gemini - kennedy.gemi.dev

💾 Archived View for dsfadsfgafgf.flounder.online › txt › john.txt captured on 2024-02-05 at 09:33:53.
-=-=-=-=-=-=-
A TOTALITARIAN SOCIETY HAS TOTALITARIAN SCIENCE – AUGUST 23, 2017

A totalitarian society has totalitarian science

by Jon Rappoport

August 23, 2017

Over the past 35 years, I’ve exposed as least as much fraudulent science as any
reporter around. That’s just a fact.

I mention it, because one would expect I’ve learned a few lessons in the
process.

And I have.

Government-backed science exists because it is a fine weapon to use, in order to
force an agenda of control over the population.

We aren’t talking about knowledge here. Knowledge is irrelevant. What counts is:
‘How can we fabricate something that looks like the truth?’

I keep pointing this out: we’re dealing with reality builders. In this case,
they make their roads and fences and buildings out of data, and they massage and
invent the data out of thin air to suit their purposes. After all, they also
invent money out of thin air.

Since 1987, one of my goals as a reporter has been to educate the public about
false science.

Between then and now, I have found that, with remarkably few exceptions,
mainstream reporters are studiously indifferent to false science.

They shy away from it. They pretend “it couldn’t be.” They refuse to consider
facts. They and their editors parrot “the experts.”

Official science has a stranglehold on major media. It has the force of a State
religion. When you stop and think about it, official science is, in a
significant sense, a holy church. Therefore, it is no surprise that the church’s
spokespeople would wield power over major information outlets.

These prelates invent, guard, and dispense “what is known.” That was precisely
the role of the Roman Church in times past. And those professionals within the
modern Church of Science are severely punished when they leave the fold and
accuse their former masters of lies and crimes. They are blackballed,
discredited, and stripped of their licenses. At the very least.

Totalitarian science lets you know you’re living in a totalitarian society.

The government, the press, the mega-corporations, the prestigious foundations,
the academic institutions, the “humanitarian” organizations say:

“This is the disease. This is its name. This is what causes it. This is the drug
that treats it. This is the vaccine that prevents it.”

“This is how accurate diagnosis is done. These are the tests. These are the
possible results and what they mean.”

“Here are the genes. This is what they do. This is how they can be changed and
substituted and manipulated. These are the outcomes.”

“These are the data and the statistics. They are correct. There can be no
argument about them.”

“This is life. These are the components of life. All change and improvement
result from our management of the components.”

“This is the path. It is governed by truth which our science reveals. Walk the
path. We will inform you when you stray. We will report new improvements.”

“This is the end. You can go no farther. You must give up the ghost. We will
remember you.”

We are now witnessing the acceleration of Official Science. Of course, that term
is an internal contradiction. But the State shrugs and moves forward.

The notion that the State can put its seal on favored science, enforce it, and
punish its competitors, is anathema to a free society.

For example: declaring that psychiatrists can appear in court as expert
witnesses, when none of the 300 so-called mental disorders listed in the
psychiatric literature are diagnosed by laboratory tests.

For example: stating that vaccination is mandatory, in order to protect the
vaccinated (who are supposed to be immune) from the unvaccinated. An absurdity
on its face.

For example: announcing that the science of climate change is “settled,” when
there are, in fact, huge numbers of researchers who disagree. —And then,
drafting legislation and issuing executive orders based on the decidedly
unsettled science.

For example: officially approving the release and sale of medical drugs (“safe
and effective”) which go on to kill, at a conservative estimate, 100,000
Americans every year. And then refusing to investigate or punish the agents of
these drug approvals (the FDA).

For example: permitting the widespread use of genetically modified food crops,
based on no studies of their impact on human health. And then, arbitrarily
announcing that the herbicide, Roundup, for which many of these crops are
specifically designed, is non-toxic.

For example: declaring and promoting the existence of various epidemics, when
the viruses purportedly causing them are not proven to exist or not proven to
cause human illness (SARS, West Nile, Swine Flu, etc.)

A few of you reading this have been with me since 1988, when I published my
first book, AIDS INC., Scandal of the Century. Among other conclusions, I
pointed out that HIV had never been shown to cause human illness; the front-line
drug given to AIDS patients, AZT, was overwhelmingly toxic; and what was being
called AIDS was actually a diverse number immune-suppressing conditions.

Others of you have found my work more recently. I always return to the subject
of false science, because it is the most powerful long-term instrument for
repression, political control, and destruction of human life.

As I’ve stated on many occasions, medical science is ideal for mounting and
launching covert ops aimed at populations—because it appears to be politically
neutral, without any allegiance to State interests.

Unfortunately, medical science, on many fronts, has been hijacked and taken
over. The profit motive is one objective, but beyond that, there is a more
embracing goal:

Totalitarian control.

On the issue of vaccines, I’ve written much about their dangers and
ineffectiveness. But also consider this: the push for mandatory vaccination goes
a long way toward creating a herd effect—which is really a social construction.

In other words, parents are propagandized to think of themselves as a kind of
synthetic artificial “community.”

“Here we are. We are the fathers and mothers. We must all protect our children
against the outliers, the rebels, the defectors, the crazy ones who refuse to
vaccinate their own children. We are all in this together. They are the threat.
The enemy. We are good. We know the truth. They are evil.”

This “community of the willing” are dedicated to what the government tells them.
They are crusaders imbued with group-think. They run around promoting “safety
and protection.” This group consciousness is entirely an artifact, propelled by
official science.

The crusaders are, in effect, agents of the State.

They are created by the State.

Androids.

They live in an absurd Twilight Zone where fear of germs (the tiny invisible
terrorists) demands coercive action against the individuals who see through the
whole illusion.

This is what official science can achieve. This is how it can enlist obedient
foot soldiers and spies who don’t have the faintest idea about how they’re being
used.

This is a variant on Orwell’s 1984. The citizens are owned by the all-embracing
State, but they aren’t even aware of it.

That’s quite a trick.

One of my favorite examples of double-think or reverse-think is the antibody
test. It is given to diagnosis diseases. Antibodies are immune-system scouts
sent out to identify germ-intruders, which can then be wiped out by other
immune-system troops.

Prior to 1985, the prevailing view of a positive antibody test was: the patient
is doing well; his body detected the germ and dispensed with it. After 1985, the
view was suddenly: this is bad news; the patient is sick or he is on the verge
of getting sick; he has the germ in his body; it does harm.

Within the medical community, no one (with very few exceptions) raised hell over
this massive switch. It was accepted. It was actually good for business. Now,
many more people could be labeled “needs treatment,” whereas before, they would
have been labeled “healthy.”

While I was writing my first book, AIDS INC., in 1987-8, I wrote the FDA asking
about a possible AIDS vaccine. I was told the following: every person given such
a vaccine would, of course, produce antibodies against HIV. That is the whole
purpose of a vaccine: to produce antibodies.

However, I was informed, patients receiving this vaccine would be given a letter
to carry with them, in case they were ever tested for HIV and came up positive.
The letter would explain that the antibodies causing the positive test were the
result of the vaccine, not the result of “natural” action inside the patient’s
body.

In other words, the very same antibodies were either protective against AIDS
(good) or indicative of deadly disease (bad).

This was the contradictory and ridiculous and extraordinary pronouncement of
official science.

It carries over into every disease for which an antibody test is administered.
If a vaccine against disease X is given, it delivers immunity, because it
produces antibodies. But if a diagnostic test for disease X reveals the presence
of the same antibodies, naturally produced in the body, this is taken as a sign
of illness.

Extrapolated to a more general level, the Word is: synthetic medical treatment
is good; the action of the body to heal itself is incompetent.

This is a type of superstition that would astonish even the most “primitive”
societies.

It no longer astonishes me. I see it everywhere in official science.

From the medical establishment’s point of view, being alive is a medical
condition.

The most useful politicians—as far as official science is concerned—are those
who automatically promote its findings. Such politicians are lifted into
prominence. They are champions of the Science Matrix. They never ask questions.
They never doubt. They never make waves. They blithely travel their merry way
into new positions of power, knowing they have enormous elite support behind
them. When they need to lie, they lie. They are taught that those who question
or reject official science are a tiny ‘demographic’ who can be ignored during
election campaigns. ‘Don’t worry about them. They don’t count.’ These
politicians are never in the trenches with the people on issues of health.

The elite Plan is universal collectivism, in which all citizens are atoms of a
giant molecule. Many lies need to be told in order to make that dream/nightmare
come true. If some of those lies are about science, so much the better. People
believe in science.

Think about the agendas behind universal vaccination, climate change, universal
psychiatric treatment, GMO food, and other ‘science-based’ frauds. They all
imply a model, in which individuals give up their power in exchange for ‘doing
good’ and becoming members of the largest group in the world: ‘disabled’ people
with needs that must be addressed and satisfied.

Instead of supporting the liberation of the individual, the controllers want to
squash it. Why? Because they fear individual power. It is forever the
unpredictable wild card. They want a society in which every thought an
individual thinks connects him to a greater whole—and if that sounds attractive,
understand that this Whole is a fiction, intentionally faked to resemble a
genuine oceanic feeling. The elite Whole is ultimately a trance-like fiction
that will slow down time to a crawl, and shrink space to a sliver, and focus
attention on a single mandate: wait for the next instruction from above, content
in the knowledge that it will benefit all of humanity.”

This program has many agents.

Some of them are agents of official science.


http://whale.to/c/a_totalitarian_society_has_total.html original at Whale.to