💾 Archived View for gmi.noulin.net › mobileNews › 4211.gmi captured on 2024-03-21 at 18:37:05. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-01-29)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
1970-01-01 02:00:00
rlp
Sep 29th 2012 | from the print edition
LATE last year this newspaper warned that Britain was entering another
recession, which could wipe 1% off output. We were more pessimistic than most
but not, it soon seemed, quite pessimistic enough. Official figures released in
July suggested the economy had shrunk for three successive quarters, resulting
in a cumulative loss of 1.3%. GDP is now scarcely higher than when the
coalition government took office in May 2010. Small wonder that George Osborne,
the chancellor of the exchequer, was booed by an otherwise ebullient crowd at
this summer s Paralympic Games.
This year has been widely written off. The IMF was due to revise down its
outlook soon after The Economist went to press. The Office for Budget
Responsibility, the fiscal watchdog, will probably follow in December, when Mr
Osborne gives his autumn statement on the economy and public finances. And
misery is giving way to despair about where growth will come from. Hopes that a
recovery would be driven by exports and investment have been dashed. Two-fifths
of British exports go to the euro zone, where recession is deepening. China and
India are cooling.
The only people cheerful about the state of Britain s economy these days are
those with a point to prove. For the opposition Labour Party, and for a host of
American pundits, Britain s travails perfectly illustrate the disastrous
consequences of government austerity. For right-wing Conservative MPs, on the
other hand, they demonstrate the insanity of rigid employment rules. Take a
scythe to labour-market regulations and taxes to get the country going again,
they insist.
Amid the gloom and point-scoring, though, something welcome is happening:
growth at last appears to be returning to Britain s economy (see article). The
squeeze on real take-home pay is easing as inflation falls and wages edge up.
Business surveys suggest activity is picking up. The fall in GDP in the second
quarter of this year now appears to have been the result of an extra bank
holiday; the effect will reverse as businesses return to normal, which suggests
the current quarter will see a positive figure for GDP growth. The country s
recovery is likely to be modest. But that is much better than nothing.
Consumers to the rescue
The strength of the jobs market is the main reason for optimism about Britain s
economy. Unemployment, at 8.1%, is above its level before the crisis but close
to the rich-country average. And that figure understates how much stronger the
jobs market is in Britain, where participation those in work or looking for it
is at a record high. Among the G7 countries only Canada, which was largely
untouched by the financial crisis, has a higher employment rate than Britain.
As a result, some of those helpful suggestions for boosting the economy can be
discarded. Those who claim that Britain s economy is being held back by
stringent employment rules cannot have checked the jobs figures. British labour
laws are, in any case, hardly onerous compared to continental ones. Nor does
the labour market support those who claim that public spending cuts have
condemned Britain to a permanent loss of capacity from a decaying skills base.
The swelling jobs count has lifted aggregate incomes, which augurs well for
consumer spending. The dismal trend of recent years means there is pent-up
demand. Spending by households slumped in the great recession of 2008-09, and
has barely improved since. Inflation stemming from a weaker pound and a surge
in oil prices crushed consumers purchasing power. Tax increases intensified
the squeeze. But inflation has now subsided and wages are creeping up. Real
incomes have started to rise as a result. Spending should follow.
Britain s economy has already had one false dawn, in 2009, and there are
countless threats to renewed recovery. If the euro-zone crisis, which is
flaring up again, leads to a break-up, the shock-waves will hit Britain.
America s squabbling politicians could send their economy over a fiscal cliff;
China s landing might be bumpier than hoped. At home, planned cuts in welfare
will take some of the puff from real incomes. Yet the tailwinds from falling
inflation, job creation and pay growth will probably prove stronger.
Householders know that the big tax rises in VAT and national insurance are
behind them. And there is potential for a stronger recovery if large firms
deploy their huge cash piles for capital spending.
Don t strangle it
This newspaper has, broadly, supported the coalition government s austerity
programme, and continues to do so. But the chancellor should resist the urge to
make up for lost time. This year s budget deficit is likely to be bigger than
was forecast in the spring, because revenues have been weaker than expected. As
a result, Mr Osborne will find it hard to hit one of the two targets he set
early in this parliament: that public debt should be falling by the fiscal year
2015-16. He should swallow his pride, and junk this target. Squeezing the
economy harder in order to hit it is barmy. The chancellor s other
deficit-reduction target, which takes account of the business cycle, is much
more sensible. He should also try to find room for more infrastructure
investment, which boosts economic growth more than other kinds of public
spending.
There are other ways of tipping the odds in favour of growth. Although the Bank
of England s quantitative easing programme is helpful, and should continue,
there are signs that returns are diminishing. QE has not eased the flow of
credit for businesses or consumers. But something else should. The funding for
lending scheme, launched by the Treasury and the Bank of England in July,
offers cheap funding for banks that sustain or increase lending. Its scale and
clever design mean it is far more likely to succeed than previous initiatives
to spur credit growth. If the recovery falters, a larger dose of this medicine
might be a better bet than more QE.
The economic storms that have deluged Britain since 2008 have not cleared
entirely. There is no reason for policymakers to relax, let alone celebrate.
But the weather at last appears to be improving somewhat.
from the print edition | Leaders