💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 6274.gmi captured on 2024-03-21 at 18:03:41. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)

➡️ Next capture (2024-05-10)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

What Donald Trump s election means for government-bond markets

2016-12-06 08:23:43

Recent falls in bond prices, and rises in yields, may not signal the end of low

interest rates

Dec 3rd 2016

THE death of the long bull market in bonds has been called many times in recent

years. Such a consummation is devoutly wished for by those who think the global

economy will never get back to health until short- and long-term interest rates

return to more normal levels.

Following the election of Donald Trump as American president, the funeral rites

are being read again. The yield on the ten-year Treasury bond jumped from 1.73%

(while the votes were being counted) to 2.36% at one stage; the yield on the

two-year bond rose from 0.78% to 1.12%. (Bond prices fall as yields rise.)

The rationale for the shift is the belief that Mr Trump will push through a

fiscal stimulus, in the form of tax cuts and infrastructure spending. Not only

will that boost the American economy but it will allow the Federal Reserve to

return monetary policy to more normal levels by pushing up rates from the

current 0.5%. It could also lead to higher inflation in the medium term.

Forecasts for American inflation in the early 2020s can be derived from the

bond market. In July, they pointed to 1.4%; now they imply 2.1%. All three

factors faster growth, rising short-term rates and higher inflation are usually

drivers of higher bond yields.

In the course of 2016, moreover, fears of deflation and a sharp slowdown in the

Chinese economy have steadily faded. As a result, it seems less and less likely

that investors would want to own government bonds, especially as trillions of

dollars-worth have been offering negative yields.

Nevertheless, this bond-market sell-off needs to be set in context. During the

taper tantrum of 2013, when the Fed signalled a slowing of its

quantitative-easing programme, the ten-year yield reached 3%. It was as high as

2.47% in June last year.

Moreover, other bond markets have not been as seriously affected by Mr Trump s

election (see chart). In Germany, ten-year yields may no longer be negative but

they are still just 0.2%. Indeed, the gap between German and American ten-year

yields is at its widest since the 1980s. British yields are around where they

were at the time of the Brexit vote but well below their level in January. In

Japan the yield on the ten-year bond is still close to the central bank s

target of zero.

Continued bond purchases by central banks are one reason why yields may not

rise that far in Europe and Japan. What is more, pension funds and insurance

companies will continue to be ready bond buyers at almost any yield level as

they seek to meet regulatory requirements or to match their long-term

liabilities.

Furthermore, it is not clear how much of Mr Trump s programme will be

implemented, nor indeed whether economic growth or inflation will actually

rebound. The factors affecting inflation are long-term: globalisation,

deregulation and automation, says David Lloyd of M&G, a fund-management group.

In addition, a rise in bond yields may play a part in choking off economic

growth. The ratio of total debt (governments and private sector combined) to

GDP has risen in both developed and developing economies since the 2008 crisis.

A large stock of debt needs a low interest rate to make it tolerable, says

Mike Amey of PIMCO, a fund-management group.

And if 2016 has taught investors anything, it is to take account of political

risk. In the past, this was a factor that bond investors in developed countries

rarely had to worry about. For a long time, politicians in the Western world

have been dancing round the same handbag, says Mr Lloyd. The policy

differences have been largely rhetorical.

The rise of extremist politicians brings with it the risk of extreme outcomes.

The problem for investors is that the implications of such shocks are not

uniform. The Brexit vote was followed by a fall in bond yields (as cautious

investors opted for the safety of bonds), but the election of Mr Trump caused

yields to rise. Had the president-elect made a swift promise to pursue his

protectionist agenda, however, bond yields might have fallen, since a tariff

war would hurt economic growth. The election of Marine Le Pen as French

president would probably cause European government bonds to sell off; yields in

America and Japan might fall.

The biggest problem for investors is that ultra-low yields leave so little

margin for error the likely annual return on most long-dated bonds can be wiped

out in an afternoon s trading. Government bonds may still find ready buyers,

but they won t sleep as soundly as they used to.