💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › Ruby_Witch › 4806 captured on 2024-02-05 at 14:49:01. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2023-12-28)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Re: "Life in a Degrowthed Country"
Hi naf, I appreciate that you have a very different perspective on the idea of degrowth as you have seen the harms of uncontrolled devastation.
I do not believe there is any support for population control or depopulation anymore. This was attempted in China a while ago and was found not to work, as it is unenforceable even under a strict rule. Because of this, that Malthusian line of thinking has been severely out of fashion for over a decade.
What you are experiencing, sadly, is uncontrolled destruction, not degrowth. Degrowth must be a controlled process and focused only on those industries which do the most harm, while actually encouraging growth in things which are helpful for society, despite its name.
2023-08-27 · 5 months ago
@Ruby_Witch thanks for your comment, but I think that the club of Rome is very active in promoting their theory of limits to growth. I think they should call it the limits of petrol instead. Their Earth4All (oil for only developed nations initiative) was only launched in 2020.
The path that degrowth was achieved in Syria is not as important as the result, and from what I am seeing, a viable and healthy human population is not harmful, on the contrary, an under-populated community can cause more damage to the planet than what we might imagine.
🍄 Ruby_Witch · Aug 27 at 16:17:
@naf While I can definitely see how Syria's current situation can make the idea of anyone wanting to shrink some parts of any economy rather than grow them seem utterly ridiculous, I don't believe that what has happened there is the result of anyone's degrowth initiative.
There are quite a lot of tragic things which came together to cause the devastation of your beautiful country, but I don't think anyone ever sat down at a desk and said that this had to occur for the good of the environment. If anything, it was caused by a lot of greed and desire for growth in other places at the expense of your people.
But maybe I'm naive, I'm certain that you've seen a lot of things that I haven't.
I think it's more important to have a conscious population, then a growing one. If the population has a goal, a meaning to exist and the environment doesn't restrict it too much, it's going too grow. I am living in a town, which has been on a demographic decline for decades, it's not a city. Only 1 city in Lithuania is growing and it's mostly from immigration from other places. I may be wrong, I am not prolific in this topic.
@Ruby_Witch first of all I appreciate you taking my argumentum ad absurdum gently. I too am sure that what happened in Syria was not done by environmentalists! I just looked at the state of affairs here & tried to imagine how the world will look like if we curtailed its population to 4 billion people. How will the remaining people behave, what means will they use to fulfill their needs, how will they produce their food, the social & political structures they'll embrace & its effect on development; & it occured to me that: having less people might be harmful & damaging! If we want to be our planet's keepers we should have more people not less. Taking care of a planet is not a trivial mission
🐉 gyaradong · Aug 28 at 08:09:
Degrowth is not population control. It's about when your clothes get dirty, instead of throwing them out you just get a washing machine. Or when your plates get dirty, instead of throwing them out you just buy a dishwasher.
And if your dishwasher gets hungry, instead of leaving them to die and getting a new one you just feed them. Yes it harms the economy but overall its not that bad.
🐉 gyaradong · Aug 28 at 08:45:
More seriously, degrowth is about living equitably with the people around you. Capitalism makes it really easy to ignore the labor of others and dehumanize them. Then you get into the crazy rationalisation that everyone should have what you have. An order of magnitude the other way you'll be wishing everyone had a private yacht complete with staff... err... robot staff!
At some point you have to admit it's not just a fantasy which helps people rationalise their own existence, but it is actually a contemptible way to live. It is the fundamental cause of our ills. Leaving the big web for Gemini isn't just less resource intensive, for example, it is actually healing.
@gyaradong thanks for the informative description, but I think what you decribed is more related to sustainability, efficiency, common sense, etc..
As for degrowth, the term is the antonym of growth which webster defines as:
(1) To decrease in size by a natural and organic process; to decrease in bulk by the gradual loss of matter out of a living organism; -- said of animals and vegetables and their organs.
(2) To become smaller and weaker, to wane, to be diminished, to decline, to fail.
It is interesting that such a semantic was chosen for this term you described. Wonder if the plain meaning should be rejected in favour of description you kindly provided?
🐉 gyaradong · Aug 28 at 21:46:
the people who came up with the term chose a contentious name on purpose. Not everyone agrees with the choice, specifically because a lot of people equate it with decay.
— gemi.dev/cgi-bin/wp.cgi/view?Degrowth
Life in a Degrowthed Country — I am new to Gemini Space, in fact this is my first attempt at writing in this corner of the cyber world. In Gemini space I read many articles about degrowth, and being resident in a depopulated city, I thought I would give my two cents on the topic. The philosophy is not new. In the past they just used to call it Malthusianism, and in my opinion it is a harmful idea, a relic from the colonial past. I am writing now from Damascus, the capital city of Syria, a...