💾 Archived View for bbs.geminispace.org › u › dimkr › 3836 captured on 2023-12-28 at 18:00:46. Gemini links have been rewritten to link to archived content

View Raw

More Information

⬅️ Previous capture (2023-11-14)

➡️ Next capture (2024-02-05)

🚧 View Differences

-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Comment by 😈 dimkr

Re: "is there some tls implementation for small devicdes? there..."

In: s/Gemini

@Smokey In some ways, Spartan is a good alternative for small devices with static content (so no need for "authenticated users"), as long as the users use a client that supports Spartan and not just Gemini

😈 dimkr

Aug 05 · 5 months ago

2 Later Comments ↓

📻 solderpunk · Aug 05 at 09:30:

@smokey @dimkr For devices where TLS is really not possible, there's also the option of running something like Cosmarmot on a Pi on the same network, it translates Gemini stuff to Gopher. See https://git.carcosa.net/jmcbray/cosmarmot/

😈 dimkr · Aug 05 at 13:20:

@solderpunk (Seeing myself mentioned in your reply made me blush) Proxying is definitely an option, but I prefer not to add a "computer" that acts as a "TLS accelerator" for the Pico W running my Gemini capsule, and Gopher is not really an alternative (because of the fixed width and other limitations). I want to like Spartan but I'd prefer an "exactly Gemini minus the TLS" protocol supported by all conformant Gemini clients, for the sake of code reuse.

Original Post

🌒 s/Gemini

is there some tls implementation for small devicdes? there is a tcp stack in kon-tiki, and maybe other implementations. is it possible to use tls on some 8bit device with 64kb of memory? i am thinking of potential implementations on avr, 6502. i guess m68k may even run real openssl library?

💬 norayr · 11 comments · Aug 01 · 5 months ago · #programming