đŸ Archived View for welovedyou.xyz âș janwen âș notes âș pfl1.gmi captured on 2024-03-21 at 15:14:17. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
âŹ ïž Previous capture (2023-06-16)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
- Book is formatted as common questions teachers have about liberatory pedagogy
- Can third-world education be used in the first?
- The realities of education tend to focus us on practical strategies, but we shouldn't lose sight of theory
- *The challenge of "merging critical thought with daily* life", especially in teaching-- perhaps better accomplished through dialogue than solitary composition or meditation.
- F: "Rigor is not universal, what is universal is the need to be rigorous."
- I: Rigor is "communication which challenges the other to take part in the search". Students instead are given a "corpse of information" (punning on body of knowledge)
- "Hour after deadly hour and year after dull year, learning is just a chore imposed on students"
- PF: "I can't understand motivation as separate from action, as if I *get* motivated and *then* I can perform. This pov is anti-dialectical."
- "You become motivated to the extent that you are acting and not before acting".
- IS: The fact that teachers always lecture students about school's importance shows how the material and instruction fail to motivate in themselves
- Motivation "inside the action of study itself, inside the students' recognition of the importance of knowing to them"
- in current schools, "****The best thing is always the thing you are not doing*."Â ***; everything is in service of a distant goal
- Motivation crisis: curriculum refuses to change to be less alienating.
- "I call it a ***'performance strike'*** by students who refuse to study under current social conditions"
- "The job market has few rewards for high achievement"
- Students "move heaven and earth to get" what they truly want. Commercial culture "engages their shrewdness"
- Introducing tension between student-authored texts and "official" ones
- "By saying as little as necessary in the early going, I get some serious exercises and dialogue underway where the students are as active as I am."
- Beginning of class is beginning of my education about the students
- "Students are motivated out of the learning process when the course fully pre-exists in the mind of the teacher... do you see the corpse here? The learning already happened someplace else... The student is supposed to memorize the report."
- A course with more improvisation is exciting but also anxiety producing, but "this openness is required to overcome student alienation"
- Teachers usually only learn this kind of teaching by doing it
- PF: This is bound up in epistemology, the "gnosiological cycle"
- /// (pistis = belief, gnosis = knowledge)
- This cycle has two steps: producing knowledge and then knowing it.
- This is a collaborative cycle, but it's often severed: authorities produce knowledge, teachers transfer it to students to know it
- This cuts out the teacher's and students' capacities to create knowledge: "action, critical reflection, curiosity, demanding inquiry, uneasiness, uncertainty--all these virtues are indispensable to the cognitive subject"
- IS: "opening up new terrain" is motivating, skepticism brings in individual projects
- Without student participation in the creation of knowledge, ideology is reproduced unchallenged
- Knowledge should be "created and re-created" in the classroom
- ///what is re-creation? The rediscovery of facts? The enactment of scripted experiments in the lab? The independent arrival at conclusions many have reached before? moreso the latter i think
- PF: Teachers must also be researchers. Teaching itself is reknowing *what I thought I knew*.
- IS: Some knowledges are valued more than others. Tech for war and business, etc. University knowledge valued more than other scholars.
- Less valued also is "grounded research" directed at students as they really are and speak, and not in their phony academese.
- This kind of classroom can produce "unsupervised" or "unofficial knowledge."
- "The students do not believe the liberating teacher who does not shove information down their throats."
- Reading not as walking over or flying over the words, but instead as *re-writing them as they are read.*
- Reading as "fighting, even though loving" the text. A "very, very demanding operation"
- Students may not accept your invitation to adopt a critical posture, might think you're a wimpy professor for not having done all the knowing in advance
- IS: Students are good at rejecting authority, but they can reject liberation as well
- Listening to students to determine a "profile of resistances and openings"
- Making concessions to old habits to reduce anxiety: readings, papers, etc.
- It's difficult to get students to work critically with "disorienting" texts
PF: Teachers put away the "intimacy" of a book, its "soul", in order to privilege a predetermined scholarly point of view. The "scientific" task is to describe, not interpret, change, or know intimately.
IS: They emphasize "techniques", not "critical contact with reality"
PF: Not just techniques, not even just "critical thought", but drawing us into "the intimacy of society, the raison d'ĂȘtre of every object of study."
IS: All pedagogy "constructs one kind of society or another", they all relate to power, they all have social organization that confirms or challenges dominant arrangements.
PF: Transformation is possible because "consciousness is not a mirror of reality, but is *reflexive* and *reflective* *of *reality." We can gain distance, discover how we are conditioned, be metacognitive. We can know we are not free.
IS: "the irony of consciousness" -- studying our lack of freedom makes us free because we gain perspective on it