💾 Archived View for gemi.dev › gemini-mailing-list › 000390.gmi captured on 2024-03-21 at 17:30:49. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-12-28)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Hey all, I've made a HackerNews mirror for Gemini. You can access the mirror at gemini://dioskouroi.xyz. I have a post on my Gemlog going into some details at gemini://acidic.website/musings/gemgohane-release.gmi . Thanks, meff
> On 27 Sep 2020, at 01:58, Meff <meff at meff.me> wrote: > > > Hey all, > > I've made a HackerNews mirror for Gemini. You can access the mirror at > gemini://dioskouroi.xyz. I have a post on my Gemlog going into some > details at gemini://acidic.website/musings/gemgohane-release.gmi Thanks for creating that. A minor comment - it seems that some of the heading 3s in these comments section are missing a space. ###content Should be ### content Best wishes Luke
On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:18:01AM +0100, Luke Emmet wrote: > A minor comment - it seems that some of the heading 3s in these comments section are missing a space. > > ###content > > Should be > > ### content The whitespace is actually optional in the spec! This came about because solderpunk's goal was to create a spec for text/gemini where line type can be inferred from the first three characters of a line. ~lel
> On 27 Sep 2020, at 16:24, lel <lel at envs.net> wrote: > >> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:18:01AM +0100, Luke Emmet wrote: >> A minor comment - it seems that some of the heading 3s in these comments section are missing a space. >> >> ###content >> >> Should be >> >> ### content > > The whitespace is actually optional in the spec! This came about > because solderpunk's goal was to create a spec for text/gemini > where line type can be inferred from the first three > characters of a line. Well, if that's what the spec says.... But it is stylistically inconsistent given that all other headings and visible line types need a space. Luke
Luke Emmet <luke.emmet at gmail.com> writes: >> On 27 Sep 2020, at 16:24, lel <lel at envs.net> wrote: >> >>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2020 at 09:18:01AM +0100, Luke Emmet wrote: >>> A minor comment - it seems that some of the heading 3s in these comments section are missing a space. >>> >>> ###content >>> >>> Should be >>> >>> ### content >> >> The whitespace is actually optional in the spec! This came about >> because solderpunk's goal was to create a spec for text/gemini >> where line type can be inferred from the first three >> characters of a line. > > Well, if that's what the spec says.... > > But it is stylistically inconsistent given that all other headings and > visible line types need a space. For the most part, this is a bug on my part. I intended for there to be a space after the heading. Thanks for bringing this to my attention, I'll push a fix. - meff
---
Previous Thread: [ANN] gmnisrv: a Gemini server for POSIX systems