💾 Archived View for lofi.haiku-os.org › docs › develop › build › sourcecode.gmi captured on 2024-03-21 at 15:00:35. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2024-02-05)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Haiku uses Git for source control, combined with Gerrit for review of code changes.
Most of the operating system sources are stored in a single repository at
http://cgit.haiku-os.org/haiku
.
Another repository at
http://cgit.haiku-os.org/buildtools
contains the build tools, that is, gcc, binutils, and Jam, which are maintained by Haiku developers.
are hosed on GitHub.
Finally, some pre-compiled packages are downloaded during the build, these are built using Haikuporter from
.
https://www.haiku-os.org/guides/building/get-source-git
https://dev.haiku-os.org/wiki/CodingGuidelines/SubmittingPatches
https://review.haiku-os.org/Documentation/user-upload.html
The source tree is organized so you can easily find what you look for. If you’re already familiar with Haiku, you will notice that the source directory generally mirrors the way the filesystem in Haiku is organized.
At the top level, things that need to be “built” in some way are put in the "src" directory. For example, the “data” folder at the root contains files that are used as-is in the disk image, while “src/data” contain files that need to be compild or converted to different formats, such as the MIME database.
The buidtools repository uses vendor branches. This concept originates from
but applies just as well to Git. This organization allows to clearly separate the imported code from upstream, and the changes we have made to it.
The idea is to import all upstream changes in a dedicated branch (there are currently two, called vendor-gcc and vendor-binutils). These branches contains the sources of gcc and binutils as distributed by the GNU project, without any Haiku changes.
The master branch can then merge new versions from the vendor branches. This allows to use Git conflict resolution to make sure our patches are correctly ported from one version to the next.
It also makes it easy to compare the current state of our sourcecode with the upstream code, for example to extract patches that could be upstreamed.
Here is an example of the process used to update to a new version of binutils:
git checkout vendor-binutils # Move to the branch containing binutils git rm -rf binutils ; rm -rf binutils # Delete the existing version of binutils wget http://.../binutils-2.36.tar.xz # Download the latest version tar xf binutils-2.36.tar.xz # Extract the new binutils version mv binutils-2.36 binutils # Move the extracted files to the right place git add -f binutils # Add the new files to git git commit -m "import binutils 2.36" # Commit the files in the vendor branch git push origin vendor-binutils # You can push this directly to the branch
Now this can easily be merged into the master branch:
git checkout master git merge vendor-binutils
Review and fix the conflicts, if any, then push the changes for review on Gerrit.
Here is an example of the process used to update to a new version of binutils:
git checkout vendor-gcc # Move to the branch containing binutils git rm -rf gcc ; rm -rf gcc # Delete the existing version of binutils wget http://.../gcc-13.2.0.tar.xz # Download the latest version tar xf gcc-13.2.0.tar.xz # Extract the new binutils version mv gcc-13.2.0 gcc # Move the extracted files to the right place pushd gcc ./contrib/download_prerequisites # Download the required gmp, isl, mpfr and mpc dependencies rm gmp gmp-6.2.1.tar.bz2 # Remove gmp download and symbolic link mv gmp-6.2.1 gmp # Move the downloaded gmp dependency in place rm isl isl-0.24.tar.bz2 mv isl-0.24 isl rm mpc mpc-1.2.1.tar.gz mv mpc-1.2.1 mpc rm mpfr mpfr-4.1.0.tar.bz2 mv mpfr-4.1.0 mpfr popd git add -f gcc # Add the new files to git git commit -m "import gcc 13.2.0" # Commit the files in the vendor branch git push origin vendor-binutils # You can push this directly to the branch
Now this can easily be merged into the master branch:
git checkout master git merge vendor-binutils
Review and fix the conflicts, if any, then push the changes for review on Gerrit.
Comparing the two versions is easy because you can refer to them by branch names:
git diff vendor-binutils master -- binutils