💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 007359.gmi captured on 2024-02-05 at 10:44:48. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

Gemini on Sourcehut (was Re: News----good, bad, ugly? You decide (was Re: [spec] comments on the proposed gemini spec revisions))

Andrew Thorp andrew.thorp.dev at gmail.com

Fri Oct 22 20:53:26 BST 2021

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 
This can happen with a commercial hosting as well.

This is true. Commercial products like Sourcehut have SLAs they mustmeet however.

If we move to another source forge of any kind and stick with having a
single person owning the repos nothing is won compared the
situation we are facing currently.

I completely agree. One downside to Sourcehut is as of right now is thelack of an organizational construct. That's something that will belaunched when Sourcehut releases beta however. It won't be free, butit should allow the community to transfer ownership over to a group ofvolunteers.

Cheers,

Andrew