have a
markdown viewer/compiler installed, and serving HTML is, in my opinion,
overkill for Gemini.
--
DJ Chase
They, Them, Theirs
-------------- next part --------------An HTML attachment was scrubbed...URL: <https://lists.orbitalfox.eu/archives/gemini/attachments/20211103/fd34e401/attachment.htm>