💾 Archived View for station.martinrue.com › maxheadroom › da41c777191841eb987fc3f4d150968b captured on 2024-02-05 at 11:23:33. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
:-) this is awesome guys, i hope i don't lose access to this 'account' as i don't know how access to it is stored. I wish there was a way to host my own capsule on a SBC or something without having my IP exposed, an .onionized capsule could that be done? but then with a sane url. So that people can actually remember where to find me. Yeah one day... just sharing my visions of the past.
3 weeks ago · 👍 userfxnet
@userfxnet i whis there was a gemini like alternative to IPFS that could be as lighweight as gemini. A GSFS? A Gem Space File System that allows us to host a gemspace on a local machine. A RPi , a smellphone, or a OpenWRT router, without exposing our IP, and WITH torrent like distribution. so that everyone who loads a capsule will share / distribute the capsule for a couple of days · 3 weeks ago
@gyaradong i had to think for 2 days, someone once told me that unstopabe domains is an option · 3 weeks ago
having a dns entry requires you, I believe, to share your physical address and real name. Sometimes publically. · 3 weeks ago
@userfxnet, @corscada so i would need a propper domain name and a decent DNS service. But how do i know how to pick one that would work? I kinda see the idea, but i don't have a domain name to play with just yet · 3 weeks ago
@corscada I need more insight in that IPFS stuff, If i can figure that one out then i would be ready to rock. gemini IPFS sounds very promising · 3 weeks ago
@maxheadroom if you keep the certificate you started the account with permanently saved and backed up, then you'll always have access to this account. the authorization to this account is held in that certificate as an encrypted key, much like how it works with connecting in to a pubnix with an ssh key. As long as you have the key, you have access to unlock the door. Dig? · 3 weeks ago
@corscada someone trying to visit the page would need to have Tor installed in order to be able to process the URL into the encrypted protocol seeking to be accessed. it would be active, but whether or not it'd work would depend on whoever is trying to visit depending whether or not they have Tor installed. Same as if I routed a sane URL to a IPFS URL. It's active, but relies on dependencies to properly work, if I'm understanding all this right. · 3 weeks ago
would there be any reason why in the DNS, pointing a sane URL at an onionised URL wouldn't work? · 3 weeks ago