💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 006979.gmi captured on 2024-02-05 at 10:53:55. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

<-- back to the mailing list

[Tech][Idea]Link syntax

Philip Linde linde.philip at gmail.com

Tue Aug 3 11:06:51 BST 2021

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - 

On 7/30/21, Anna “CyberTailor” <cyber at sysrq.in> wrote:

On 2021-07-30 01:48, Alan wrote:
What is the motivation here - is it to make gemtext a subset of markdown?
It already is.
Any sequence of characters is a valid CommonMark document.

The question is of course whether the markup of gemtext should be asubset of the markup of markdown. That is, whether sequences of textthat indicate a special meaning in CommonMark should also have thatsame meaning in gemtext. In that sense, it is not.

Best regards,Philip