💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 006100.gmi captured on 2024-03-21 at 16:33:28. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
PJ vM pjvm742 at disroot.org
Sun Mar 14 17:29:57 GMT 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On 14/03/2021 17:27, text at sdfeu.org wrote:
Big fan of Wikis here, thus I think another alternative could be
Wikiversity (a project of the "not-for-profit corporation"
Wikimedia):
[...]
The Gemini specification could be published and edited there as
well, with unwanted edits easily reverted, as these should be
concluded upon via discussions first, probably.
Discussions to specific topics, e. g. response codes, could be
sections in the Discuss tab to the Specification article or even own
discussion pages in case the topic is covered by its own
(sub-)article.
According to [1], Wikiversity is intended for *learning resources*,specifically learning resources different from what Wikipedia andWikibooks offer.
I fear that if we were to try to use it as a platform to develop theGemini specification, rather than just learning materials around Gemini,Wikiversity editors would not accept this. If one were to create suchpages on Wikiversity, they would probably be quickly removed usingWikiversity's speedy deletion guideline [2]; the very first criterionlisted for speedy deletion is "No educational objectives".
[1] https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Mission[2] https://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Wikiversity:Deletions
-- pjvm