💾 Archived View for gemini.bunburya.eu › newsgroups › gemini › messages › t73id3$9pa$1@dont-email.me… captured on 2024-02-05 at 09:47:09. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content
⬅️ Previous capture (2022-07-16)
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
From: Sean Conner <spc@lucy.roswell.conman.org>
Subject: Re: Intend to standardize via RFC?
Date: Mon, 30 May 2022 23:01:56 -0000 (UTC)
Message-ID: <t73id3$9pa$1@dont-email.me>
Dan Luedtke <d@x.gl> wrote:
Are there efforts underway to standardize Gemini via IETF RFC?
If there is, it's flying way under the radar.
Gemini the protocol and gemtext the file format are currently in a single
specification. Furthermore, the specification is a bit blurry around the edges
as Stephane Bortzmeyer pointed out a while ago. I've read various opinions
regarding TOFU and certificate change/renewal.. Embarking on the route to RFC
could improve the specification without changing its simplicity.
What's the sentiment regarding a clearer specification?
If my experience in Gemini is anything to go by, it's not going to happen.
Solderpunk has basically disappeared, and his appointed assistant resigned
after a few months. I'm not saying the project is dead, but further
clarifications of the protocol and text format probably is.
-spc
Parent:
Intend to standardize via RFC? (by Dan Luedtke <d@x.gl> on Mon, 30 May 2022 02:49:03 -0000 (UTC))
Children: