💾 Archived View for gem.acdw.net › page › RE%3A%20ddevault%2C%20Is%20this%20a%20good%20idea%3F captured on 2024-02-05 at 10:05:28. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

RE: ddevault, Is this a good idea?

I want to reply, not to the aggregator idea (I do like it), but to the last paragraph here:

RE: RE: RE: RE: ....

And an aside: I generally dislike this approach of using our gemlogs to have discussions via "RE: post title" and such-with. Isn't this better suited to the mailing list?

I don't think so -- there's a bunch of RE's that aren't about gemini the protocol at all (see: 5Qs, etc). You can always check backlinks to see a "thread" here:

for Is This Aggregator Idea Good?

Now, that being said, I *do* think that Shannon is (a) a great name and (b) a pretty good idea -- tho we already have CAPCOM and Spacewalk. But . Why not a third?!

Eventually I'm going to set up the first two on breadpunk.club (or here?) with GUS's known URLs and known feeds lists. Might as well try a Shannon too :)

Stay tuned.

PS

:^) Of course, we could reimplement webmentions in gemini ... maybe call them RadioBursts, or why not EMPs?

~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~

History

Raw

HTML