💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 005534.gmi captured on 2024-03-21 at 16:40:27. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

[SPEC] Backwards-compatible metadata in Gemini

Sebastian Alejandro sebastian1231alejandro at gmail.com

Tue Feb 23 19:30:40 GMT 2021

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

On 2021-02-23 14:23, Julien Blanchard wrote:

I wholeheartedly agree, please stop proposing unnecessary complexity that benefits nobody (just for the sake of normalizing everything) or adds client display fancyness.
We should always consider underpowered devices, screen readers, people with a slow internet connection. I know TLS is already a burden for some of these cases so let’s not add more data to transfer.
julienxx

'Nuff said. We need to start focusing on the finer details rather than coming up with new ones. Sure, it might be a good idea in your head, but at one point or another the spec **will** be frozen.

Sebastian Alejandro | kayw