💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 007351.gmi captured on 2024-02-05 at 10:45:07. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

Gemini on Sourcehut (was Re: News----good, bad, ugly? You decide (was Re: [spec] comments on the proposed gemini spec revisions))

René Wagner rwagner at rw-net.de

Fri Oct 22 17:57:47 BST 2021

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

Hi,

i'm sad to see Sean go, but i'm also exicted that there are still people around who are interested in finalizing the spec.Maybe when things settled and a few people interested in further discussionhave come to consensus we should reach out to solderpunk with a proposal of how things could go on.

That being said, i'd like to throw another suggestion in for discussion:

Because of this, I have taken the liberty of creating a project and bug
trackers on Sourcehut. I will be coping the Gitlab issues and
repositories today.
=
https://sr.ht/~u9000/gemini-specification/ Sourcehut project

Instead of moving to yet another source forge that caused emotional reactionswithin the community for multiple times for different reasons, we should go for self-hosting.If there is any interest from the community i'd be happy to provide a giteainstance especially focused on projects for gemini (not limited to the spec). I've been running my own gitea instance for quite some time now [1] and i'mmaintaining geminispace.info, the widely used public search engine for gemini.

Comments highly appreciated. I'd flesh out some more details about my ideas if you are interested.

regardsRené

[1]: https://src.clttr.info