💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 007419.gmi captured on 2024-03-21 at 15:51:00. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
mntn mntn at mntn.xyz
Tue Oct 26 00:56:01 BST 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
No, that was just to explain why what can be applied to other standards can't to Gemini. My
proposal is fairly simple if you remove all the language bloat:
1. Take the original spec
2. Slap a public domain or whatever on it
3. Done. Now don't do anything, forever.
He can correct me if I'm wrong, but I assume that the final spec will be released under somesort of public domain license. Per the FAQ the goal appears to be to submit it to IETF and/orIANA.
This will apply when we start holding elections for Gemini.
Perhaps controversial, but we should not do this. Elections in a small, niche online communityare a quick path to capture by groups who don't have the community's best interest in mind.I've seen this happen many times.