💾 Archived View for rawtext.club › ~sloum › geminilist › 006411.gmi captured on 2024-02-05 at 11:00:08. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2021-11-30)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Matthew Ernisse matt at going-flying.com
Wed Apr 21 17:49:53 BST 2021
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 03:20:21PM +0000, Étienne Deparis said:
It’s more like their assumptions are ok. I mean I think we all agree on the
privacy need and take-back-the-web thing. But I don’t understand how they
switch so quickly from these assumption to
yet-another-static-website-generator. Ok it’s in js, maybe kind of new. But
woah, there is already a lot of static website generator and I’m not sure to
understand their point.
Agreed, and then they throw this out there.
"... we also need tools specifically optimised for building single-tenantweb applications ..."
I think part of the problem of the web these days is that everything seemsto want to be an application. The small web really can (should?) just be afolder with some files and a web server. It worked for the first 25 years.
--Matt
As a side question since I just noticed -- why does their smallweb staticsite generator feature a Twitch.tv replacement above the fold? Whois their audience?
-- Matthew Ernissematt at going-flying.comgemini://going-flying.com/