💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 007342.gmi captured on 2024-02-05 at 10:45:25. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Omar Polo op at omarpolo.com
Thu Oct 21 18:43:06 BST 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
just one thing: before copying the specification text etc I wouldprobably make sure what the license really is.
AFAICS there's no license, neither in the original text from solderpunknor in the rfc draft from Sean, which means that they hold all therights on those texts.
IANAL, so maybe what you're doing fells under the fair use, I don'tknow, my intention was just to make sure this point was taken intoconsideration.
good luck
u9000 <u9000 at posteo.mx> writes:
So far I have not seen anyone advocating for remaining on Gitlab, and I
have seen plenty of people advocating for Sourcehut or something
similarly simple. Additionally, the specification currently has no
maintainer.
Because of this, I have taken the liberty of creating a project and bug
trackers on Sourcehut. I will be coping the Gitlab issues and
repositories today.
=
https://sr.ht/~u9000/gemini-specification/ Sourcehut project
As I do not have an abundance of excess time, I would love for someone
to step-up to fill Sean's role. If needed, however, I can do so.
I hope this move will allow more people to contribute to the project---
even if they cannot create an account---and rejuvenate the specification
discussions.